Election Prospects for Republicans and Democrats in the November 2018 Elections

by Ralph Scharnau

The upcoming 2018 United States elections will mainly occur on November 6. These midterm elections include races at the local, state, and federal levels. Nationwide all House seats and a third of those in the Senate will be up for election.

At the moment, Republicans control both houses of Congress and the White House. What are the chances that the Republican dominated House and Senate could be flipped into the Democratic column during the 2018 fall election cycle? A number of factors come into play here, and the outcomes are far from clear.

Polling conducted in the middle of January asking respondents about their preferences in the November congressional elections showed that Democrats held leads over Republicans ranging from a few percentage points to double digits. In the highly respected Pew Research Center poll of all registered voters, 53 percent said they support or lean toward the Democratic Party as opposed to only 39 percent for the Republicans. The Democrats also did well among African Americans (88 percent), Hispanics (67 percent) and women (55 percent). Democrats also received strong support from the young, those between the ages of 18 and 49.

Mobilizing this Democratic Party base remains the key to electoral victories.

Ralph Scharnau is a retired professor of U.S. History.   He holds a Ph.D. from Northern Illinois University.  His teaching career at public and private higher education institutions has spanned some fifty years.  His publications include articles on labor history in Iowa and Dubuque.  Scharnau, a peace and justice activist, writes monthly op-ed columns for the Dubuque Telegraph Herald.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Election Prospects for Republicans and Democrats in the November 2018 Elections

Computer Scientist Barbara Simons Proves How Easy It Is To Hack Elections—And How It Can Be Stopped

barbara simonEditor’s note: I stumbled on this diary on dailykos.com the other day. Dailykos has a policy of allowing full reprints of their articles provided they are given full acknowledgment. This diary is a good summation of the horrible mess that HAVA and subsequent  changes have wrought.  As you well know the Republican Party will NOT do one damn thing to fix the problems:

By Leslie Salzillo

In 2016, American election systems in 39 states were reportedly hacked and/or compromised by corrupt leaders in office and by foreign and domestic entities. How that corruption affected election results is still unknown—and may remain unknown given there’s proof that hacking can be done—without leaving a trace.

So, how safe will our voting systems be in the upcoming midterm elections? Switching from electronic/paperless voting ballots back to paper ballots is being discussed more and more and may be the only way to ensure the fairest midterm elections. One computer scientist has been a longtime relentless advocate for bringing paper ballots back to all states and exposing the perils of electronic paperless ballots. That scientist is Barbara Simons. She is a former President of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), the nation’s largest educational and scientific computing society, and the first and only woman to have received the Distinguished Engineering Alumni Award from the College of Engineering of U.C. Berkeley, where she earned her Ph.D. in computer science. Jill Leovy with The Atlantic reports on the story:

For years, Barbara Simons was the loneliest of Cassandras—a technologist who feared what technology had wrought. Her cause was voting: Specifically, she believed that the electronic systems that had gained favor in the United States after the 2000 presidential election were shoddy, and eminently hackable. She spent years publishing opinion pieces in obscure journals with titles like Municipal World and sending hectoring letters to state officials, always written with the same clipped intensity.

Simons, a liberal, has written books that examined voting systems. Previously, prominent progresssive organizations like ACLU and the American League of Women Voters worked against Simons and her push for paper ballots. They believed paper ballots removed the opportunity for more people with disabilities to vote. While that is a valid point, a greater concern, Simons sees, is that paperless ballots are leaving whole elections at risk. In the past, Simons has been treated poorly. At one conference, the American League of Women Voters tried to yank the microphone from hands not wanting her to continue pointing out her views and fears.

Freely speaking her mind in public today no longer poses a problem for Simons. In July she packed a room at the annual Def Con Hacker Conference in Las Vegas. She told the audience. “I lose sleep over this. I hope you will too.” She conducted an experiment.

Four voting machines had been secured for the event, three of them types still in use. One team of hackers used radio signals to eavesdrop on a machine as it recorded votes. Another found a master password online. Within hours of getting their hands on the machines, the hackers had discovered vulnerabilities in all four.

That afternoon, Simons was surrounded by reporters. She told USA Today, “Anything that’s happening in here, you can be sure [it’s something] that those intent on undermining the integrity of our election systems have already done.”

According to the Department of Homeland Security, those efforts included attempts to meddle with the electoral process in 21 states. At the same time, a series of highly publicized hacks—at Sony, Equifax, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management—has driven home the reality that very few computerized systems are truly secure.

Simons has now garnered the respect of state officials and the aforementioned progressive organizations. They are finally listening.

Considered a voting expert, Barbara Simons currently helps to run Verified Voting and says she wishes she was wrong about election hacking. She believes the databases of voter registrations were targeted by Russia in the 2016 elections adding, “Our democracy is in peril.” In her warning, she stresses that with cyber security, you have to protect against everything—but your opponent only has to find one vulnerability.

Simons relays some good news in that we have a single technology at our disposal that is invulnerable to hacking, and that is—paper,  Her goal, and that of Verified Voting, is to get paper ballots back into every state.

By Verified Voting’s count, 13 states, including populous ones such as Pennsylvania and New Jersey, still have paperless voting. Given the thin majorities in Congress, that leaves more than enough machines to allow hackers tremendous power to influence American politics. And all 50 states use computerized scanners for vote counting—few of them with sufficient postelection auditing to detect manipulation. Mandatory audits, in the form of hand counts of randomized samplings of ballots, are essential to protect against invisible vote theft, Simons believes. In an unaudited system, malicious code could easily go unnoticed. “It’s not rocket science,” she said. “Any halfway-decent programmer could do it.”

For more on this subject, read Leovy’s full and extensive piece in the Atlantic, HERE—it’s well worth the time.

As said again and again— it matters not how good our candidates are or how many people show up to the polls to vote during the upcoming Midterms; if our votes are compromised, hacked and/or dis.    counted, we stand to lose and could end up with a Republican majority continuing to hold the majority in Congress. And without a Democratic House majority to start impeachment proceedings, we could end up with the re-election of Donald Trump. This is a risk that causes most Americans who voted against Trump—to shudder. This a risk that causes many around the world to shudder. Since there is not enough time to protect our upcoming elections against hacking, there is enough time for a Simon’s simple solution—switch to paper ballots. 

For more information about Verified Voting, click HERE.

Barbara Simons is a former President of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), the nation’s largest educational and scientific computing society. She is the only woman to have received the Distinguished Engineering Alumni Award from the College of Engineering of U.C. Berkeley, where she earned her Ph.D. in computer science. A fellow of ACM and of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, she also received the Computing Research Association Distinguished Service Award and the Electronic Frontier Foundation Pioneer Award. An expert on electronic voting, she published Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count?, a book on voting machines co-authored with Douglas Jones. She has been on the Board of Advisors of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission since 2008, and she co-authored the report that led to the cancellation of Department of Defense’s Internet voting project (SERVE) in 2004 because of security concerns. She was a member of the National Workshop on Internet Voting, convened by President Clinton, that conducted one of the first studies of Internet Voting and produced a report in 2001. She co-authored the July 2015 report of the U.S. Vote Foundation entitled The Future of Voting: End-to-End Verifiable Internet Voting.  She is retired from IBM Research.

 

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, Vote Fraud, voter suppression, voting rights | Tagged | Comments Off on Computer Scientist Barbara Simons Proves How Easy It Is To Hack Elections—And How It Can Be Stopped

America’s War On Kids

video 4 minutes, not safe for work

Seems like there has always been a war on kids in this country. However, since Nixon’s brilliant strategy of getting back at the hippies and blacks for their part in the civil rights movements and the anti-war movement there has been little doubt that kids are something to be controlled, manipulated and ignored.

Now, with friends and family dying in front of them, the kids are standing up and saying “No More!” Today’s kids are showing that unlike generations before they are not going to be ignored and manipulated into eventually following along. Showing signs that the oligarchs are not going to be able to control these kids is sending shudders through the ruling oligarchs.

Expect the ruling class to start to come down hard when these kids assert themselves this week with the mass school walkout this week followed by the mass marches across the country on Saturday, March 24th.      

Let’s get out there and back them up and help send the message loud and strong: Enough is Enough. 

We as a society can put a stop to the gun violence. 

We can put an end to the careers of politicians who march to the drums of the NRA.

We must be a civilized society, not a nation of locked doors with everyone armed to the teeth.

Not One More!

Let’s march.

Then let’s check our voting registration.

Then let’s everyone resolve to give a couple hours a week to volunteer on campaigns for candidates who support sensible gun laws this summer and fall.

Then let’s make sure we vote. Even better, let’s vote early so we will know if our registration is valid and our vote will count. Then if there is a problem there may be time to fix it.

Then let’s make sure our friends have voted.

Remember the gun sellers and the gun lobby doesn’t give a crap about your kids or their lives. They only care about selling guns. WE CAN STOP THEM!

You have the power. For the sake of your kids and grandkids, for your neighbors kids and your friends kids, this is the time to stand up and be counted.

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, gun control, gun safety | Comments Off on America’s War On Kids

Sunday Funday: High Holy Days Of Basketball Are Upon Us

Image (1) girls-basketball-300x224.jpeg for post 36576

Readers of this column know that there are some things that your friendly quizmaster holds sacred. Basketball tournament time is time to shut down and bathe in the glow of some great games, some upsets and the buzzer beaters.

We know that sports is not real life, but some times real life can grind you into dust, especially with the Dear Leader and his minions robbing the common people blind. So for a couple weeks a year, the tournaments gives us a chance to escape into the games just as our ancient ancestors did.

Right now, I think Michigan looks good. Probably a kiss of death.

Meanwhile the real world continues to read like the most outrageous novel ever written.

  1. Dear Leader unilaterally imposed tariffs on what two commodities?
  1. What former aid to Dear Leader astounded TV audiences with a meltdown on air Monday claiming he would defy a subpoena?
  1. Well it is Women’s History Month. Who was the first American woman to win a Nobel Peace Prize?
  1. The confirmation of Iowa DHS Director is being held up by Iowa senate Democrats over what issue?
  1. Seneca Falls New York has a special place in American Women’s history because what happened there?
  1. Mississippi imposed a ban on abortions after how many weeks, becoming the shortest window in the country?
  1. MSNBC commentator and former W Bush White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter formed an exploratory senate committee in what state?
  1. Current Counselor to the President(?) Kellyanne Conway was cited Tuesday by the Office of Special Council with violations of what law by “advocation for and against candidates”?
  1. Gee our governor finally woke up to realize that a trade war would devastate what sector of the economy?
  1. Photographers may get the chance to photograph the two worst haircuts in the world in May when what two world leaders meet?
  1. Ready for another depression? Looks like congress is ready to pull back some of the restrictions on banks in what 2010 law?
  1. What supposedly red state saw a huge increase in voters on the Democratic side Tuesday?
  1. The owner of what NFL franchise declared Tuesday that “all player will be standing for the national anthem”?
  1. Canada unveiled its new $10 note on Thursday. What 2 things were different about it?
  1. The very aptly named Sally Ride was America’s first woman to do what?
  1. What state finally settled a teacher’s strike by granting a 5% wage increase?
  1. “Inclusion rider” was the ending words of what academy award winner’s speech last Sunday night?
  1. What airline replaced its bonus program for employees with a hokey big-prize lottery system for employees?
  1. The brother of what cabinet member is undergoing scrutiny for his role in a secret meeting in the Seychelles islands in January 2017?
  1. What “man of mystery” from that Seychelles islands meeting has been cooperating with the Special Counsel and is seen as a key witness?

Sam Bee – 7 minutes probably not safe for work:

Answers:

  1. Steel and aluminum
  1. Sam Nunberg (a one man March Madness)
  1. Jane Addams
  1. Privatized medicaid system
  1. The first women’s convention in 1848
  1. 15 weeks
  1. Minnesota
  1. The Hatch Act
  1. Agriculture.
  1. Dear leader from PRNK and Dear Leader of the USA
  1. Dodd-Franks
  1. Texas
  1. Miami Dolphins – didn’t say what he’d do if they did though
  1. 1) first woman (Viola Desmond) to appear on a note and 2) it will be oriented lengthwise
  1. Go into space
  1. West Virginia
  1. Frances McDormand
  1. United – screws employees out of $71million a year in bonuses
  1. Eric Prince brother of Betsy DeVoss
  1. George Nader

One more Sam Bee 7 minutes- not safe for work:

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: High Holy Days Of Basketball Are Upon Us

MEMO: Republicans Wage War on Women’s Health Care

Image (3) one-thing-womens-bodies-can-shut-down.jpg for post 14400

Editor’s note: This extremely important analysis of the Republican war on women’s health care arrived in email on International Women’s Day. This should be a major consideration when you vote this fall:

To: Interested Parties

From: Matt Sinovic, Progress Iowa

Date: March 8, 2018

RE: Republicans Wage War on Women’s Health Care

On International Women’s Day, we commemorate the work done to move forward equality, and the removal of barriers for achievements by women in Iowa and all over the world. And while there is a lot to celebrate, there are unfortunately elected officials who have made it their mission to wage war on women’s health care.

David Young, Rod Blum, and Steve King have joined with President Trump in waging war on women’s health care. Their policies and votes in Congress put women last, profits first, raise costs for coverage, and limit access to quality health care. 

Protect Our Care has identified a number of ways that the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress have attacked women’s health care:

Allowing Insurance Companies To Charge Women More Than Men: Before the Affordable Care Act, insurers on the individual market charged women up to 1.5 times as much as they charged men, known as gender rating. 92 percent of plans in this market practiced gender rating before the ACA. The ACA said women and men had to be charged the same. Now, the Trump Administration wants to go back to the days when women could be charged more. Under the Trump Administration’s recent “short-term, limited duration” rule, insurers would be able to skirt the ACA’s gender rating provision that banned insurers from charging different rates for men and women.

Allowing Insurance Companies To Discriminate Because Of A Pre-existing Condition: The Affordable Care Act said that insurers could no longer deny, drop, or charge more because of a pre-existing condition like cancer, or even, having a C-section. Nearly 30 million women have a pre-existing condition that would have made them uninsurable before the ACA. The Trump Administration’s new “short-term, limited duration” plan allows insurers to discriminate because of a pre-existing condition, causing costs for people with a pre-existing conditions to rise. What this means is a relatively healthy woman could opt for these lesser plans, but develop a condition that might not be covered. For example, studies show one in three women will develop some type of cancer over their life. Women have a 40 percent chance of developing diabetes. For Hispanic women, the chance of developing diabetes is as high as 50 percent.

Making Maternity Coverage More Expensive For Women: Before the Affordable Care Act, 75 percent of individual market plans did not cover delivery and inpatient care for maternity care, and only 11 states required maternity coverage in their individual and small-group markets. The ACA made maternity coverage one of its “essential health benefits,” meaning plans had to include that benefit. The Trump Administration and its Republican allies wants to roll back that progress. They repeatedly offer ways to waive the “essential health benefits” – through their partisan repeal bills, short-term limited duration plans, and association health plans – meaning these plans would not have to meet the requirements of the ACA. A women who purchases maternity coverage separately would have to pay roughly $1,000 more per month. And under the House-passed repeal bill, states were allowed to eliminate community rating, meaning insurers would be able to charge people with pre-existing conditions more. This surcharge could cost women $17,060 for a pregnancy,

Defunding Planned Parenthood:  In January 2018, the Trump Administration announced it would be rolling back an Obama Administration guidance that warned states not to carve Planned Parenthood out of their Medicaid providers, signaling support for state efforts to place even higher barriers in the way of women’s access to health care. And we later learned the Trump Administration did this with the help of a conservative group. The Republican health repeal bills in Congress proposed eliminating federal funding for Planned Parenthood as well.

Taking Direct Aim At Birth Control: The Trump Administration’s proposed rule to let any employer opt out of offering health insurance that covers birth control rolls back the Affordable Care Act’s guarantee that women may access copay-free contraception.

Attempting To Gut Medicaid: Medicaid is lifeline for millions of women, not only their health care but their employment. The Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans’ partisan repeal efforts in 2017 would have ended Medicaid as we know it. The House-passed repeal bill cut Medicaid by more than $800 billion, or 25 percent. President Trump’s recent budget cut Medicaid by more than $1 trillion over the next decade. Nearly 13 million women of reproductive age (15-44) rely on Medicaid, including 31 percent of African-American women in this age group and 27 percent of similar Hispanic women. Moreover, 22.8 percent of women in the workforce are employed in the health industry. These cuts to Medicaid could put their job at risk.

Putting Onerous New Requirements On Medicaid, Making Some New Moms Have To Choose Between Working Or Risking Their Care: Almost two-thirds, or 62 percent, of those who would lose their Medicaid coverage as a result of work requirements are women, and disproportionately women of color. One reason is women are more likely to be the caregivers for other sick family members, including children or their parents. And women are more likely to be in jobs that do not provide health coverage. What this means is that a new mom would have 60 days to find health coverage after giving birth or risk their family’s health coverage.

Stacking Federal Courts With Anti-choice Judges: For the next generation, American women will face the threat posed by an increasingly anti-choice federal judiciary. 12 of Trump’s judicial nominees were appointed to circuit courts during his first year – more than any other first-year president in American history.

Reversing Progress Against Breast Cancer: Republicans’ repeated attempts to undermine the Affordable Care Act’s essential health benefits threaten landmark progress in women’s preventive health. New research finds that the Affordable Care Act requirement that plans (including Medicare) must cover recommended preventive care without a copay led to a significant increase in the number of women receiving mammography screenings.

Image (1) progress-iowa.jpg for post 17381

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, womens rights | Tagged , | Comments Off on MEMO: Republicans Wage War on Women’s Health Care

Backfill Cut Is BS

Image (3) soul-of-the-republican-party.jpg for post 25972

Editor’s note: This ‘on the money’ rant from a friend landed in my mailbox on Friday morning. It is quite self explanatory

You can email your legislator and urge them to vote NO on SF 2081- backfill elimination bill.

Backfill? You ask.. I keep hearing the term in regards to funding and taxes. So I dug in and found out..

Do you use the roads? Rely on street lights? The sewers? Parks? Public Schools? Glad to have fire and police/sheriff in our communities?

Well, get this.

A few years ago, the republican led legislature and then governor Branstad wrote a bill that cut 10% off property taxes for businesses. Remember that?

The schools, cities, and counties were not thrilled with this idea – because they are the recipients of property revenue and use it for existing service in their communities.

So.. then came a backfill amendment that said, ‘ok communities – we hear you. We are cutting property taxes for businesses anyway and lessening your local funds by doing so – BUT we (the state) will make up the difference in loss in your funding and backfill the money with general fund tax dollars (ish-its more complicated language but you get the idea).

Well. Guess what? The state GOP legislature and governor have over spent too much with more give-a-ways tax credits over the past few years and have run out of money.

So as they look for money, they’ve decided to renege on their promise to local governments and have proposed rescinding the backfill. Cutting the backfill money promised for schools, cities, and counties – while the businesses get to keep their property tax cuts.

Which means two things:

1.) less funding for schools, cities, and counties – which means you guessed it – less services for our communities and

2.) a strong likelihood that YOUR personal property taxes will be increased to make up the difference. This shifts the tax burden from businesses to the people and it is WRONG!

This GOP controlled legislature. This governor and her predecessor are a driving this state head-on into this train wreck. Intentionally.

When they campaign on less government – this is what that really means.

Less government = less schools

Less government = less fire/police

Less government = less maintenance / services such as sewers, roads, utilities

Less government = less public/social services

It DOES NOT MEAN less bureaucratic bullshit and corporate handouts of our tax dollars.

Don’t buy the hype!

Elections have consequences. We must vote these folks out and get this state moving in the right direction.

You can email your legislator and urge them to vote NO on SF 2081- backfill elimination bill.

One last word from your editor: Please contact your legislators. For my small towns like mine this will mean the closing of the pool, the closing of the library (which is a vital service here), less police, less upkeep of fire equipment, less city maintenance that has been hammered over the years especially cemetery care and much more I am not aware of.

Image (2) fugelsang-republicans-love-government-300x283.jpg for post 31993

Posted in Blog for Iowa, Budget, economic inequality, Economy, Iowa legislature 2018, tax cuts for the wealthy | Tagged , | Comments Off on Backfill Cut Is BS

Republican “Dirty Dozen” Bills Pending in Iowa Legislature

Action Alert from Senator Rob Hogg –

If you want to speak up about any of these bills, you can find contact information for House members, including committee membership, at www.legis.iowa.gov.

We are dealing with lots of bad bills coming from the Republican majority, and I wanted to take a few moments to let you know about “the dirty dozen” bills – a baker’s dozen – that have passed the Senate and are now pending in the Iowa House:

SF481 – Unfunded Mandate on Immigration Enforcement – This bill would force local governments to assist enforcement of federal immigration laws without funding, and is opposed by law enforcement agencies because it will inject distrust into community relationships. It passed the Senate in 2017, and was passed Tuesday by the House Public Safety Committee on an 11-10 vote and is now eligible for House floor debate.

SF2117 – Mid-Year Budget Cuts – This bill would cut the budget for the last four months of the fiscal year for our universities ($14.5 million), our community colleges ($1.8 million), skilled workforce fund ($10 million), corrections ($3.4 million), public safety ($200,000), our courts ($1.6 million), human services ($6.2 million), aging services ($220,000), public health ($925,000), agriculture and land stewardship ($377,000), and natural resources ($123,000). It has passed out of House Appropriations Committee with an amendment (H-8012) and is now eligible for House floor debate.

SF2148/HF2118 – Ban on Automatic Traffic Enforcement – This bill would ban communities from using automatic traffic enforcement, even in dangerous places where they are shown to reduce accidents and save lives. This bill is now eligible for House floor debate.

SF2169/HF2391 – Limit on Compensation for Alcohol-Related Injuries – This bill would put arbitrary limits on “dram shop” liability of $75,000 for injuries and $100,000 for loss of support for alcohol-related injuries and fatalities. This bill is now eligible for House floor debate.

SF2235/HF2394 – “Critical Infrastructure” Crimes – This bill would impose a Class B felony (up to 25 years) for people who commit an unauthorized act (like trespass) with the intent to disrupt public services, effectively punishing peaceful protest. This bill is now eligible for House floor debate.

SF2281 – Ban on Abortions – This bill would effectively ban all abortions, even in the cases of rape or incest, after six weeks of a pregnancy. This bill has been assigned to the House Human Resources Committee.

SF2282 – Supreme Court Super-Majority – This bill would prohibit Iowa courts from declaring any statute unconstitutional unless done so by a five-member super majority of the Iowa Supreme Court. This bill has been assigned to the House Judiciary Committee.

SF2305 – Worker’s Compensation Crimes – This bill would create a Class D felony for workers’ compensation claimants who assert claims without sufficient medical evidence. This bill has been assigned to the House Commerce Committee.

SF2311 – Utility Regulations – This bill would take away regulatory authority from the Iowa Utilities Board and slash energy efficiency by putting a cap on utility energy efficiency programs, raising rates for Iowans by an estimated $400 million each year. This bill has not yet been assigned to a House committee.

SF2329/HF2364 – Farm Bureau Health Plans – This bill would allow the Farm Bureau, and only the Farm Bureau, to provide unregulated health plans to “eligible” members without coverage for pre-existing conditions or other insurance consumer protections. This bill is now eligible for House floor action.

SF2341 – High-Stakes Multiple Choice Civics Test for Graduation – This bill would impose a high-stakes multiple-choice civics test for high school graduation, which if not passed would prevent students from graduating from high school. This bill has been assigned to House Education Committee.

SF2346 – Partisan Listing of Candidates – This bill would list candidates on a ballot with the top spot reserved for the candidate of the party who won the last gubernatorial election. Studies show that the top ballot spot helps a candidate, but Republicans rejected an amendment for non-partisan rotation of ballot position. This bill has been assigned to the House State Government Committee.

SF 2383 – Senate Republican Tax Bill – This bill would raise several taxes but overall cut taxes by $207 million in FY2019 and $1.2 billion, requiring deep cuts in education, health and human services including mental health, public safety, and natural resources. This bill has been assigned to House Ways and Means Committee.

Upcoming Events

Finally, I want to let you know about two upcoming events:

Cedar River Watershed Coalition Spring Meeting, Friday, March 9, 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the Wickiup Hill Outdoor Learning Center, 10260 Morris Hills Road, Toddville, Iowa 52341. For more details, and to invite your friends, visit this link: www.facebook.com/events/1948351225414523/

League of Women Voters Legislative Forum, Saturday, March 17, 10:30 to 11:30 a.m., at the Kirkwood Linn Regional Center, 1770 Boyson Road, Hiawatha, Iowa 52233. For more details, and to invite your friends, visit this link: www.facebook.com/events/1364977403606375/

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Republican “Dirty Dozen” Bills Pending in Iowa Legislature

Jim Jefferies On Guns

ICYMI, Jim Jefferies offers this hilarious, accurate take on our continuing fake national conversation about guns and the second amendment.  Must see video.

Part 2

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Jim Jefferies On Guns

Loebsack Rural Wireless Access Act Passes House

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Dave Loebsack released the following statement today after the House passed his legislation, the Rural Wireless Access Act. This bipartisan bill was incorporated into the larger Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Reauthorization Act, which passed the House unanimously, by a voice vote. Currently, the standards that define how wireless coverage is determined are not sufficient, meaning that coverage maps can be incomplete or inaccurate. Without accurate coverage maps, resources needed to improve wireless access will not be directed to the areas that need the most help, including rural areas. Loebsack’s legislation will help make sure maps are accurate so that resources to improve wireless voice and mobile Internet services go to the areas that need it the most.  Scroll down for video of Loebsack speaking on the House floor about his bill.

“Everyone at some point has been driving through places in rural America that don’t get wireless coverage. Unfortunately, the maps that the FCC uses to try fix coverage gaps are often inadequate,” said Loebsack. “We cannot invest in wireless access without first understanding the problem. That is why I am pleased my bill was passed by the House so we can improve wireless voice and mobile Internet services and ensure resources go to the areas that need it the most, including rural communities.”

A significant digital divide remains between urban and rural America. Congressman Loebsack is a leader in working to close this divide by promoting broadband deployment throughout rural America. Loebsack serves on the Communications and Technology subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over telecommunications issues. He also serves as a co-chair of the Rural Broadband Caucus.

###

Iowa needs more representation in congress by Democrats. Follow Iowa’s only Democrat in congress online.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Loebsack Rural Wireless Access Act Passes House

How Sinclair Is Using Local News To Terrorize America

These are your local Sinclair stations in Iowa –  KGAN/KFXA Cedar Rapids-Waterloo-Dubuque-Iowa City, KDSM-TV Des Moines,  KPTH Sioux City and KTVO Ottumwa-Kirksville, MO.   Find out more about Iowa and Sinclair here  here  here.

mediamatters.org/

Local news giant Sinclair Broadcast Group has been running a segment designed to gin up fear of Muslims, refugees, and immigrants. Media Matters fellow Pamela Vogel watched 200 “Terrorism Alert Desk” segments that aired on local news stations all across the country — and what she found was downright scary.

Sinclair uses deceptive tactics and misleading arguments to scare viewers. It ties ISIS into news events even if there is no connection. It fearmongers about “foreign” terrorists that lurk just around the corner. It cheers on law enforcement indiscriminately, hyping arrests even when no charges are issued. It touts anything deemed an anti-terrorist action, like walls being built around the Eiffel Tower.

But there’s one thing Sinclair’s terror segment usually avoids: Terrorism inspired by white nationalism, e.g. Charlottesville, rarely if ever appears. Instead, Sinclair’s strategy is all xenophobia all the time. And remember, this is not Fox News, whose viewers can tie the propaganda they see to the Fox News brand. Sinclair’s propaganda is hidden, instead run under the cover of the local stations it owns.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on How Sinclair Is Using Local News To Terrorize America