Corruption In The Iowa Legislature?

ALECorIOWAIn honor of the opening day of the 2016 Iowa legislative session, we invite you to partake of some background information that will help make sense of those seemingly crazy ideas of Governor Branstad and the Iowa GOP legislators, like dismantling public education.  If you’ve ever made a perplexed comment on social media, or just asked yourself, why?, read this.

Earlier this spring, Republicans in the Iowa House passed two ALEC model bills. One would strip away consumer protections by lowering the statute of repose for construction defects and another unworkable idea deals with state budgeting. They are both bad ideas and I voted against them.

Following the ALEC playbook, House Republicans have even refused to bring up a bipartisan minimum wage bill that has already passed the Iowa Senate. Since the last time a minimum-wage increase was approved in 2007 with 79 votes, there’s no question it would pass the House with bipartisan support again this year if Republicans would bring it up. –  Mark Smith is a State Representative and Democratic Leader in the Iowa House of Representatives. mark.smith@legis.iowa.gov

thegazette.com/subject/opinion/guest-columnists/stop-alecs-influence-in-iowa

THE STATE POLICY NETWORK

http://stinktanks.org/what-stinks/

What Is The State Policy Network?

The State Policy Network (SPN) is a web of so-called “think tanks” that push a right-wing agenda in every state across the country. Although many of SPN’s member organizations claim to be nonpartisan and independent, an in-depth investigation by non-profit, non-partisan investigative reporting groups the Center for Media and Democracy and Progress Now reveals that the State Policy Network and its affiliates are major drivers of the right-wing, ALEC-backed agenda in state houses nationwide, with deep ties to the Koch brothers and the national right-wing network of funders, all while reporting little or no lobbying activities.

What Is The State Policy Network’s Agenda?

The State Policy Network largely pushes a right-wing, corporate-backed agenda aimed at attacking the middle class. The State Policy Network and its affiliates push for privatizing public schools [italics BFIA’s], blocking expanded access to health care, lowering taxes for corporations and the very wealthy, undermining workers’ rights and unions, and a polluter’s agenda that attacks environmental protections. Some State Policy Network “think tanks” have even advocated for voter suppression laws that make it harder for Americans to vote and opposed common-sense gun safety bills.

How Is the State Policy Network Related to ALEC?

The State policy Network and many of its affiliates are members of the controversial American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), where corporate lobbyists and special interest group representatives vote as equals with state lawmakers behind closed doors on “model” legislation that in many cases ends up benefiting the corporations’ bottom line. The State Policy Network has played a major role in supporting ALEC, serving as a “chairman” level sponsor of the 2013 and 2011 ALEC Annual Conferences and acting as a voting member of several task forces. State Policy Network affiliates push parts of ALEC’s agenda in their respective states, and ALEC is also an associate member of the State Policy Network.  State Policy Network and its affiliates have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to ALEC.

How Does the State Policy Network Push Its Agenda?

While State Policy Network members call themselves “think tanks,” they rarely act as such. State Policy Network groups often engage in extensive lobbying activities, even though nonprofits are limited in the amount of lobbying activity they may participate in by the IRS. State Policy Network “think tanks” release “research” and policy reports, and there are numerous instances of State Policy Network think tanks being accused of skewing facts and using faulty research to reach their policy goals. Many State Policy Network think tanks also collaborate with the right-wing Franklin Center to launch agenda-driven “news” outlets, hawking right-wing talking points from behind a mask of journalism.

SOURCE: SourceWatch.org, “State Policy Network”

(click here to read more)

AlecTerry Branstad is a founding member of ALEC. Blog for Iowa has mentioned this dozens of times.  Curiously, the page where you used to be able to find the original members of ALEC on alec.org has been taken down.  

Find out more about ALEC’s influence in Iowa here in a guest opinion by Mark Smith in the Cedar Rapids Gazette.

Reports connecting state legislastion to ALEC model bills

Click here to take action

 

Posted in ALEC, Branstad, Iowa legislature 2016 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Steve King Tells Us What The Bottom Line Is

diverse group of  engineering students

diverse group of engineering students

From a dailykos.com story Thursday evening. Steve King lets the real driving force behind the Republican Party this year out of the bag in a way it is hard to misunderstand:

“This is perfect. Better than perfect. At a Ted Cruz campaign event in far-right Sioux County, Iowa, which helped hand Iowa caucus wins to Mike Huckabee in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012, anti-immigrant zealot Rep. Steve King had this to say:

“I want to build an America that looks like Sioux County looks,” said King. “Do what Sioux County does, and direct the destiny of the caucuses. You know you offset other parts of the state. Please, do that again.”

“An America that looks like Sioux County looks.”

Sioux County is 96.6 percent white, whiter than Iowa’s 92.1 percent white and a helluva lot whiter than America’s 77.4 percent. Of course that’s the place Steve King would want to model all of America after. And that’s the kind of stuff being said at events for Ted Cruz as he tries to become the leader of this entire nation.

Comment:

Looks like Trump isn’t the only candidate that wants to load up the trains and buses and point them to some border. I have forgotten too much algebra to calculate what the number is that has to go, but it is enormous.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Steve King | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Steve King Tells Us What The Bottom Line Is

Sunday Funday: Damn Gummint Edition

new face of protest in America

new face of protest in America

We are three weeks from the caucuses and my TV is crawling with these strange people calling each other names and making fun of each other. My wife informs those are Republicans and that is who they run for public office: by acting like 6th grade boys. Friday I heard John Fugelsang note that nobody hates Republicans in office like Republican voters, thus explaining the popularity of Trump, Carson and Fiorina.

Good thing nothing happened while I was off. Would have hated to miss it.

Were you paying attention?

1) They did it! They finally did it!. What bill did Republicans pass for the 62nd time in the House last week?

2) Duty calls! The co-chair of “Veterans For Trump” in New Hampshire left the campaign to do what?

3) What major Iowa city swore in its first black mayor last week?

4) The financial year got off to a rocky start as stock trading in what country was stopped twice to stop the downward spiral?

5) Governor Branstad proposed taking money from what source to address water quality problems?

6) Pres. Obama announced an executive order to better enforce gun laws. What Senator said his committee will look into whether such an order is legal?

7) Some of Rome’s busiest streets were closed last week so workers could wash what off the street?

8) January 10th, 1776 one of the most influential pamphlets of the revolution – “Common Sense” – was published. Who was the author?

9) North Korea claimed to have successfully tested a hydrogen bomb Wednesday. What countries have successfully tested hydrogen bombs?

10) Ben Carson must have thought he was back in middle school when he asked a group of 5th graders to point out what?

11) Many activists were calling for the arrest of Michigan’s governor for allowing lead to infiltrate what city’s water system?

12) December employment was up by 290,000 jobs. What is usually considered the break even point?

13) The teen in Texas who got off on an “affluenza” plea was arrested where after he broke probation and fled Texas?

14) What major annual exposition is in progress in Las Vegas this weekend?

15) Our ally in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, acted much like our enemies do when they did what to 47 people?

16) “Yeehadists” and “yallquieda” are among the many mocking names hung on what group by social media?

17) In Chemistry news, the 7th period of the periodic table was completed when the discovery of what was announced last week?

18) New USDA dietary guidelines targeted what two substances that they said Americans should drastically reduce in their diets?

19) Over 20 earthquakes have taken place in Oklahoma since Wednesday. These earthquakes have been directly attributed to what?

20) Roy Moore, Chief Justice in Alabama, reissued an order stopping probate judges from issuing what in contradiction to a SCOTUS ruling?

Time to start taste testing those cookies you will be taking to the caucuses.

Answers:

1) a bill defunding Obamacare. Their idea of progress

2) join the anti government protest in Oregon

3) Waterloo

4) China

5) a sales tax dedicated to schools

6) Grassley, Mr. Obstruction himself

7) bird droppings. Migrating birds eat ripening olives and leave tons of very slippery droppings.

8) Thomas Paine

9) The US, Great Britain, France, Russia (old Soviet Union) and China. Pakistan and India claims were never confirmed.

10) the worst student in their class. Many fingers pointed at one poor kid.

11) Flint, Michigan

12) adding 150,000 jobs per month

13) in Puerta Vallarta, Mexico

14) Consumer Electronics Show (CES) where all the new toys are on display

15) beheaded them, including one very important Iranian cleric

16) the anti-government armed protestors that took over a bird sanctuary in Burns, Oregon.

17) 4 new elements, numbers 113, 115, 117 and 118

18) sugar and saturated fat

19) injection of waste water from fracking wells.

20) marriage licenses for same sex couples.

From John Fugelsang: “People who say President Obama fake cried are essentially accusing him of being as indifferent to mass killings as they are.”

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Damn Gummint Edition

New Legislative Session Starts Next Week

Iowa Capitol

Iowa Capitol

One of the great pleasures of my young life was to read the incredibly droll and wry way that young Des Moines Register columnist Donald Kaul would approach the opening of the Iowa legislature every year. Kaul would then follow with three to four months of humorous observations as the legislature would often stumble and bumble through the process of making laws.

While the Iowa legislature still has many moments of stumbling and bumbling much of the humor is gone now. The consequences of many of the decisions made by the legislature are now very negative especially for Iowa’s families. The legislature does nothing these days about low wages, temp employers who exploit Iowa’s citizens in the worst way, pay day lenders, lack of daycare for women seeking employment and many other problems that beset Iowa’s poor and middle class.

What was once Iowa’s calling card across the country – the best schools in the country – are now reduced to begging a Republican led House to do the job they are supposed to do by law. Surely we can expect Republicans to once more kick school budgeting down the road in their annual attempt to make Iowa schools look bad so they can have an excuse to turn to their answer to school problems, profitized charter schools. Who can forget last year when Republicans pushed the budget to the very limit before agreeing to a small compromise. Then to see the compromise blown up by a governor who seems to see his only purpose these days as delivering goodies to Party donors.

On the school front, Branstad has already sent forth a message that he wants to start tapping a sales tax dedicated to schools to use the money for other problems. Once that dam is breached the money will flow from the schools in a flood. This is a play from the book of dismantling public schools systems that has been used by tea bag Republicans across the country. In order to use their solutions first they have to create the problems for which they have solutions. And in case you have missed it, these solutions are handed to republican legislators all written and ready to go courtesy of ALEC.

Branstad is already setting his own course by not consulting the people’s representative on such major matters as extending a tax break to businesses through a “reinterpretation” of current tax laws. Then there is his decision to close the juvenile home at Toledo in a move that appeared to be against existing laws. Of course there is the aforementioned line item veto that was a punch in the gut for most every Iowa school district.

But the coupe-de-grace for Branstad was his unilateral decision to privatize (and profitize) the running of Iowa Medicaid system. Not only did Branstad act on his own without consulting any other elected officials, the implementation has been an absolute disaster. His administration was in such a hurry to give his buddies our tax money that they didn’t even pretend to design a system or think through how it would work.

What can we expect this year from Iowa’s finest? It being an election year you can bet there will be no new taxes or even a mention of anything like that. There will no doubt be a lot of grand standing on how such and such will save Iowa big bucks. That will for the most part be malarkey. We can expect our friends at Iowa Policy Project and Progress Iowa to keep a close eye on such malarkey, but their insightful work will be mostly ignored by the corporate media and the legislators themselves.

We will probably see the usual bills to let Iowans carry more guns and do so in stores and restaurants in the open so we can join other crazy states in bringing back the old west. Probably have the bill to allow silencers on guns again too. Those will keep people from being disturbed by the noise of the gun as a mass murder takes place at the movie.

We can always hope that someday the legislature will somehow feel the pain that average working Iowans go through trying to survive on an ever shrinking income. But last I knew there were very few former wage workers in the legislature and lots of business owners. Guess where their interests lie?

Not sure even Donald Kaul could find much to laugh at these days.

Posted in ALEC, Branstad, Iowa Legislature | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on New Legislative Session Starts Next Week

TPP Open Comments End Next Wednesday

While our eyes and attention are diverted to watching and – in Iowa – participating in the 2016 presidential horse race, politicians of all stripe continue to work to pass the worst trade bill in American history.

This is an issue that is getting absolutely no coverage in the media with the exception of one very small corner. That small corner of the media is the only media that is liberal these days, aka Free Speech TV. FSTV is funded through contributions and is therefore not beholden to corporate money so they do not have to answer to a master for what they program. The corporate media has totally abandoned any discussion of TPP at all. Even when corporate media discussed TPP at all it was in a mostly positive light.

Timing for the vote on TPP has not been determined. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell back in December stated he doubted it would happen before the 2016 election. While McConnell didn’t specifically say so, the main reason for wanting such a delay is that TPP is terribly unpopular among Americans and the party that passes it will be looked on as a pariah. Bad idea to pass such a hated bill during an election year. Within the Republican Party itself the thought of passing something that President Obama is pushing for simply causes much backlash. Thus the passage of TPP is not as certain as many would think.

Whatever the politics of the issue are in congress, your chance to have any effect on it comes to a close next Wednesday. The folks over at www.flushthetpp.org have put together a how-to in going about submitting a comment.

Here’s how you do it:

1) Comments are submitted at www.regulations.gov (we suggest you open it in a new tab).

2) Enter “USTR-2015-0012” on the Home page and click “search” or you can go directly to the comment page using this link: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USTR_FRDOC_0001-0366

3) When you are taken to the comment page, click on “Comment now” on the right hand side. You will be taken to an open comment page.

4) The http://www.regulations.gov website allows users to provide comments by filling in a “Type Comment” field, or by attaching a document using an “Upload File” field. USTR prefers that comments be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is sufficient to type “See attached” in the “Type Comment” field. USTR prefers submissions in Microsoft Word (.doc) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf). If the submission is in an application other than those two, please indicate the name of the application in the “Type Comment” field.

5) Persons submitting written comments must do so in English and must identify (on the first page of the submission) “TPP Employment Impact Review.”

6) Follow the prompts on the page to complete your comment (see the information and sample comment below).

7) If you have problems, you can contact Yvonne Jamison of the USTR at (202) 395-3475.

There are also detailed information about provisions within the trade pact itself that should be commented on. At the end is an example of such a comment.

Let the powers that be know that we will not surrender American sovereignty and jobs without a fight.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) | Tagged , | Comments Off on TPP Open Comments End Next Wednesday

Why Is Iowa GOP Waging War Against Planned Parenthood?

stand with ppThis letter was sent to Republican House Speaker Linda Upmeyer and 23 other legislators, Democrat and Republican, Senate and House. I have heard back from two of the Democratic House members.

Speaker Upmeyer:

I am writing to express my disappointment in learning that the Iowa House Republicans will again attempt to defund Planned Parenthood.

As it is not likely to come to a vote in the Senate, it would seem that this is somewhat of a waste of your time and my tax dollars.

I respectfully ask for a candid answer on why this will be brought up again.

Do you have reason to think that supporters of PP will “come to their senses” this time around?

Are you concerned that the part of your base who are vocal about this are not yet convinced of your sincerity in fighting family planning?

Are you afraid that Christ Himself won’t forgive you or believe that you are personally against abortion?

What has been the depth of conversation about this with your sisters in Christ who do support both the concept of family planning and the work of Planned Parenthood?

Are you aware that less family planning services will cause more abortions in the long-term?

I realize that many people feel that using tax money for this makes them feel complicit in the actual act. Are you offering me the option of defunding or subtracting from my tax bill the cost of programs that I feel disrespect Christ’s call to be the face of mercy to those in need?

We spend extremely unbalanced amounts of money on education versus imprisoning people. What kind of society prefers vengeance for wrongs rather than providing better foundations in the first place?

What kind of society throws the poor and mentally ill under the bus to make room for financial profits?

What kind of society tolerates industries poisoning the common water and soil?

Are you hoping that we who support PP will walk away from our convictions?

Are you looking for points of compromise?

Are you willing to compromise on school funding to achieve defunding PP? Would that be worth 10% allowable growth for the next ten years?

Are you willing to mandate cooperation with the Nutrient Reduction Strategy?

Willing to raise tax revenues on wealthy people and big business?

Speaker Upmeyer, governing requires compromise. Society is better off when women can make appropriate personal choices regarding child-bearing. Society gains nothing from restricting those options.

Please do not feed the wolves of animosity and divisiveness this year for issues that won’t create jobs, or clean the water we drink.

Urging you to consider why Christ did not throw the first stone,

Laura Twing
Tipton

Posted in planned parenthood, womens rights | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Why Is Iowa GOP Waging War Against Planned Parenthood?

What Is The Difference Between A Minimum Wage Worker And You?

minimum wage workersby Jennifer Hauff

When I last lived on minimum wage, I shared a one bedroom apartment with a friend I met at work. She had a mattress and a dresser in her room. I had a bunch of blankets and pillows on the floor in the living room (although I eventually got a mattress, too). No television or stereo, just a little boom box. We ate Ramen noodles for the most part. Sometimes, as an added treat, we’d mix in a can of cream of mushroom soup to make it more filling and tasty. A sweet Filipino woman at work would always bring us exotic, delicious meals to take home. She would shake her finger at us and say, “You girls don’t eat good. Too skinny!”

It was hard to come up with money for laundry, so most of the time I washed my clothes in the bathtub and hung them up to dry. But the socks were always difficult, so after hanging them all night I would use a hair dryer to finish the job.

That was 19 years ago.

In that time, minimum wage has increased from $5.15 to $7.25. A huge, whopping increase of $ 2.10. There are a few other things that have also changed since 1997. The average cost of hamburger was $2.80 a pound in 1997; it was $5.43 per pound in 2015. The average cost of a loaf of bread was 87 cents in 1997; it was $2.30 in 2015. The average cost of a dozen Large, Grade A eggs was $1.06 in 1997; it was $2.68 in 2015.

Even if you can afford food, utilities, and fun stuff like toilet paper, the idea of entertainment is pretty much out the window. If you and your family went to a movie in 1997 it would have cost around $4.59 per ticket. Today that same ticket will cost you somewhere around $8.12.

Obviously these numbers don’t reflect everybody’s locale, but it is an overall nationwide average. If you don’t believe the numbers, go to your local grocery store and closely pay attention to what you were paying then versus now.

Right now, I often hear $10.00/hour as the number being suggested as a new minimum wage, and I can tell you this – it isn’t much of a living wage either. It’s enough for you to sustain. You can pay your bills, afford enough food for at least one whole meal a day, put enough gas in the car to get to work and back for the week…and that’s about it.

If our corporations hadn’t been given incentives by the government to ship our jobs overseas, all you naysayers wouldn’t be able to look down upon the ‘unskilled’ and ‘ignorant’ adults working fast food because they would still have their old job! In my opinion, all that shows is tenacity and a willingness to do what it takes to survive. Each working American spends 2,000+ hours of time at work each year. There is no reason people should live in sickening poverty, be forced to live off government assistance because gigantic corporations are coddled like babies.

And for everyone else that still isn’t convinced: You know the only difference between you and everyone else seeking a living wage? You’re lucky enough to have a job that hasn’t been shipped to India or China. Yet.

Jennifer Hauff lives in Keokuk and  is a single parent, with an Associate Degree in Criminal Justice, currently working as a temp.

Posted in economic inequality, Economy, minimum wage | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

What President Obama Did (Hint: The Second Amendment Is Safe)

president obamaBackground checks, enforcement of current laws, improving gun safety technology, better mental health treatment and reporting.

Read this and see if you still think President Obama is coming after your guns.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/04/fact-sheet-new-executive-actions-reduce-gun-violence

Gun violence has taken a heartbreaking toll on too many communities across the country. Over the past decade in America, more than 100,000 people have been killed as a result of gun violence—and millions more have been the victim of assaults, robberies, and other crimes involving a gun. Many of these crimes were committed by people who never should have been able to purchase a gun in the first place. Over the same period, hundreds of thousands of other people in our communities committed suicide with a gun and nearly half a million people suffered other gun injuries. Hundreds of law enforcement officers have been shot to death protecting their communities. And too many children are killed or injured by firearms every year, often by accident. The vast majority of Americans—including the vast majority of gun owners—believe we must take sensible steps to address these horrible tragedies.

The President and Vice President are committed to using every tool at the Administration’s disposal to reduce gun violence. Some of the gaps in our country’s gun laws can only be fixed through legislation, which is why the President continues to call on Congress to pass the kind of commonsense gun safety reforms supported by a majority of the American people. And while Congress has repeatedly failed to take action and pass laws that would expand background checks and reduce gun violence, today, building on the significant steps that have already been taken over the past several years, the Administration is announcing a series of commonsense executive actions designed to:

1. Keep guns out of the wrong hands through background checks.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is making clear that it doesn’t matter where you conduct your business—from a store, at gun shows, or over the Internet: If you’re in the business of selling firearms, you must get a license and conduct background checks.

ATF is finalizing a rule to require background checks for people trying to buy some of the most dangerous weapons and other items through a trust, corporation, or other legal entity.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch has sent a letter to States highlighting the importance of receiving complete criminal history.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is overhauling the background check system to make it more effective and efficient. The envisioned improvements include processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and improving notification of local authorities when certain prohibited persons unlawfully attempt to buy a gun. The FBI will hire more than 230 additional examiners and other staff to help process these background checks.

2. Make our communities safer from gun violence.

The Attorney General convened a call with U.S. Attorneys around the country to direct federal prosecutors to continue to focus on smart and effective enforcement of our gun laws.

The President’s FY2017 budget will include funding for 200 new ATF agents and investigators to help enforce our gun laws.

ATF has established an Internet Investigation Center to track illegal online firearms trafficking and is dedicating $4 million and additional personnel to enhance the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network.

ATF is finalizing a rule to ensure that dealers who ship firearms notify law enforcement if their guns are lost or stolen in transit.

The Attorney General issued a memo encouraging every U.S. Attorney’s Office to renew domestic violence outreach efforts.

3. Increase mental health treatment and reporting to the background check system.

The Administration is proposing a new $500 million investment to increase access to mental health care.

The Social Security Administration has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to include information in the background check system about beneficiaries who are prohibited from possessing a firearm for mental health reasons.

The Department of Health and Human Services is finalizing a rule to remove unnecessary legal barriers preventing States from reporting relevant information about people prohibited from possessing a gun for specific mental health reasons.

4. Shape the future of gun safety technology.

The President has directed the Departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security to conduct or sponsor research into gun safety technology.

The President has also directed the departments to review the availability of smart gun technology on a regular basis, and to explore potential ways to further its use and development to more broadly improve gun safety.

Congress should support the President’s request for resources for 200 new ATF agents and investigators to help enforce our gun laws, as well as a new $500 million investment to address mental health issues.

Because we all must do our part to keep our communities safe, the Administration is also calling on States and local governments to do all they can to keep guns out of the wrong hands and reduce gun violence. It is also calling on private-sector leaders to follow the lead of other businesses that have taken voluntary steps to make it harder for dangerous individuals to get their hands on a gun. In the coming weeks, the Administration will engage with manufacturers, retailers, and other private-sector leaders to explore what more they can do.

New Actions by the Federal Government

Keeping Guns Out of the Wrong Hands Through Background Checks

The most important thing we can do to prevent gun violence is to make sure those who would commit violent acts cannot get a firearm in the first place. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), which was created by Congress to prevent guns from being sold to prohibited individuals, is a critical tool in achieving that goal. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the background check system has prevented more than 2 million guns from getting into the wrong hands. We know that making the system more efficient, and ensuring that it has all appropriate records about prohibited purchasers, will help enhance public safety. Today, the Administration is announcing the following executive actions to ensure that all gun dealers are licensed and run background checks, and to strengthen the background check system itself:

 – Clarify that it doesn’t matter where you conduct your business—from a store, at gun shows, or over the Internet: If you’re in the business of selling firearms, you must get a license and conduct background checks. Background checks have been shown to keep guns out of the wrong hands, but too many gun sales—particularly online and at gun shows—occur without basic background checks. Today, the Administration took action to ensure that anyone who is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms is licensed and conducts background checks on their customers. Consistent with court rulings on this issue, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has clarified the following principles:

 – A person can be engaged in the business of dealing in firearms regardless of the location in which firearm transactions are conducted. For example, a person can be engaged in the business of dealing in firearms even if the person only conducts firearm transactions at gun shows or through the  Internet. Those engaged in the business of dealing in firearms who utilize the Internet or other technologies must obtain a license, just as a dealer whose business is run out of a traditional brick-and-mortar store.

 – Quantity and frequency of sales are relevant indicators. There is no specific threshold number of firearms purchased or sold that triggers the licensure requirement. But it is important to note that even a few transactions, when combined with other evidence, can be sufficient to establish that a person is “engaged in the business.” For example, courts have upheld convictions for dealing without a license when as few as two firearms were sold or when only one or two transactions took place, when other factors also were present.

 – There are criminal penalties for failing to comply with these requirements. A person who willfully engages in the business of dealing in firearms without the required license is subject to criminal prosecution and can be sentenced up to five years in prison and fined up to $250,000. Dealers are also subject to penalties for failing to conduct background checks before completing a sale.

 – Require background checks for people trying to buy some of the most dangerous weapons and other items through a trust or corporation. The National Firearms Act imposes restrictions on sales of some of the most dangerous weapons, such as machine guns and sawed-off shotguns. But because of outdated regulations, individuals have been able to avoid the background check requirement by applying to acquire these firearms and other items through trusts, corporations, and other legal entities. In fact, the number of these applications has increased significantly over the years—from fewer than 900 applications in the year 2000 to more than 90,000 applications in 2014. ATF is finalizing a rule that makes clear that people will no longer be able to avoid background checks by buying NFA guns and other items through a trust or corporation.

 – Ensure States are providing records to the background check system, and work cooperatively with jurisdictions to improve reporting. Congress has prohibited specific categories of people from buying guns—from convicted felons to users of illegal drugs to individuals convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence. In the wake of the shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007, Congress also created incentives for States to make as many relevant records as possible accessible to NICS. Over the past three years, States have increased the number of records they make accessible by nearly 70 percent. To further encourage this reporting, the Attorney General has written a letter to States highlighting the importance of receiving complete criminal history records and criminal dispositions, information on persons disqualified for mental health reasons, and qualifying crimes of domestic violence. The Administration will begin a new dialogue with States to ensure the background check system is as robust as possible, which is a public safety imperative.

  – Make the background check system more efficient and effective. In 2015, NICS received more than 22.2 million background check requests, an average of more than 63,000 per day. By law, a gun dealer can complete a sale to a customer if the background check comes back clean or has taken more than three days to complete. But features of the current system, which was built in the 1990s, are outdated. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will take the following steps to ensure NICS operates more efficiently and effectively to keep guns out of the wrong hands:

 – FBI will hire more than 230 additional NICS examiners and other staff members to assist with processing mandatory background checks. This new hiring will begin immediately and increase the existing workforce by 50 percent. This will reduce the strain on the NICS system and improve its ability to identify dangerous people who are prohibited from buying a gun before the transfer of a firearm is completed.

 – FBI has partnered with the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) to modernize NICS. Although NICS has been routinely upgraded since its launch in 1998, the FBI is committed to making the system more efficient and effective, so that as many background checks as possible are fully processed within the three-day period before a dealer can legally sell a gun even if a background check is not complete. The improvements envisioned by FBI and USDS include processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to improve overall response time and improving notification of local authorities when certain prohibited persons unlawfully attempt to purchase a firearm.

Making Our Communities Safer from Gun Violence

In order to improve public safety, we need to do more to ensure smart and effective enforcement of our gun laws and make sure that criminals and other prohibited persons cannot get their hands on lost or stolen weapons. The Administration is therefore taking the following actions:

 – Ensure smart and effective enforcement of our gun laws. In a call earlier today, the Attorney General discussed the importance of today’s announcements and directed the Nation’s 93 U.S. Attorneys across the country to continue to focus their resources—as they have for the past several years under the Department’s Smart on Crime initiative—on the most impactful cases, including those targeting violent offenders, illegal firearms traffickers, and dangerous individuals who bypass the background check system to acquire weapons illegally. During the call, the Attorney General also emphasized ongoing initiatives to assist communities in combating violent crime, including ATF’s efforts to target the “worst of the worst” gun crimes. These efforts will also complement the following actions announced today:

 – The President’s budget for FY2017 will include funding for 200 new ATF agents and investigators who can help enforce our gun laws, including the measures announced today. Strategic and impactful enforcement will help take violent criminals off the street, deter other unlawful activity, and prevent guns from getting into the wrong hands.

 – ATF is dedicating $4 million and additional personnel to enhance the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN). The NIBIN database includes ballistic evidence that can be used by analysts and investigators to link violent crimes across jurisdictions and to track down shooters who prey on our communities. In February 2016, ATF is standing up the National NIBIN Correlation and Training Center—which will ultimately provide NIBIN matching services at one national location, rather than requiring local police departments to do that work themselves. The Center will provide consistent and capable correlation services, making connections between ballistic crime scene evidence and crime guns locally, regionally, and nationally. These enhancements will support ATF’s crime gun intelligence and enforcement efforts, particularly in communities most affected by violent crime.

 – ATF has established an Internet Investigations Center (IIC) staffed with federal agents, legal counsel, and investigators to track illegal online firearms trafficking and to provide actionable intelligence to agents in the field. The IIC has already identified a number of significant traffickers operating over the Internet. This work has led to prosecutions against individuals or groups using the “dark net” to traffic guns to criminals or attempting to buy firearms illegally online.

Ensure that dealers notify law enforcement about the theft or loss of their guns. Under current law, federal firearms dealers and other licensees must report when a gun from their inventory has been lost or stolen. The regulations are ambiguous, however, about who has this responsibility when a gun is lost or stolen in transit. Many lost and stolen guns end up being used in crimes. Over the past five years, an average of 1,333 guns recovered in criminal investigations each year were traced back to a licensee that claimed it never received the gun even though it was never reported lost or stolen either. Today, ATF issued a final rule clarifying that the licensee shipping a gun is responsible for notifying law enforcement upon discovery that it was lost or stolen in transit.

Issue a memo directing every U.S. Attorney’s Office to renew domestic violence outreach efforts. In the event of an emergency, victims of domestic violence should call 911 or otherwise contact state or local law enforcement officials, who have a broader range of options for responding to these crimes. To provide an additional resource for state, local, and tribal law enforcement and community groups focused on domestic violence, the Attorney General is issuing a memo directing U.S. Attorney’s Offices around the country to engage in renewed efforts to coordinate with these groups to help combat domestic violence and to prevent prohibited persons from obtaining firearms.

Increase Mental Health Treatment and Reporting to the Background Check System

The Administration is committed to improving care for Americans experiencing mental health issues. In the last seven years, our country has made extraordinary progress in expanding mental health coverage for millions of Americans. This includes the Affordable Care Act’s end to insurance company discrimination based on pre-existing conditions, required coverage of mental health and substance use disorder services in the individual and small group markets, and an expansion of mental health and substance use disorder parity policies, all of which are estimated to help more than 60 million Americans. About 13.5 million more Americans have gained Medicaid coverage since October 2013, significantly improving access to mental health care. And thanks to more than $100 million in funding from the Affordable Care Act, community health centers have expanded behavioral health services for nearly 900,000 people nationwide over the past two years. We must continue to remove the stigma around mental illness and its treatment—and make sure that these individuals and their families know they are not alone. While individuals with mental illness are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators, incidents of violence continue to highlight a crisis in America’s mental health system. In addition to helping people get the treatment they need, we must make sure we keep guns out of the hands of those who are prohibited by law from having them. Today, the Administration is announcing the following steps to help achieve these goals:

 – Dedicate significant new resources to increase access to mental health care. Despite our recent significant gains, less than half of children and adults with diagnosable mental health problems receive the treatment they need. To address this, the Administration is proposing a new $500 million investment to help engage individuals with serious mental illness in care, improve access to care by increasing service capacity and the behavioral health workforce, and ensure that behavioral health care systems work for everyone. This effort would increase access to mental health services to protect the health of children and communities, prevent suicide, and promote mental health as a top priority.

 – Include information from the Social Security Administration in the background check system about beneficiaries who are prohibited from possessing a firearm. Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, is expected to require will cover appropriate records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, and are unable to manage those benefits because of their mental impairment, or who have been found by a state or federal court to be legally incompetent. The rulemaking will also provide a mechanism for people to seek relief from the federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health.

 – Remove unnecessary legal barriers preventing States from reporting relevant information to the background check system. Although States generally report criminal history information to NICS, many continue to report little information about individuals who are prohibited by Federal law from possessing or receiving a gun for specific mental health reasons. Some State officials raised concerns about whether such reporting would be precluded by the Privacy Rule issued under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Today, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a final rule expressly permitting certain HIPAA covered entities to provide to the NICS limited demographic and other necessary information about these individuals.

Shaping the Future of Gun Safety Technology

Tens of thousands of people are injured or killed by firearms every year—in many cases by guns that were sold legally but then stolen, misused, or discharged accidentally. Developing and promoting technology that would help prevent these tragedies is an urgent priority. America has done this in many other areas—from making cars safer to improving the tablets and phones we use every day. We know that researchers and engineers are already exploring ideas for improving gun safety and the tracing of lost or stolen guns. Millions of dollars have already been invested to support research into concepts that range from fingerprint scanners to radio-frequency identification to microstamping technology.

As the single largest purchaser of firearms in the country, the Federal Government has a unique opportunity to advance this research and ensure that smart gun technology becomes a reality—and it is possible to do so in a way that makes the public safer and is consistent with the Second Amendment. Today, the President is taking action to further this work in the following way:

Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security to take two important steps to promote smart gun technology.

 – Increase research and development efforts. The Presidential Memorandum directs the departments to conduct or sponsor research into gun safety technology that would reduce the frequency of accidental discharge or unauthorized use of firearms, and improve the tracing of lost or stolen guns. Within 90 days, these agencies must prepare a report outlining a research-and-development strategy designed to expedite the real-world deployment of such technology for use in practice.

 – Promote the use and acquisition of new technology. The Presidential Memorandum also directs the departments to review the availability of smart gun technology on a regular basis, and to explore potential ways to further its use and development to more broadly improve gun safety. In connection with these efforts, the departments will consult with other agencies that acquire firearms and take appropriate steps to consider whether including such technology in specifications for acquisition of firearms would be consistent with operational needs.

 

Posted in gun control | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on What President Obama Did (Hint: The Second Amendment Is Safe)

Four Democrats Take On Grassley

May as well be in Iowa cutting grass

There are four Iowa Democrats challenging Chuck Grassley for U.S. Senator.  Grassley and Ernst are part of  the right-wing of the Republican party, obstructing President Obama on everything, not caring whether it would benefit America and Iowa or not.

For example,

In the Judiciary Committee, Chairman Chuck Grassley delays confirmation hearings and committee votes for every nominee, even consensus nominees with bipartisan support. In some cases, Grassley is helped by Republican Senators who initially endorse a nominee from their home state, but then withhold approval—expressed by the return of a “blue slip” to the committee—that would allow a confirmation hearing.   http://www.afj.org/reports/politics-over-justice-judicial-selection-in-the-114th-congress

If he’s not going to do anything, he may as well be back in Iowa mowing grass…or shoveling snow.

Check out these Democratic challengers’ Facebook pages and websites and follow them on Twitter.  Pick a candidate and get behind them.

Tom Fiegen

Tom Fiegen

Facebook

– Twitter

– Website

 

 

State Senator Rob Hogg

State Senator Rob Hogg

Facebook

– Twitter

– Website

 

 

Bob Krause

Bob Krause

Facebook

– Twitter

– Website

 

 

Ray-Zirkelbach-350x245Ray Zirkelbach

Facebook

– Website

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Four Democrats Take On Grassley

Kochs, Right-Wingers Set Their Greedy Sights On America’s Federal Land

kochs-bundy

It is outrageous that the mainstream media (CNN) and other news outlets are referring to the right-wing nut job terrorists in Oregon who have broken into and taken over a federal building at a wildlife refuge as “protestors.”  Excuse me, but aren’t “protestors,” supposed to be in a designated protest area, singing songs, carrying signs, etc?

So what is it all about?  This Media Matters article was written last year, long before the current domestic terrorism situation. Click here to donate to MediaMatters.org.

mediamatters.org/blog/

Bundy and Hannity’s promotion of state ownership of federal lands gives airtime to an issue that conservatives have long been campaigning for but have had difficulty getting voters excited about — an issue in line with the land interests of the Koch brothers. Slate reported that the Fox News corporate, financial, and political interests being served by Hannity’s promotion of Bundy lie in the network’s connection to the Koch brothers:

Bundy’s anti-federal agenda is closely aligned with that of Charles and David Koch, major Republican donors who have been pushing for states to gain control over federal lands – so they can be sold or leased to people like the Koch brothers in deals.

Fox News Network and Sean Hannity have a particular interest in the promotion and realization of such Koch interests because their funding depends on it — Hannity receives major funding and large ad buys from Koch-affiliated Heritage and Tea Party Patriots.

Hannity’s Koch-affiliated funders have a long history of promoting the privatization of public lands and condemning the federal ownership of land. Tea Party groups have supported local efforts to transfer federal lands. Heritage has advocated shrinking the U.S. government’s control by selling its physical assets such as “huge swaths of land (especially out west).” Heritage was also a loyal promoter of the Federal Land Freedom Act of 2013, advocating for the transfer of federal land management to state regulators for energy resource development.

(click here to read the entire article)

Posted in Koch Brothers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Kochs, Right-Wingers Set Their Greedy Sights On America’s Federal Land