Medicaid MCOs Get Another Huge Raise

Image (2) MedicaidPrivatization-300x169.jpg for post 34454

Coming on the tail of an 8.4% raise to the MCOs last year, the administration of Governor Kim Reynolds awarded the MCOs a raise of 8.6% this year. In real dollars those numbers that is a raise of $344 million in 2018 and $386 million in 2019. In total that $730 million in RAISES in the past two years.  

The Medicaid program is not bringing in any more money. From my understanding Medicaid in Iowa is about a $5 billion a year proposition, so that $730 million in the last two years is coming from the program itself. That means that the patients in the medicaid program have taken approximately a 20% cut in funds that should be going to care.

From day one Iowa’s privatized medicaid program has been accused of huge cuts in service to patients, denials of service and long delays in paying provider bills. Taking another nearly $400 million from the patients this year is not going to make it any better. 

Unfortunately the people who are directly affected by the Medicaid shenanigans (taking public moneys and syphoning it to private companies) are often the people with the least voice in society. Thus their complaints are often ignored and go unreported.

I am not sure of this figure, but somewhere in my memory I seem to remember that the state was able to run the Medicaid program for about 2% or $100 million of the $5 billion fund. Just the last two raises equal about 8 times that figure and the MCOs (Managed Care Organizations) claim they are losing money on that. Sounds like they must have a real problem handling money to begin with.

According to Senate Democratic Leader Janet Pederson:  

“The outrageous contracts with two out-of-state corporations are more evidence that privatized Medicaid in Iowa is unsustainable, unaffordable and unpredictable,” said Senate Democratic Leader Janet Petersen.

Petersen said Governor Kim Reynolds and Republican lawmakers can’t back up their claims that privatizing Medicaid management would save the state money. She said the state-managed system costs grew an average of 5 percent each year in the 10 years before privatization.

A great timeline of Iowa’s involvement with the MCOs can be found here at the Iowa Public radio website.

As an aside as if things weren’t bad enough already for Medicaid in Iowa, remember that Republicans have a court case now before a three judge panel in the US 5th district to rule the ACA unconstitutional. Medicaid is directly tied to the ACA, so a ruling that the ACA is unconstitutional will no doubt greatly affect Medicaid in Iowa. 

Posted in #trumpresistance, Affordable Care Act, Republican Policy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Medicaid MCOs Get Another Huge Raise

Sunday Funday: Loose Screws Edition

Warning – Not safe for work due to language. George Carlin on finding himself: (4 minutes)

From CNN:  

A container of screws that fell off a vehicle and littered the roadway in Jackson County, Mississippi, caused flat tires along nearly 30 miles of interstate.

Mississippi Highway Patrol responded Tuesday after getting numerous calls about stranded motorists near the Pascagoula River Bridge. When officers arrived, they discovered sheet metal screws scattered across Interstate 10 West. In total, 36 passenger cars and three semis each had multiple flat tires.

“Wrecker response time was upwards to three hours for [motorists] waiting on tow trucks due to the number of calls for service,” the Mississippi Highway Patrol said in a statement.

Speaking of loose screws, guess who is still in charge.

  1. In one of the strangest press conferences ever, what cabinet officer defended his handling of the case of Jeffery Epstein?
  1. The USWNT won the World Cup. What country’s team did they beat in the finals?
  1. The USWNT’s coach, Jill Ellis, became the first coach to achieve what record in women’s soccer?
  1. 50 years ago this coming Saturday – July 20, 1969 – the world practically stood still as what event took place?
  1. Iowa’s second congressional district contest drew what big name Republican candidate last week?
  1. In a seeming capitulation, Dear Leader abandoned his quest to get what question on the census questionnaire?
  1. Following a rough week, what cabinet member resigned post Friday morning?
  1. Happy Birthday to what folk singer/ social activist who’ve us so many songs including “This Land Is Your Land”?
  1. As Dear Leader was giving a speech praising himself for his climate achievements, what was the weather in Washington, DC?
  1. Virginia governor Ralph Northam convened a special legislative session to deal with what issue that was highlighted by an event in Virginia Beach on May 31st?
  1. The cost of running Medicaid in Iowa went up by how much based on the new contract the state awarded to the MCOs?
  1. What once major news source for black Americans published its last print edition last Wednesday?
  1. Today is also the birthday of what only person who became president without ever being elected president or vice-president?
  1. New Orleans is reeling from the effects of what hurricane that hit this weekend?
  1. What person who ran an off-again, on-again campaign for president in 1992 died last week?
  1. One in, one out. What Democrat dropped out of the presidential race, while what other jumped in?
  1. In Oklahoma a man who was stopped for expired tags on his vehicle was found to have what dangerous substance in the car?
  1. The Seth Rich murder conspiracy story was revealed to be a total lie planted by what group and spread by Fox News?
  1. Senate candidate Amy McGrath raised $2.5 million in her quest to unseat what powerful Republican senator?
  1. US exports to what country dropped 31% in June from last June?

John Fugelsang on twitter

Remember, Evangelicals – Trump has expressed more public sympathy for Labor Secretary Alex Acosta – who illegally gave Epstein a slap on the wrist – than he has for Epstein’s rape victims.

Trump’s also criticized his own accusers’ looks more than he’s criticized Epstein’s rapes.

Answers:

  1. Labor secretary Alex Acosta
  1. The Netherlands
  1. Winning back-to-back World Cups
  1. The moon landing
  1. Former congressman from Illinois, Bobby Schilling
  1. The citizenship question
  1. Former labor secretary Alex Acosta
  1. Woody Guthrie
  1. DC got a month of rain in an hour while Dear Leader was praising himself.
  1. Guns. Republicans quickly blew the system up and adjourned.
  1. 8.6% or $386 million
  1. The Chicago Defender
  1. Gerald Ford
  1. Barry
  1. H. Ross Perot
  1. Swalwell dropped out, billionaire Tom Steyer jumped in
  1. Radioactive uranium along with a rattlesnake
  1. Russian Intelligence
  1. Mitch McConnell
  1. China – and just the other day Dear Leader said China was buying more……

Andy Borowitz: 

Following the resignation of its Ambassador to the United States, Kim Darroch, the government of the United Kingdom has disclosed that it has been unable to find a replacement for Darroch who does not also think that Donald J. Trump is a blithering idiot.

At a press conference at 10 Downing Street, the British Prime Minister, Theresa May, revealed that the search for a new ambassador who does not believe that Trump is an imbecile has thus far come up empty.

“We did not want a repeat of the unfortunate Kim Darroch incident, so we made the first question on the job application, ‘Do you think Donald Trump is a moron?’ ” May said. “So far, none of the applicants has checked the ‘no’ box.”

Posted in #trumpresistance, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Loose Screws Edition

Rule Of Law? Pish!

While the video below isn’t directly related to the subject, it does have the flavor (3 minutes)

Republicans are great with little bumper sticker slogans. A few words that seemingly mean something almost as a guide for their actions. Sort of today’s version of “wise old sayings.” Someone makes up such a saying, it gets slapped on a bumper sticker and is then repeated ad infinitum by Republican candidates who have absolutely no intention to live by these words.

“Rule of Law” is one such phrase. This is a phrase that we have been exposed to for who knows how long. Hs it been since Reagan? Or was it something created to imply that President Clinton was a law ignorer?

Whatever caused the birth of this phrase, Republicans have ridden it hard while ignoring it themselves for the most part. The implication of the phrase is that those mouthing this phrase – frequently – are those who live by it. These are the people that follow the rule of law. Evidence comes down hard that the Republican Party uses this phrase only as a prop.

We see people like Chuck Grassley ignoring the dictates of the constitution on the appointment of judges. We see congress members like Duncan Hunter literally thumbing their noses at campaign laws to dip into the cash for a high life style.   

What Republicans mean by their little phrase is that they will throw the book at marginalized groups. If a person has enough money Republicans can be quite accommodating as we have seen throughout this administration.

It is almost as if this week Republicans want to illustrate just how they really view “rule of law.” The stories coming from south Florida and the Miami Herald about how the “rule of law” was bent to favor a very rich Jeffrey Epstein are overwhelming. Yet as overwhelming as the Epstein revelations have been, we also have the current president ready to defy a decision by the Supreme Court.

As most know, when the Supreme Court ended their session at the end of June, one of their very last decisions concerned whether a citizenship question should be included on the 2020 census. In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court ruled that NO such a question should be on the census form.

The administration has refused to accept that ruling and appears poised to begin printing the forms with the question included. So we have a constitutional crisis – the executive branch thought the president plans to defy the judicial branch and its decision that the citizenship question on the census is not legal.

Once again the current president has moved this country into unknown territory by refusing to follow the law. Will the executive branch defy the Court and print the census questionnaires with the illegal question? If so, how could the judiciary possibly stop it? Could the Court stop the distribution? The president will be pushing for this to come to an impasse believing that the judicial branch will back down. (ed. note: The current president has withdrawn his threat to ignore this ruling for the present time.)

Whereas on one hand the current administration has chosen to defy Court orders, on the other hand the administration has chosen to use the judicial system to accomplish one of their wet dream goals of the past 10 years. That is ending the ACA. 

After failing to end the ACA through the normal means – legislatively – Republicans have teen to the path of trying to end it through a court decision. A three judge appellate court in the 5th circuit (Texas area) is now hearing the case that turns on whether the mandate for having insurance is still valid due to changes in tax laws passed by Republicans in December 2017 and signed into law.

A group of Republican governors and state attorney generals are behind this suit. The panel chosen to hear the case appears to be hand-picked to destroy the ACA. Should this happen the Republicans will be using the judiciary to do what they couldn’t do. Very possibly the question will end up before the Supreme Court again. This time there will be different players on the Court.

We could go into a long discussion of the ACA and SCOTUS, but the point is that the party of the “Rule of Law” is really the party that is determined to do whatever it damn well pleases no matter what. This makes the constitution not worth the paper it is written on.

Prior to the current administration we had leaders who would restrain themselves from stepping into the realm of the other two branches. Stepping over the invisible boundaries would break down the unwritten barriers that have kept our constitution as the supreme law and kept the concept of checks and balances from keeping one branch take over.

The current president could care less about boundaries and barriers and he especially doesn’t’t care about checks and balances. He cares about power and accumulating power into his office. The current president is slowly leading the country toward destroying the very foundations of our democracy.

“Rule of Law?” Isn’t that for little people?

Posted in #trumpresistance, Affordable Care Act, Charles Grassley | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Rule Of Law? Pish!

Corporate America Invented Christian America

Historian Kevin Kruse explains how Corporate America created what we call “Christian America.” (26 minutes):

So many of us want to know how our current alignments got to be the way they are. Some are somewhat easily explainable even if they are not logical. For instance business’ alignment with the Republican Party. While Republicans are well known as the party of cutting taxes, that policy also leads to much higher costs for businesses and almost inevitably lead to recessions and depressions which often wipe businesses out.

One alignment that has always tickled my curiosity is the alignment between christians and the Republican Party.  I could never understand what ever got these two entities together. Surely they are held together these days by anti-abortion stances and hate for gays especially and other groups of people in general. 

However, the Republican Party has never been exactly an organization that modeled Christian principles. Honestly, it has never been a secret that money gets a lot more love than Christ does in their circles.

So what was it that got these two seemingly disparate entities together into what seems to be a marriage made to conquer earth? It always helps to know where you have been to figure out where you are at.

The setting is the 1930s. America is reeling from a Great Depression that many feel was caused by bad monetary policies of successive Republican administrations and business excesses. Onto the scene steps President Franklin D. Roosevelt with his programs to attack the grinding poverty. 

Historian Kevin Kruse explains how even he was surprised to find that the roots of Christian America begins in corporate America’s reaction to FDR’s New Deal and the implicit challenge that government would be supplanting business. Note that the rise of Labor union power was one of the major drivers for corporate America to challenge FDR.

Kruse then goes into many of the events and people who then helped shape the “Christian” America over the next two decades that culminates in the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower and the change of the national motto to “In God We Trust” from “From many, one.” (E pluribus unum). Note also that Corporate America chose to exploit America’s trust in ministers.

This was a real eye opener for me. Another question I had always had was at what point did Catholics go from outsiders to part of the club. Kruse enlightens us on this also. Hint: it had nothing to do with President Kennedy.

I hope you enjoy this video and I hope it answers some questions about the unholy alliance between the Republican Party and Christians in America.

Kruse’s story ends with some reference to Nixon driving the Republican Party apart from the Christians. This then brings up the question of what reunited this alliance after Nixon poisoned it to some degree. To answer that question We turn to the Samantha Bee videos that I have posted here several times. It is the videos that explains how the Republican Party latched on to the abortion issue not as a matter of principle, but as a way to exploit the Christian vote. This also folded well into Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” that exploited race issues:

Posted in Corporate Greed, Republican hypocrisy | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Corporate America Invented Christian America

Ernst Ignores Moms Against the Camps

Ernst makes 'em squeal.jpg

From dailykos.com by Gabe Ortiz:

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst initially refused to speak with more than 50 concerned Iowa mothers who converged on her Des Moines office this week to call on her to do something about the Trump administration’s inhumane treatment of migrant children in border facilities and prison camps across the U.S.

Ernst at first tossed the Moms Against the Camps activists to Corey Becker, an immigration policy staffer that activists found out once worked for noted white supremacist Rep. Steve King. When activists asked Becker “how Ernst’s immigration policy differs from Steve King,” Working Families advocate Shawn Sebastian tweeted, “he refused to answer because he felt it was ‘inappropriate.’”

Finally, “after 6.5 hours and about 100 Iowa moms passing through with their children,” Sebastian continued, Ernst agreed to a phone call the next day. It lasted just 20 minutes, with Ernst defending ICE terrorism against immigrant communities (“we need to keep Americans safe”) and taking the brave stance of opposing child abuse but asking them for “specific examples,” as if it hasn’t been all over the news recently. When they asked if Ernst could meet with them after reviewing conditions for herself, Sebastian said, she refused and hung up.

All the advocates wanted was for Ernst to put herself in the shoes of parents at the border for just one second, and some “carried signs that said, ‘What if it were Libby?’ referencing to Ernst’s daughter. ‘We need to ask her as a mother, would be she happy if her child was locked in a cage?’” said advocate Bonnie Brown.

Much much more at the link including twitter pics and the running story of the day.

The thing that stood out to me was that Ernst got upset and hung up on her constituents because “they are unwilling to listen.” Uh, Senator, your job is to listen to those you represent!

 

@shawnsebastian

Jul 10

More

After 20 min @joniernst says”I am going to go because you are clearly unwilling to listen …” the #momsagainstthecamps ask if she will follow up with us after she visits the detention camps. Ernst refuses her own constituents and hangs up.

 

@shawnsebastian

Follow @shawnsebastian

More

.@joniernst pushes back against holding ICE accountable shifting blame to the moms and children at the border, “We are a nation of laws.”

Draw your own conclusions on Ernst’s comment on “nation of laws.”

Joni Ernst simply refuses to represent Iowa and Iowans. She is representing the Koch brothers and the NRA. Iowans need to replace her. 

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Comments Off on Ernst Ignores Moms Against the Camps

The Most Important Freedom Is The Freedom Of Expression

Photo Credit – Simon Gibbs via Wikimedia Commons

The Most Important Freedom is the Freedom of Expression
By Ralph Scharnau

Freedom of expression or speech is the most fundamental right in the United States. It means citizens have the right to freely express themselves and their opinions.

Although our history is replete with examples where it was not always protected and defended, polls indicate that Americans consider this freedom more important than religious freedom and due process rights.

Freedom of expression, after all, captures how we view ourselves individually and as a nation. The utterance is commonplace in everyday conversations among Americans. It provides the historical foundation of our two most revered documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

The history of the republic presents us with a story about expanding freedom of expression to include more and more people. Amendments to the Constitution constitute the primary way this was accomplished. The first ten Amendments (Bill of Rights) guarantee civil liberties. Subsequent Amendments ended slavery, defined citizenship, and extended the franchise to blacks, women, and 18-year-olds.

Women, racial and ethnic minorities, workers, and others have struggled to deepen and transform the definition of freedom of expression. Over several generations, some real strides have been made in reducing disparities based on race and sex. Women and minorities have secured greater access in the areas of employment, politics, education and athletics. In 1998, an amendment to the Iowa constitution brought equal legal rights to women.

On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court made same-sex marriage legal nationwide. No longer can states deny gay men and lesbian women the same marriage rights as opposite-sex couples. In 2009, Iowa became only the third state in the union to give same-sex couples the right to marry in a unanimous ruling of the state’s Supreme Court.

Belief in freedom of expression as an inherent right of all people has coexisted with persistent efforts to limit this freedom by race, gender, class, and in other ways. Limiting it can be traced to slaves, immigrants, the poor, and others. The meaning of freedom of expression has been constructed at various levels, in congressional debates, in political essays, on picket lines, and even in bedrooms.

The promise of our nation’s freedom of expression for all leaves no one out. All individuals should have the right to pursue their dreams, regardless of who they are, who they love, or where they live.

When Republicans control the legislative and judicial branches, we get government that services the rich and takes from everyone else. Whether it’s health care policies, protecting the environment, supporting workers, advocating for minorities, or promoting safety, profits and wealth “trump” all other concerns.

Presidents and the press have clashed since the birth of the republic. But no president in living memory has conducted such an incendiary, dogged, and slanderous attack on the news media comparable to Trump.

Trump has also spewed his venom on other communities who voiced opposition to his administration, undermining the constitutional freedom of speech and press enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution. While vilifying his critics (MSNBC), Trump applauds and offers special access to those praising his administration (Fox and Friends).

Today the idea of freedom of expression continues to circumscribe our culture and politics. The term remains vigorously contested. The debates will continue and new definitions will emerge.

Liberals insist that freedom should be shared by all, not just the rich and powerful. This is an ongoing struggle to secure the right of everyone to equal opportunity, regardless of skin color, sexual identity, and economic status.

Ralph Scharnau

Posted in Progressive Community, progressive values | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Most Important Freedom Is The Freedom Of Expression

Support For Rita Hart

Rita Hart

I first heard Rita Hart, candidate for U.S. Congress in Iowa’s second district, speak on Friday, June 26, 2015, at Gil’s Restaurant, Ballroom and Limousine Service in Clinton at the Clinton County Democrats Hall of Fame Dinner. I have no recollection of what she said as the number of speakers was large, and my memory not as good as it used to be.

I’m supporting Hart for Congress for three reasons: she is a two-term former state senator, as our lieutenant governor candidate in 2018 she helped organize the second district for Democrats, and she has an education and farming background. I already sent a small donation.

Of the two announced Democratic candidates, I know the other better, Newman Abuissa of Iowa City. I like Abuissa a lot, and am aware of his contributions to Iowa Democratic politics and the peace and justice movement. However, this is his first campaign for elected office and we need an experienced campaigner to keep this seat Democratic. Hart has a D behind her name, won her two races for state senator, and has the bona fides of a campaigner to support it. That’s enough for this open race, one of many important ones in the 2020 general election.

What about policy, one might ask. I didn’t agree with every vote Dave Loebsack made during his tenure, and don’t expect I will like every vote Rita Hart makes. I no longer seek a perfect candidate and Dave Loebsack’s endorsement of Hart is what I needed to hear before putting a check mark next to her name on the primary ballot.

View Rita Hart’s Announcement video here.

View Rita Hart’s TED Talk titled Re-envisioning Education – Seeing Schools Differently here.

Donate to Rita Hart’s campaign here.

Follow Rita Hart on Facebook and Twitter.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Support For Rita Hart

Support For Newman Abuissa

Newman Abuissa. Photo Credit – University of Iowa Center for Human Rights

Editor’s Note: Newman Abuissa formally announced his candidacy to represent Iowa’s second district in the U.S. Congress at an event in Iowa City on Sunday, June 30. While Rita Hart is favored to win almost a year from the primary election, Abuissa is well known for his work with the Democratic Party and in the peace and justice community. Ed Flaherty, a long-time contributor to Blog for Iowa and a co-founder of the Iowa Chapters of Veterans for Peace supports Abuissa.

Support Abuissa for Congress
By Ed Flaherty

I support Newman Abuissa’s candidacy for the U.S. House of Representatives in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District. Newman was born in Syria, came to the U.S. as a young man, and has been an engineer with the Iowa Department of Transportation for 30 years.

He is a leader in his church, the Iowa City community, and the Iowa Democratic Party.

His candidacy is unique in several ways, all of which will help make him a strong member of the U.S. Congress. As an immigrant, he has a broader view of the world than most.

While he is very thankful for his home and U.S. citizenship, he is particularly disappointed in our country’s failures to live up to its potential. Friends and relatives of his remain in Syria, and his daily worries and thoughts about them help inform his passion.

Newman is unique in that he connects the dots between our huge military budget and the neglect of peaceful priorities. He sees that our endless wars create an awful reputation for the U.S. abroad.

He sees that green economic development here in Eastern Iowa is impeded by our tendency to equate strength with military might.

Please give Newman Abuissa your close consideration.

~ This post first appeared as a letter to the editor of the Iowa City Press Citizen

Posted in Guest Posts, politics, Progressive Community, progressive values | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

We’ve Got To Do Something

U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.

Over the weekend Erin Murphy, a Lee Enterprises Des Moines-based reporter, said it was quiet in Iowa’s congressional primary races.

“Perhaps in the coming weeks and months, some of these quieter primary races will become more crowded,” Murphy wrote in the Quad City Times. “For now, though, the fairly low level of interest from candidates has been surprising.”

Murphy recounted the five 2020 congressional delegation races, noted who was in each race, and which were conspicuous by the absence of a declared candidate from one party or the other (a Democrat in Iowa 4 and a Republican in Iowa 2*). It is a long time until the June 2020 primary election, so Murphy’s surprise seems premature, even if he acknowledged the 11 months in the article.

My sense, from talking to Democratic voters, is there is near universal belief “we have to do something.” By that, they mean overturn Republican control of the presidency, keep the U.S. House and retake the U.S. Senate, and win one or both chambers of the state legislature. People are dead serious about it and seem willing to devote resources to making it happen. They will be sure to show up to vote in the general election.

The disconnect, and maybe the premise for Murphy’s article, is between the “we have to do something” feeling and nominees produced by the party. Voters I talk to don’t care that much about who is nominated for Congress and U.S. Senate unless they are an incumbent. They just know what we have now isn’t working.

I know what that’s like. We had to do something toward the end of George W. Bush’s first term. My response was to pick a race, focus, donate money, and volunteer every chance I got. I felt long-time Congressman Jim Leach had to go. While the Democratic challenger Dave Franker wasn’t the best candidate, everyone who volunteered on his campaign worked hard toward his election. “It didn’t work out well,” I mentioned to Dave Loebsack via email when he established an exploratory committee for the Second District Congressional seat in March 2005.

I put 2004 behind me and re-started my effort to ouster the incumbent. Voters I spoke with on the telephone and in person had turned against the once popular Leach. It almost didn’t matter our candidate was Dave Loebsack, because the expressed need for change was so prevalent. We went into election night not knowing if we’d win but hopeful based on the large number of voters who’d had it with the incumbent. As we now know, Loebsack was successful in defeating him.

I haven’t started door knocking or calling voters in 2019. As I mentioned, “we have to do something,” and that’s similar to 2006 which was the beginning of a Democratic wave that culminated in a national trifecta in 2008.

Why is it so quiet in the congressional races in July? I’m not sure that’s an accurate statement. Maybe there are less candidates running, however, the noise, if there is any, is more among rank and file Democrats, particularly those who are normally less active, taking it all in and discussing politics with friends and family. They need space to consider candidates in lives that don’t normally revolve around partisan politics. Outside the presidential preference at the February caucus, most don’t really care who nominees are as long as there is a D behind their name and candidates act like it. People are making room for politics in busy lives, but it hasn’t the high priority that will drive a more exciting race of the kind Murphy was expecting.

Resolved not to let Trump and the Republican policies stand, people seem hunkered down trying to make a go of it in an economy that favors the wealthy and where corporations strive to squeeze regular people out of every last dime. Maintaining the type of resolve needed to change our government takes energy, just a different kind than what’s represented in an active, multi-candidate primary.

People say an open primary and debate between multiple candidates is good for the party. I don’t know about that. Rank and file view it differently and people seem to take stock before declaring candidacy, realizing the financial investment in one of these five races will be significant. Maybe what you see is what you get and others don’t want to run of office.

July 2019 may be the quiet before a political storm that’s brewing next year.

* On July 8, Erin Murphy reported that Bobby Schilling filed paperwork with the Federal Elections Commission to run for Congress in Iowa’s second district as a Republican.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on We’ve Got To Do Something

$750 Billion, Who Cares?

Ed Flaherty

$750 Billion, Who Cares?
By Ed Flaherty

In another wonderful example of bipartisan cooperation, the U.S. Senate on June 27 passed the National Defense Authorization Act by a vote of 86-8.  The headlines of all media, conservative and liberal, should be screaming.  This bill authorizes a 2020 military budget of $750 billion.  (Compare that to $618 billion in 2017).  Military spending will be $33 Billion more that in FY 2019.  If every man, woman, and child in the U.S. were to pay for the $750 billion military expenditures, it would be $2,278 per capita.  Of course, if war spending were to be financed that way, the voices of protest would be loud.  But, we don’t finance war that way.  We simply add it to our national debt.

There are so many dimensions to this insanity that it is hard to begin.  Some simple comparisons might be helpful.  The 2020 budget for the Center for Disease Control is $6.6 billion.  The 2020 budget for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency is $5.54 billion.  The 2020 budget for the Environmental Protection Agency is $6.08 billion.  The total of those three agencies’ budgets is $18.22 billion.  The INCREASE in the military budget is 1.8 times those three agencies’ total budgets.

A big increase in the budget for mental health may be what is most needed now.

~ Ed Flaherty, a former banker, now works for peace.

Posted in Progressive Community | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on $750 Billion, Who Cares?