Can Pork Continue To Be Safe To Eat With 40% Fewer Meat Inspectors?

Published with permission from the Winter 2020 issue of The Prairie Progressive, Iowa’s oldest progressive newsletter.  The PP is  funded entirely by reader subscription,  available only in hard copy for $12/yr.  Send check to PP, Box 1945, Iowa City 52244.

Back to The Jungle Part II

by Marty Ryan

In the Fall 2019 Prairie Progressive, I wrote about the effect of increased line speeds on slaughterhouse workers. Briefly, prior to October, 2019, a pork slaughterhouse employee had a little over 18 hogs per house pass by. There was a federal rule that prevented packinghouses from running a line faster than 1106 hogs per hour. That’s about one hog every 3.2 minutes. If you don’t think that’s very much, try doing the same task every 3.5 minutes for an hour. You’ll get the picture.

Now, due to a federal regulation change called The New Swine Inspection System, the sky’s the limit. Hogs can go past an employee at the rate of… well, pigs are now going so fast it appears as though they are flying. Moreover, you can’t just squeeze another employee into that line. They’re too close to each other as it is, and they work with knives—sharp knives.

Let’s look into the consumption end of the controversial rule. You may not eat pork liver, lung, heart, or other internal organs, but a visual inspection by a trained and qualified meat inspector can lead to a decision that something might be wrong with the carcass (ham, bacon, pork chop) by closely examining the offal. When an internal organ shows a defect, foreign material, or an abnormality, the corresponding carcass is likely to have a related problem.

The new federal rule removes up to 40% of meat inspectors at a slaughterhouse. Those are good union jobs where meat inspectors check every single liver, heart, stomach, and carcass, ensuring that the pork we eat is safe and clean. The government, with a nod from the packers, believes that company employees can do those jobs, while meat inspectors focus on sanitary conditions. Does it seem as though having a loyal employee doing the work, rather than an independent government employee, results in any sort of a conflict of interest? That work includes looking for signs of enteric pathogens, defined as “gramnegative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (better known as E-coli), Salmonella, and Campylobacter jejuni,” the latter found more often in poultry.

There are three major companies in the United States that slaughter and process 57% of the nation’s hogs (compared to 32% in 1985). You’ve heard of Big Oil and Big Pharma; now there is Big Pork.

Smithfield Foods, owner of the Farmland Foods label as well as John Morrell, is owned by WH Group out of Hong Kong. It slaughters 30 million hogs per year. JBS USA (formerly Swift) is a wholly owned subsidiary of JBS, a Brazilian company that also owns Pilgrim’s Pride chicken. The third Big Pork is Tyson Foods, an American company known mostly for chicken, but slaughters hogs at its IBP locations.

All three of these companies are vertical integration food companies, meaning they own the operation from piglet to sow, and in some cases own the entire farm, the packing and processing facilities, as well as the trucking and marketing companies that transport and sell their products. Often, these Big Pork companies contract with farmers to produce pigs, selling the pigs solely to the packer. Those farrowing houses you smell in the countryside are most likely owned by the multinational companies who employ their own personnel to manage them, and pay the farmer who owns the land rent each year or month for use of the land containing the hog raising facilities and waste lagoons. A farmer may also benefit from the manure produced by these operations.

JBS, with a plant in Worthington, MN, has been the recipient of $62 million in bailout money intended to supplement farmers hurt by the trade war. JBS owners have admitted “to bribing hundreds of top officials in [Brazil] and have spent time in jail over the corruption scandal.”

National Pork Producers Council President David Herring, a pork producer from Lillington, N.C. said: “We applaud the USDA for introducing a new inspection system that incentivizes investment in new technologies while ensuring a safe supply of wholesome American pork.”

Safe? Not for slaughterhouse workers. Not for the child who eats a hot dog that was tainted with meat that got past the company employee. Not for the employee assigned to recognize an enteric pathogen and who stops the line to ensure that gram-negative bacteria, such as E-coli and Salmonella do not get into the food supply. Too many stops and that employee’s job will be like skating on thin ice.

I am going to continue to eat what little pork I have in the past. I like my bacon and my barbequed back ribs. I also like to support the union families who rely upon those packinghouse jobs. However, the next time you sit down to enjoy an Iowa Chop, be sure to say grace. It may be your last prayer.

—Marty Ryan is a former United Food & Commercial Workers business agent who blogs for Iowa Public Policy Advocates at iowappa.com

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Can Pork Continue To Be Safe To Eat With 40% Fewer Meat Inspectors?

Nuclear Power Is Not The Answer

Google Maps Image of Duane Arnold Energy Center

In 2018 NextEra Energy Resources announced plans to retire the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) — a 615-MW nuclear power plant located in Palo, Iowa — before the end of 2020.

NextEra’s main customer at DAEC, Alliant Energy, will buy out its contract in September for $110 million, sourcing electricity instead from NextEra’s wind generation fleet. The move is expected to save Alliant Energy customers $300 million over 21 years.

There are no plans to replace Duane Arnold with new nuclear generating capacity.

Two essential problems with nuclear power plants are they cost too much, and a lack answers to the question of what to do with spent nuclear fuel. These problems are political. In our current political climate that makes them unsolvable, practically speaking, even though potential solutions exist for both.

Certain environmental groups favor nuclear power to replace coal as an emissions reduction tactic. On its face this is belied by the urgency of the climate crisis.

“Nuclear, especially next-generation nuclear, has tremendous potential to be part of the solution to climate change,” climatologist James Hansen said on Dec. 3, 2015. “The dangers of fossil fuels are staring us in the face. So for us to say we won’t use all the tools (such as nuclear energy) to solve the problem is crazy.”

The challenge for nuclear energy is the timeline for market penetration in the industrial age. It will take too long.

Cesare Marchetti of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis did research which suggests the historical trend on implementation of new technologies such as wood, coal, oil and gas takes 40-50 years to go from one percent to 10 percent of market share. Nuclear energy occupies about 12 percent of current global market share. It will take almost a century for an energy source to occupy half the market. The world doesn’t have 50 years, and likely longer, to wait for nuclear energy sources to gain acceptance and growth the way coal, oil and gas have.

Even if political issues surrounding nuclear waste disposal could be resolved, the financial cost of building out a fleet of new nuclear power plants would likely follow the course of the Georgia Power Vogtle Plant expansion, which, when they broke ground, was the first nuclear power plant contemplated in 30 years. Despite proclamations of “making American nuclear cool again,” by then Energy Secretary Rick Perry, the Georgia Public Service Commission questions whether the plant will be economically viable if going on line is delayed much longer. New nuclear energy remains too expensive, especially when compared to renewables and natural gas.

Renewable energy (wind, solar, hydroelectric) is further along than nuclear in its evolution as an energy source. At 31 percent of global market share, we remain decades away from achieving 50 percent market penetration, according to Marchetti’s analysis. At the rate we are going, elimination of coal, oil and natural gas from the energy production mix for electricity won’t occur in my lifetime, and likely not the lives of the millennial cohort. By then all of this electricity talk may be rendered moot by the climate crisis.

There are no big-picture answers to the trouble of an over-heating planet in a 500-word blog post. What remains clear is our problems are driven more by politics than by technology and reason.

It is critical we root out influence and corruption in government. To do that it will take voters who care about our future and are willing to make the hard choices necessary to address the climate crisis.

In any case, from my vantage point, it seems unlikely nuclear power plants will be part of our energy future.

Posted in Climate Action, Climate Change, Nuclear Abolition | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nuclear Power Is Not The Answer

Respected Political Historian Cites Conservative Talk Radio, Fox News As The Downfall Of America’s Enlightenment Values


It’s not just us saying it. Heather Cox Richardson is a respected political historian.  Here is her bio:

Heather Cox Richardson is a political historian who uses facts and history to make observations about contemporary American politics. She is the author, most recently, of To Make Men Free: A History of the Republican Party.

Biography – I’m from rural Maine, was educated at Exeter and Harvard, and am now a professor of history at Boston College. I write books about the American past, and write articles about modern politics. The past informs my work on the present, not the other way around.

Follow her on Facebook, Twitter

Until the rise of talk radio in 1987 and the establishment of the Fox News Channel in 1996, we honored the Enlightenment values on which our government was founded: politicians had to attract voters with fact-based arguments or be voted out of office. But talk radio and FNC pushed a fictional narrative that captivated viewers who felt dispossessed after 1954, as women and people of color began to approach having an equal voice in society. That narrative—of a heroic white man under siege by a government that wants to give his hard-earned money to black and brown people and grasping women—has led us back to where we started in 1776: a conflict between democracy and authoritarianism.

Read the entire post here.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | Comments Off on Respected Political Historian Cites Conservative Talk Radio, Fox News As The Downfall Of America’s Enlightenment Values

Republican Senate Leadership Imposes New Press Restrictions For Trump Impeachment Trial


npr.org/new-restrictions

This is getting little attention in the media. Trump and the Republican controlled Senate appear to be in full cover-up mode attempting to quash the free press, one of the pillars of Democracy.

“Reporters are being confined to small cordoned-off sections in areas where unrestricted access was typically standard.

They are being prevented from walking with senators to continue conversations — even when the senator involved is willingly participating.

Reporters also now may not approach senators for interviews in the halls surrounding the Senate chamber.

Taken together, the new rules effectively prevent members of the press from reaching many senators.”

Read more here.

The Washington Post has this:

Officials have also proposed limiting video coverage of the arrival of the articles of impeachment to a single pool camera with no audio.

A magnetometer in the Senate press gallery will require reporters to trickle into the chamber one at a time. Electronic devices will be banned, leaving reporters to scuttle in and out of the room to send tweets and emails. Reporters will be placed in pens, roping them off and restricting their ability to speak freely with senators as they enter and exit.

And do not expect the normal C-SPAN coverage.

Even sedate C-SPAN is aggrieved, calling on the Senate to allow its television crews to document the trial instead of the government-controlled cameras that — as was the case during Bill Clinton’s trial 21 years ago — will limit what viewers see and hear inside the Senate chamber.  Link

The difference is 21 years ago they limited access because they were talking about sex.  Today we are talking about national security and possible criminality by a dangerously out of control president who came to power with the help of Vladimir Putin. What is the reason for limiting access now?

Ever get the feeling Moscow Mitch, Trump and the GOP have already handed the country over to Putin and they just haven’t told us yet?

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Republican Senate Leadership Imposes New Press Restrictions For Trump Impeachment Trial

MLK 2020 Iowa Events

Here is a list of MLK Day 2020 events around Iowa.  Check your local news source for additional events.  For details of each event listed here including programs, speakers, times, locations, sponsors, hosts, click on this link The Des Moines Register.


Des Moines

State Historical Building, 600 E Locust St.
Saturday, Jan. 19 from 5 to 7:30 p.m.

The Knapp Center at Drake University, 2601 Forest Ave.
Monday, Jan. 21 from 7 to 9 a.m.
Sixth annual Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer Breakfast

The Sullivan Center at Mercy College of Health Sciences, 928 6th Ave.
Monday, Jan. 21 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

Community Youth Concepts, 1446 Martin Luther King Jr. Pkwy
Monday, Jan. 21 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.

Des Moines Public Library, 1326 Forest Ave.
Monday, Jan. 21 from 4 to 5:30 p.m.
Although all Des Moines branches are closed for the federal holiday, the Forest Ave. library will open for this free and public event

First Christian Church, 2500 University Ave.
Monday, Jan. 21 from 5 to 6:30 p.m.
Dr. Yusef Salaam, one of the exonerated men known as the “Central Park Five,” will speak and answer questions about his life and the award-winning documentary “The Central Park Five” by Ken and Sarah Burns.

Perry
Perry High School
Monday, Jan. 21 from 1 to 2:30 p.m.

Ames
Ames Middle School
Monday, Jan. 21 from 6 to 7:30 p.m.

Iowa State University
Monday, Jan. 21 through Monday, Jan. 28

Boone
Ericson Public Library
Monday, Jan. 21 from 1 to 3 p.m.

Waterloo
Electric Park Ballroom
Sunday, Jan. 20 from 5 to 9 p.m.

Cedar Falls
University of Northern Iowa, Maucker Union
Monday, Jan. 21 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Ottumwa
Bridgeview Center
Monday, Jan. 21 from 7 to 10 a.m.

Iowa City
University of Iowa
Monday, Jan. 21 through Friday, Jan. 25

Coralville
Coralville Public Library|
Monday, Jan. 21 from 5 to 6 p.m.

Cedar Rapids
African American Museum of Iowa
Monday, Jan. 21 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Beyond the Baseline
Monday, Jan. 21 from 1 to 4 p.m.

Dubuque
Multicultural Family Center
Monday, Jan. 21 from 4 to 7 p.m.

Sioux City
Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ
Monday, Jan. 21 from 7 to 8:30 p.m.
The Sioux City NAACP is hosting this free event.

 

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on MLK 2020 Iowa Events

Democrats Talk About The Climate

Tuesday’s Democratic debate had a good segment on what should be one of the two overriding issues of 2020 – the other being the corruption of the president and the whole Republican Party.

It has been rare that climate change has gotten such exposure, so to see climate change front and center Tuesday was a welcome change.

The Green News Report is a weekly feature on The Brad Blog. Desi Doyen is the host of the GNR with able assistance from bradblog.com owner Brad Friedman.

In Wednesday evening’s segment of the GNR, Doyen discusses the prominence that climate issues were given by the Democrats in Des Moines.

To see climate issues finally get at least an airing is very good news. Feels like network TV and the cable newsers have been trying to bury climate issues from sight.

Here is a short clip of candidates Steyer and Buttigieg pushing each other on who is best on climate:

For those who think the climate is not changing or that climate change will not lead to the problems that have been predicted, we only need to look at Australia which continues to be the cutting edge of what is coming with climate change:

australian climate chande answers

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Climate Action, Climate Change | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Democrats Talk About The Climate

Sunday Funday: Dishwasher Edition

Would you buy a dishwasher from the guy on the end of this clip?

BTW, remember that when the Chosen One is trashing some one who dishes dirt on him as a scum bag or a lowlife, the reason that scum bag or lowlife has dirt is because at one time the Chosen One or one of his chosen companions selected that lowlife or scumbag to be part of the inner circle. We have pictures to prove it. Ask Michael Cohen or Lev Parnas. 

Someone reminded me the other day that organized crime (aka the Mafia) runs on total loyalty to their leader, their Don if you will, along with total silence about the inner workings of the Organization . If this reminds you of any certain American political Party, it is only coincidence. As Malcolm Nance always says, coincidence takes a lot of planning.

Nothing interesting happened last week.

  1. At the NCAA football championship Monday, attended by the Chosen One, teacher of the year Kelly Holstine performed what act of protest?
  1. True or false: Friday’s winter storm proved climate change is a hoax?
  1. A major potential violent rally is scheduled in Virginia’s capitol Monday as the Virginia legislature considers legislation on what issue?
  1. Rachel Maddow’s interview with Giuliani associate Lev Parnas was a bombshell this week. What other cable newsperson interviewed Parnas this week?
  1. Among the bombs dropped by Parnas was the scheme employed by the administration to oust what ambassador?
  1. Another bomb included a no-show by what US official at the Ukrainian presidents inauguration if Ukraine did not announce an investigation into Joe Biden?
  1. Republicans think they have a big scandal involving Speaker Pelosi. What horrible act did the Speaker commit as she signed the impeachment charges on the Chosen One?
  1. Robert Hyde, deeply involved in the Ukraine skullduggery, is running for Congress as a Republican in what state?
  1. Duncan Hunter – remember him – did what notable act Monday?
  1. What California congress member suddenly remembered that he had talked to a Lev Parnas after Parnas outed him as being in the inner circle of the Ukraine scandal?
  1. Among those included in the Ukraine scheme included what two top cabinet members?
  1. The Chosen One tried to shore up his support with what group of voters by rolling out what he called “the right to pray”?
  1. An extensive collection of memorabilia of what President went on an online auction Friday as one lot with bids starting at $1.7 million?
  1. Data in what section of the earth showed the highest temperatures ever with the rate of heating accelerating?
  1. A subcommittee in the Iowa senate passed the first proposal on an amendment on what issue mentioned by Gov. Reynolds in her State of the State message Tuesday?
  1. What huge investment firm is changing its investment strategy to move away from investments that are not moving to sustainability on climate change?
  1. The entire government of what country, except for the president, resigned as the president announce constitutional changes that would consolidate his power after his term ends in 2024?
  1. How many managers did Speaker Pelosi name to conduct the House’s role in the impeachment?
  1. Which state became the 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment last week?
  1. Which sport’s league and player’s union agreed to a contract that would nearly double player’s salaries and provide maternity leave?

Perhaps one of the oddest moments this week happened on Jeopardy’s Greatest of All Time contest. All time great Ken Jennings, James Holshauer and Brad Rutter were shown a picture of Congress Member Adam Schiff and none of the three could identify who it was. 

Answers:

  1. Kneeling during the national anthem
  1. Democrats say false, Republicans say true (sarcasm for the humor impaired)
  1. Gun control
  1. Anderson Cooper
  1. Ukraine ambassador Yovanovitch
  1. VP Mike Pence
  1. Pelosi used many peans to sign the papers and passed them out to the House Impeachment managers as souvenirs
  1. Connecticut
  1. Resigned from congress
  1. Devin Nunes
  1. AG Bill Barr and SoS Mike Pompeo
  1. Evangelicals
  1. JFK
  1. The oceans
  1. Abortion
  1. Black Rock
  1. Russia
  1. 7
  1. Virginia
  1. The WNBA

Perhaps one of the funniest lines from Lev Parnas last week came when Parnas was asked about Trump denying that he (Trump) did not know Parnas:

“I welcome him to say that even more,” Parnas said Thursday. “Every time he says it, I’ll show them another picture.”

trump hires the best

tip of the hat to allhatnocattle.com

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2020 election campaign, Blog for Iowa, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Dishwasher Edition

Remember In November: The Election Is A Referendum On Trump

keep trump out of jail 2020

As we head into the caucuses, try to remember that the little issues and squabbles that the media are trying to stir into a big fight are really nothing. Among the candidates still standing I have no problem with any of them except Tulsi Gabbard. I can’t believe Ms. Gabbard will be in much longer than Feb. 4th.

So when you go to your caucus Monday February 3rd, remember that your enemy is not those across the aisle supporting a rival candidate. At some point in the near future we will, we must come together behind whoever the party decides is our candidate is, no mayor who.

Nothing less than the survival of OUR country and probably our planet is at stake. If our candidate is male or female, super progressive of somewhat conservative it makes no difference. That person will be THE person that has been designated as the proverbial dragon slayer.  Once the decision is made we must unite behind the new party leader.

In some degree the election will not really be between Trump and a Democrat. The real election is actually a recall of Trump and picking a replacement. Trump’s record of four years of mismanagement, lies, lies, lies, alienating allies, immigration atrocities, fomenting violence, raping our environment, – and the list goes on seemingly forever – is up for review. I can’t imagine there are more than just a few people in this country who see this as a record of achievement.

This election will also be a referendum on the cowardly members of congress who have spent the past four years ignoring, making excuses and generally enabling the criminal actions of of an administration that came in hell bent on making a mockery of our form of government. That includes Chuck Grassley and one of the greatest enablers of all in the senate, Joni Ernst. Of course it includes Steve King who saw his form of racism come into vogue with Trump only to have it backfire on him.

The non-enablers in the Republican Party of this criminal enterprise is a much shorter list than the enablers. In fact, here is the list: Justin Amash of Michigan. All other Republican members of congress have to some degree or another aided and abetted Trump in his push to undermine our form of government. They deserve to be voted against in their own form of a rrferendum.

Thus on caucus night all the contenders have as a base line that getting rid of Donald Trump is job #1. They all also believe that climate change must finally addressed and addressed boldly. They also agree that health care for all is the ultimate goal, the question is how we get there.

One issue that doesn’t get the coverage it deserves are all the issues around elections themselves. Getting money out of politics, gerrymandering, hackable voting machines with no paper back up, voter purges that are targeted at potential Democratic voters – all problems that hurt our status as a real democracy.

So remember on caucus night, the guy across the aisle is not the enemy. The person with an (R) behind their name has been aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise in the White House. They are who we need to get out of office.

And it should go without saying. You and I will play a major role this summer and fall in making sure we drive up the votes for Democratic candidates. When we volunteer our time this fall we must get people to the polls because every vote has never meant more. Remember, every vote will never have meant more than it will this fall.

Posted in #nevertrump, #trumpresistance, 2020 election campaign, Blog for Iowa, Republican hypocrisy, Republican Obstruction, Republican Policy | Comments Off on Remember In November: The Election Is A Referendum On Trump

Iowa Policy Project On The State Of The State

Image (1) ipp-logo-w.jpg for post 8986

It is hard to squeeze out time to listen to things like the State of the State address given by the governor last Tuesday. However, when a person can’t listen it is nice to know that someone with deep knowledge of how government is supposed to run is listening and is willing to share their thoughts with us all.

When it comes to happenings in the state government, especially where finances are concerned I usually go to the Iowa Policy Project for analysis. This year I accessed IPP a little quicker than normal after hearing in one of the headlines from the speech on IPR that the Governor proposed “raising state sales tax while reducing state income tax.”

When discussing types of taxes and their effects on the various constituents of a society sales tax is generally regarded as the most regressive – that is the tax that comes down hardest on those least able to pay. In contrast income tax when structured properly can be the least regressive – that is that those who have the best ability to pay will pay the most.

On hearing that headline I decided it was time to check in with IPP and see what their opinion was. My first question was – did I hear that right? Is that what the policy proposal advanced by the Governor really was. Well, sad to say, yes it was. From the IPP analysis of the Condition of the State:    

Tax policy — an imbalanced mix of a sales-tax increase and income-tax cuts

The Governor’s tax proposals appear to follow an all too familiar formula: Raise taxes on low and moderate income Iowans in order to provide tax cuts that would benefit mostly those at the top. The sales tax, known as a “regressive” tax because it takes a much larger share of the incomes of the poor than of the rich, would rise by 17 percent — boosting the state sales tax from 6 cents to 7 cents on the dollar, raising about $540 million. This would finance further income tax cuts, including a large cut in the top rate, benefiting upper income Iowans disproportionately. An already regressive tax system would become even more regressive. It should be noted that the Governor’s proposals come on top of 2018 tax cuts that — when passed — were shown to benefit the wealthiest the most. 

The Governor is following the discredited idea that tax cuts lead to prosperity. The failed experiment with drastic tax cutting in Kansas should have put an end to such wishful thinking {my bolding – ed.}. Piling more tax cuts on top of the massive cuts already in place will force reductions in the kinds of investments in education, infrastructure, health, and work supports that are actually the drivers of economic prosperity.

Well, there it is, the Republican wet dream – the state version of trickle down that never trickles down and eventually breaks the economy by putting too much money in too few hands rather than having it circulating and creating decent paying jobs.

 Will the Republican-led legislature follow the Governor’s lead? To answer such questions I pull out my brand spanking new Magic 8 Ball and give it a shake. “All signs point to ‘YES’” it says. 

Iowa Policy Project executive director Mike Owen gave this synopsis of the Governor’s speech:

“The Governor’s proposal was long on tax-cut rhetoric, short on substance to achieve clean water and educational goals, and desperately lacking in the theme of investment that she attempted to promote. Iowa will never cut its way to prosperity, but the Governor persists in this contradiction of reality,” said Mike Owen, executive director of the nonpartisan Iowa Policy Project in Iowa City. 

“She did offer a hopeful nod to an issue critical to the prosperity of Iowans — child care assistance — but left more to imagination than to a defined vision.”

No one can see the future, but the past is always prologue. The prologues indicate another good year for the rich in Iowa, another bad year for the poor, elderly and sick and more promises on education left wanting.

Posted in Blog for Iowa, economic inequality, Economy, Iowa Policy Project, Republican Policy, tax cuts for the wealthy | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Join Women’s March 2020 In Red Oak, Dubuque, Iowa City

#Womenrising2020

2020 is set to be a landmark year for the Women’s March. We are writing our fourth year into existence and you play the biggest role. In 2020 we are engaging in targeted direct action aimed at those who have attempted to impede on our rights and we are building with those who have always stood by our side. Women have seen serious attacks under our current administration but we have also seen just what we are capable of when we fight together. In 2020 we need you to rise with us. In 2020 we need you to march with us.

Women’s March Iowa City 2020
Saturday, January 18, 2020 • 10:00 AM
Downtown Pedestrian Mall
210 S. Dubuque Street
Iowa City, IA 52240

SW Iowa Women’s March Red Oak
Sunday, March 08, 2020 • 2:00 PM
Legion Park
1904 N Broadway
Red Oak, IA 51566  (Joni Ernst’s home town)

4 th Annual Women’s March Dubuque
Saturday, January 18, 2020 • 10:30 AM
Steeple Square 101 E 15th St
Dubuque, IA 52001

Women March Iowa – 4th Annual Anniversary 2020 @ Online Forum
January 25 @ 10:00 am – 1:00 pm

The Women’s March intersectional feminist policy agenda is the first of its kind. Read the full agenda and join us in taking action in the halls of power.

Women’s March agenda is 71 pages. Here’s page 1:

Building upon the Unity Principles established in 2017, Women’s March expanded the process to include dozens of additional organizations representing women in marginalized communities, who have collaborated in committees to identify one to two urgent policy priorities under each of the following areas:

•Ending Violence Against Women & Femmes
•Ending State Violence•Reproductive Rights & Justice
•Racial Justice
•LGBTQIA+ Rights
•Immigrant Rights
•Economic Justice & Worker’s Rights
•Civil Rights & Liberties
•Disability Rights
•Environmental Justice

The policies identified under each area are specific, tangible, and able to be acted upon and supported in 2019 and 2020, potentially even passed with the support of activists nationwide. In addition, Women’s March calls for three policy priorities that intersect with all committees and affect the rights of all women:

•Universal Health Care / Medicare for All
•Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution
•Ending War

The Women’s Agenda is a tangible declaration of how we will protect and defend our rights, safety, health and communities. Our Agenda will serve as a work plan to Congress and will create the roadmap we will use to mobilize our constituents into 2020 and beyond.

This document was published on January 19, 2019.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Join Women’s March 2020 In Red Oak, Dubuque, Iowa City