War On Americans

gun deaths vs. terror deaths

With the Iowa caucuses approaching you can go to any Republican event and hear one of the mass of Republican candidates harp over and over on the theme of terrorism and the presidential “duty” to “keep America safe.”

Yet what they won’t tell you is that Americans are most at danger not from their comic book grasp of terrorists thousands of miles away but are more in danger from the guy next door who owns an arsenal and has an ax to grind. Often the perceived threat is some slight that has grown in their mind as a fire fanned by the flames of hate radio and television “news” cable channels, that use hate and fear to attract eyeballs for their sponsors.

The deaths for Americans in all our wars is about 1.5 million. The most costly war in terms of lives lost was our Civil War where just short of 650,000 died. Gun deaths in the United States average between 30,000 and 35,000 per year. That means that since 1990 Americans have killed more Americans than were killed in our Civil War. Since the dawning of the Peace movements of the 1960s we have killed enough others to surpass all our casualties in all of our wars. We are at war with ourselves.

As in all wars there are those who see the horrors of war as a great time to make money. Who can forget the specter of VP Cheney making millions on a war he helped start? We have a similar specter as gun merchants will see their sales and profits rise in the shadow of yet another high profile mass murder. We will also once more see the National Rifle Association profit as they protect the gun industry and fan the flames of fear to drive sales. These are the darkest angels of our democracy.

Every day lives are shattered in this country. People going about their normal day are shot and killed or maimed for life. These victims are left to fend for themselves often with only some form of public assistance for income as they can no longer work. Family’s lives are shattered beyond description and bills mount up for victims. We seldom hear of these consequences from our mostly worthless media. We hear of the deaths, we hear of the motives of the shooter and their background, but we never hear of the shattered lives left in the aftermath.

Once more we will hear the gun defenders telling us not to politicize this issue at this time. Do we politicize voting rights when a state passes a truly horrible bill disenfranchising minorities? Damn right we do. Did President Bush use 9/11 to politicized a vendetta against Iraq? Damn right he did. Now is the very best time to talk about guns in this country. We talk about issues when the issue is hot. Currently, Republicans continue to try to defund Planned Parenthood in the wake of the fake documentary videos and the lies blasted by Carly Fiorina at the Republican debate.

Daily we have Republicans fan the fear of terrorism in this country. Deaths from terrorism are practically nonexistent in this country. You can see that in the chart above. But the chances of your parents, your brothers or sisters, your child or some other loved one or friend being shot down going about their daily business or attending school are much greater. Imagine the lives of a family left with with burying a child and trying to put their lives back together. I think of it daily. That is true terror.

One of my criteria in choosing a presidential candidate will be not their stance on the current definition of terror, but what they will do restore America to a place where we can work, shop, play, attend school without the fear of some person with a gun out to settle a perceived wrong. In short I expect the next president and congress to secure the domestic peace.

While our focus is once more on the worst of gun tragedies, statistically there were 90 other gun deaths in America Thursday. No doubt several involved young children, no doubt some involved family discord. But no doubt all left shattered family and friends behind to pick up the pieces.

Posted in firearms, gun control | Tagged | Comments Off on War On Americans

It Takes More Than A President

Bernie Sanders at the 2014 Johnson County Democrats BBQ

Bernie Sanders at the 2014 Johnson County Democrats BBQ

It’s hard to disagree with Bernie Sanders (I-VT): a political revolution is needed to make sustained, progressive change in the U.S. political system.

It takes more than a president.

“No president, not the best intentioned in the world can implement the changes we need in this country without a political revolution,” Sanders said at the University of Chicago on Sept. 28. “I am talking about the need to transform the political system.”

Unless Sanders can inspire more Americans to participate in the political process, any top-down plan for revolution is set to fail. He knows this.

“There is nothing that I am telling you today that is pie in the sky, that is Utopian. Nothing,” Sanders said. “We can accomplish all of that and more, but we will not accomplish that if 80 percent of young people do not vote. We will not accomplish that if 63 percent of the American people do not vote.”

Let’s say Sanders overtakes Hillary Clinton’s double-digit lead for the Democratic nomination for president. There is time for him to do that, and key Clinton endorsers acknowledge privately it is possible.

Much of the Democratic establishment in Iowa, including former senator Tom Harkin, has endorsed Clinton. Journeyman blogger Pat Rynard details some of them here. If Clinton secures the endorsement of Democratic politicos and Sanders wins the Iowa caucuses, what then?

What we know, or should, is once the nomination is finalized the party needs a kumbaya moment to elect the nominee. Mine is a history of picking losers when I have caucused in Iowa. Ted Kennedy, George McGovern, John Kerry (won caucus, lost presidential election), and John Edwards. I’m well familiar with having to settle for someone who was not my first choice.

Some, like aficionado of the sport of kings Jerry Crawford, will pivot or lose what credibility they have left. The rest will go along with mixed levels of enthusiasm. That’s not the core issue.

Without legislative support any president’s agenda is reduced to a small number of victories combined with executive actions. The power of the presidency is not insignificant, however, implementing the proposals evident in almost every Sanders speech will prove impossible if the Congress continues to be dominated by money, corruption and the influence of corporations. To be effective, the new president will need congressional support in the form of an Iowa congressional delegation consisting of more than Dave Loebsack (IA-02).

We each have some take-away from Pope Francis’ visit to the United States last week. Mine was his pointing to the bas-relief portrait of Moses by Jean de Marco hanging in the House chamber. It may take a Moses figure to lead us out of the political quagmire where we find ourselves in exile from the democracy created by the founders.

“You are asked to protect, by means of the law, the image and likeness fashioned by God on every human face,” Pope Francis said on role of Congress. We are a long way from that, and both Sanders and Clinton know it.

My bet is on Clinton winning the nomination, but a focus solely on the presidential horse race misses Sanders’ point. Winning the general election is by no means a slam dunk for Democrats. Key to Democratic success in 2016 is organizing now to bring more people into the process. This is where the use of corporate money, control of the media, and emphasis on religion is serving Republicans.

While voter registration matters to the party, its importance is eroded by the clear expression of more than a third of the electorate that “No Party” is better than any party. The focus on the Iowa caucuses and the presidential pick is a distraction from what we need to do to accomplish Sanders’ revolution.

There are no easy answers to Sanders’ call for a revolution. As long as Democrats focus on the horse race, revolutions will remain a part of history — something to distract us from today’s problems, the ones many avoid confronting.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Progressive Community | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on It Takes More Than A President

It’s Not The Quality Of Coverage, It’s The Quantity

Pull Over - We Have Questions

Pull Over – We Have Questions

We’ve been saying this all along.

poynter.org

With Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, the media giveth and the media taketh away.

That’s the basic argument outlined in The Washington Post by political scientist John Sides, who attributed Trump’s recent decline in the polls to a sudden dropoff in media coverage.

After Trump announced his candidacy earlier this year, Sides noted that he rode a media blitz to a zenith of polling popularity near the end of the summer. But that wave of publicity has since crested, more or less correlating with waning poll numbers:

Sides dismisses the notion, raised earlier this month by Politico’s Jack Shafer, that Trump has been adversely affected by negative coverage. All in all, Sides says, coverage of Trump hasn’t been so unfavorable as to jeopardize his standing with potential voters. And the polls seem to reflect a disregard for the tenor of the coverage in general.

During this time period, the tone of coverage appears to matter much less than the volume. Statistical models that try to account for the potential inter-relationships between media coverage and polls show that the volume of Trump’s coverage is helping to drive his poll numbers, and vice versa.

(click here to read the entire article)

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign | Tagged , | Comments Off on It’s Not The Quality Of Coverage, It’s The Quantity

RFK, Jr. Calls Koch Brothers “Deadly Parasites” On Democracy

koch brothers own americaEver wonder why you rarely see Robert Kennedy, Jr. on the TV?  Possibly because he is the most knowledgeable and articulate spokesman for the environment there is, and he is unafraid to tell the truth about corporate greed. Prepare to be blown away when you read this.

ringoffireradio.com/

Excerpts from an article that originally appeared on EcoWatch.

by Stefanie Spear

At this year’s Waterkeeper Alliance conference in Boulder, Colorado, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. delivered a provocative unscripted keynote that lambasted the carbon lobby for undermining democracy and subverting the common right to a healthy environment.

Speaking to a group of activists, including more than 200 Waterkeepers from 30 nations, Kennedy declared, “We are engaged, as Abraham Lincoln said, ‘in a great Civil War.’” This time, he said, “the conflict involves all the Earth’s peoples. It’s not just a battle to protect our waterways, our livelihoods, our property and our backyards. It’s a struggle for our sovereignty, our values, our health and our lives. It’s a battle for dignified humane and wholesome communities. It’s a defensive war against toxic and economic aggression by Big Oil and King Coal. It’s a struggle to break free of the ‘soft colonialism’ of carbon’s corporate tyranny and create an economic and energy system that is fair, rooted in justice, economic independence and freedom.”

“Polluters,” he explained, “assault soft targets first—and that means the poor.” He recounted how the majority of toxic industrial sites and noxious facilities are in lower income communities where residents lack political power or connections to protect themselves. He gave examples of these environmental injustices including, Emelle, Alabama, which is home to the largest toxic waste dump in America—one of the country’s most impoverished regions where one-third of the residents live below the poverty line and more than 65 percent of the residents are black—Chicago’s south side, which has more toxic waste sites than any other American community and East Los Angeles, a primarily black and Hispanic community, which is the most contaminated zip code in America.

“In these communities,” he said, “Not just the land and water, but the people have been commoditized—and everything becomes expendable in the drive for corporate profits.”

But he added, “It’s not just the poor who are under assault. The corporate hunger for profit is threatening all people with loss of their natural world and the other assets of their patrimony.”

Kennedy said that corporate efforts to privatize the commons are occurring in all parts of the world and that “environmental injury correlates almost perfectly with political tyranny.”

“In China, Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, environmental destruction went hand in hand with political despotism and corruption,” he continued. “Thanks to the Pinochet regime, the forests and waters of Chile are no longer owned by the Chilean people. Every single river in Chile is now owned by a Spanish company, Endessa which plans to dam all of them for private profit. So the people of that nation no longer own their rivers, they don’t own their forests. Even the highways, railroads, utilities, airports, stadiums and prisons—all the public spaces that once formed our civic lives are being occupied by private and corporate wealth.”

To give context to the history, Kennedy talked about the many environmental insults in the 1960’s that spurred the modern-day environmental movement, including the 1963 extinction of the Eastern Peregrine Falcon from DDT poisoning, the burning of the Cuyahoga River, the Santa Barbara oil spill and the declaration that Lake Erie was dead, which all occurred in 1969. The Santa Barbara spill held the record for the largest oil spill until Exxon Valdez and the BP Deepwater Horizon. In those three examples, polluters had effectively privatized a major American river, one of the Great Lakes and all the beaches in Southern California.

In response to such insults, in 1970, 20 million Americans, 10 percent of our population, came out on the streets for the first Earth Day in “a democratic reassertion of popular sovereignty over the common’s, those crowds demanded that our political leaders return to the American people the ancient environmental rights that had been stolen from our citizens since the Industrial Revolution,” Kennedy said.

In response to this massive public outpouring, Republicans and Democrats working together passed, over the next 10 years, 28 major environmental statutes, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, RCRA, TSCA, FIFRA, The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act and Superfund. All of these statutes were intended to restore our rights to the public commons. What happened next? “These new prohibitions against corporate pollution hurt the industry’s bottom line. So the polluters fought back,” he declared.

Throughout the next three decades, polluters funded politicians including Presidents George Bush and Ronald Reagan, their appointed judges and various Republican Congresses chipped away at the new environmental laws. But then, according to Kennedy, the industry achieved its most brazen and stunning victory. Kennedy said, “In the year of the millennium, the most corporate friendly Supreme Court since 1933 stopped the 2000 election vote count in Florida and stole the presidency from Senator Al Gore, the greenest presidential candidate in our history. That decision turned the White House over to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, two Texas oilmen.”

Even as they dismantled America’s environmental laws by statute, Bush and Cheney stocked the regulatory agencies with industry lackeys and profiteering cronies who weakened and auctioned off America’s public lands and forests to the campaign contributors at fire sale prices, according to Kennedy.

But George W. Bush wasn’t done. He next appointed two ultra-corporatist U.S. Supreme Court Justices—John G. Roberts in 2005 and Samuel Alito in 2006. Kennedy said that it is wrong to think of these judges as traditional conservatives. “They are not. They are corporatists. If you analyze their decisions, there is no coherent conservative political philosophy. They have taken the ‘conserve’ out of conservatism. The only predictable outcome of their rulings is that ‘the corporation always wins.’”

The apogee of their unctuous worship of unsheathed corporate power was the Supreme Court’s 2010 5 to 4 decision in favor of Citizens United, which, as Kennedy proclaimed, “turned American democracy over to large corporations.”

The so called “Citizens United” decision is the “most sweeping expansion of corporate power this century. In an acrimonious split decision, the five ‘conservative’ justices declared that, in the eyes of the Constitution, corporations were people and money is speech,” continued Kennedy.

“And today it’s hard to argue that we still have a democracy in this country when you have the Koch brothers, the two richest people in America, who have pledged already to put nearly $900 million into this presidential election, which is comparable to the amount spent by either political party,” said Kennedy. “This year’s presidential election is going to cost $10 billion with half of that coming from 100 wealthy families. Nearly $1 billion is coming from two brothers.”

And, said Kennedy, “You will hear no criticism from the press, the supposed guardians of our democracy. And that’s because most of that money will go to media advertising—the 4th estate has been bought off.”

“Whether we recognize it or not, we are all locked in a life and death struggle with these corporations over control of our landscapes and political sovereignty,” Kennedy said. “If a foreign nation did to our country what the coal and oil barons do every day, we would consider it an act of war! They poison our rivers and aquifers, steal our fish, flood our cities and trample our democracy. They are pilfering our values, robbing our culture, impoverishing our lives, sickening our children and stupefying our minds with pollution. They subvert our heritage by privatizing our patrimony. They are turning America into a colonial economy.

“Under the colonial model multinational corporations exploit weak political systems to commoditize and privatize a nation’s resources. A robust democracy would never allow a foreign company to plunder the nation’s natural resources, poison her landscapes and subjugate her people. So colonialism requires the multinationals to weaken and capture the indigenous political system of the target nation. They do so by making alliances with local oligarchs with military and intelligence apparatus and conservative religious organizations and buying off the media. All these indigenous elites get a share of the profits in exchange for allowing the theft of their country’s resources. Pollution is not just theft—it is treason. The Koch brothers are not just America’s biggest polluters—they are thieves and they are traitors to our country and their crimes against America and humanity have made them the richest men on Earth.

Corporations are a useful economic tool. However, “corporations should not be running our government because they don’t want the same thing for America as Americans want,” he continued. “They don’t want democracy. They want profits. They want no competition. They are corrupting our democracy. They are stealing everything that we care about in this country.

“I believe in a true free market where you can’t make yourself rich without making your neighbors rich and without enriching your community, where we properly value our national resources and where we reward efficiency. But polluters make themselves rich by making everybody else poor. They raise standards of living for themselves while lowering quality of life for everybody else. They undervalue natural resources or take them for free. And they do it all by escaping the discipline of the free market. Polluters externalize their costs to artificially lower the price of their product. The 28 environmental laws that we passed after the first Earth Day in 1970 were intended to restore true free market capitalism by forcing actors in the marketplace to pay the true cost to bring their product to market. There is a huge difference between true free market capitalism—which makes a nation more efficient, more prosperous and more democratic—and the kind of corporate crony capitalism which we have today.”

After 45-minutes of some of the most powerful comments about the reality of the world today, Kennedy finished by telling the crowd, “But we are not going quietly. We’ve heard the summons to the barricades and we are filling the streets. We are the soldiers in a revolution against carbon. And this is an industry that no longer has a justifiable economic model.”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.Pointing at the roaring crowd, he said, “Every single person here is willing to die with their boots on. That commitment is what brought you the Waterkeeper movement. We are going to keep fighting for these landscapes, for these rights, for these rivers and for all the values that we care for as a people and as a society.”

(click here to read the entire article)

Posted in Climate Action, Environment, Ring of Fire Radio, water | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Chiropractic Explodes into the 21st Century

…and it all started in Iowa!

by Linda Thieman, Sioux City

Dr. Juan Munoz, DC-small w nameThe founding of chiropractic as a healing art has almost taken on the proportions of legend or myth. According to Daniel David Palmer, the late founder of chiropractic, this combination of art and science originated in 1895. Palmer had encountered a janitor who had been deaf for 17 years, claiming that the deafness had started when something in his back popped out. Already a proponent of natural healing and the science connected with it, Palmer explained his theory of spinal alignment to the janitor and was allowed to do an adjustment. The man’s hearing was immediately restored and chiropractic was born. Two years later, the Palmer School of Chiropractic was founded, and Palmer’s son, Dr. B.J. Palmer, developed it into the prestigious college that is it today.

As chiropractic took off and became popular with Americans who experienced its healing effects, the American Medical Association and Big Pharma saw the growth of this non-surgical, non-pharmaceutical treatment as a threat and started a smear campaign, according to New York Times best-selling author Dr. Joseph Mercola, DO.

In fact, the anti-chiropractic smear campaign was much more severe than the AMA “merely” setting out to destroy the reputation of the chiropractic profession by calling them “quacks” and any number of other derogatory terms. In 1976, finally completely fed up with the deliberate maligning of his life’s work in chiropractic, Dr. Chester Wilk, DC, and four other licensed chiropractors filed suit against the AMA and several other medical organizations and later won their case. During arguments, the AMA et al. had been shown to manipulate insurers so that they would not pay for chiropractic treatment, disparage chiropractic colleges, prevent the government from learning about the effectiveness of chiropractic care, hide evidence of that same effectiveness, and take part in additional activities that would allow the AMA to maintain its health-care monopoly.

Enter Dr. Jay Holder, DC. Not long after the 7th United States Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Wilk’s ruling in favor of chiropractic in 1987, Dr. Holder, a Miami Beach-based chiropractor, enlisted the aid of researcher and biostatistician, Dr. Robert Duncan, PhD, at the University of Miami Medical School. Dr. Duncan helped set up a scientific study on the effectiveness of chiropractic in terms of a patient’s overall sense of well-being, and in particular, how it would affect those dealing with addiction. But before such a study could be implemented, it would be necessary for the premise to be in a format that could be measured and reproduced. In other words, how would one account for the difference in level of pressure or technique used by chiropractors of varying sizes and strength?

Dr. Holder came up with a solution. Over a period of years, Holder both created and patented a toggle recoil instrument, called the Integrator™, and the Torque Release Technique™, which combines the best of traditional chiropractic with quantum physics. The emphasis is not linear, as in traditional chiropractic, meaning that using force to adjust the entire spine at once is abandoned in order to adjust just the primary subluxation, or misalignment. This then allows the body to adjust secondary and tertiary subluxations itself, which tends to be a much more gentle process. As Holder himself says, this substantial difference makes the TRT™ “the first technique of chiropractic’s second century.”

Because of the effectiveness of the Torque Release Technique™, the high-tech diagnostics used and the number of scientific studies backing these claims of efficacy, the TRT™ has taken the chiropractic world by storm. The Holder Research Institute in Miami Beach offers two-day trainings with a half-day refresher course to practicing chiropractors. Today, there are close to 30,000 licensed chiropractors working in the United States alone, with 5-6,000 of them officially trained in the Torque Release Technique™. What’s more, in the last few years, the TRT™ has been offered as part of the curriculum at chiropractic colleges around the country, which is one of the main reasons that the use of the TRT™ has exploded onto the American health care scene.

One of these enthusiastic, young chiropractors who is successfully using the TRT™ is Dr. Juan Muñoz, DC, of Inside-Out Family Chiropractic in Sioux City, Iowa (pictured above). Dr. Muñoz was instrumental in actually bringing the TRT to the Palmer College of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa, when he was a student there, and finds that due to the nature of the TRT™, his practice is thriving. After just five months in business, Dr. Muñoz is looking to expand his office with another chiropractor and possibly another location.

The reason, he says, that he and the members of his chiropractic practice are so excited about this innovative chiropractic technique is that “it is getting better results in a shorter amount of time with longer lasting effects. The hardest thing about being a chiropractor is finding the area that is causing all the issues. With TRT™, you always know that you are adjusting the [root] cause of people’s health concerns.”

Dr. Juan Muñoz will be speaking at Palmer College of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa, this week, at 1000 Brady Street. October 2, 2015, 7pm-9pm, and October 3, 8am-10am. The general public is welcome.

Linda Thieman is co-founder of Blog for Iowa and the original editor.

Posted in Health Care & Medicare | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Steve King Challenger Calls King A “Fox News Celebrity”

weaver flagGotta love a girl who’s out there slamming Faux News and Steve King.  She said, “instead of a Fox News celebrity, we need a representative in Washington.”  Gee, ya think?

Watch her video, then visit her website weaverforcongress.com and contribute if you can.

 

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Steve King | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Steve King Challenger Calls King A “Fox News Celebrity”

If Any Republican Wins In 2016

There is no difference between Republicans and Republicans.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign | Tagged , | Comments Off on If Any Republican Wins In 2016

Grassley, Ernst Vote To Defund Planned Parenthood Again

Planned_Parenthood_Fan_Page_Profile_Photo

In case you missed the vote taken Thursday, the senate failed to pass the short term spending bill that would keep the government open past Oct. 1st. A key provision of that spending bill was defunding Planned Parenthood. Thus a yes vote for the bill would at the same time be a vote to defund PP. This would be a major blow to the health care of women, especially poor women, in this country.

As expected, Iowa’s Republican senators both voted to defund PP.

With an election campaign coming up next fall it seems rather arrogant of Grassley to tell half of the voters of Iowa that he doesn’t support one of Iowa’s mainstay healthcare institutions for women’s health. However, most can remember Grassley’s “standing in the schoolhouse door” approach to the PPACA and his “pull the plug on Grandma” moment as part of his attempt to stop that bill.

Grassley stands for the wealthy. He has opposed any attempt to make health care more accessible for everyone throughout his career.

Grassley is so out of touch with Iowa. Next year will be a good time for him to be retired.

Rob Hogg, Tom Fiegen or Bob Krause will be happy to help him retire.

Posted in Charles Grassley, Joni Ernst, planned parenthood | Comments Off on Grassley, Ernst Vote To Defund Planned Parenthood Again

Why we must listen to Pope Francis‏

Pope Addresses Congress

Pope Addresses Congress

The following is an email sent from the Bernie Sanders campaign:

“If politics must truly be at the service of the human person, it follows that it cannot be a slave to the economy and finance. Politics is, instead, an expression of our compelling need to live as one, in order to build as one the greatest common good: that of a community which sacrifices particular interests in order to share, in justice and peace, its goods, its interests, its social life. I do not underestimate the difficulty that this involves, but I encourage you in this effort.” – Pope Francis addressing Congress today. (Thursday Sept. 24th)

Brothers and Sisters: I am not a theologian, an expert on the Bible, or a Catholic. I am just a U.S. senator from the small state of Vermont.

But I am emailing you today to discuss Pope Francis in the hope that we can examine the very profound lessons that he is teaching people all over this world and some of the issues for which he is advocating.

Now, there are issues on which the pope and I disagree — like choice and marriage equality — but from the moment he was elected, Pope Francis immediately let it be known that he would be a different kind of pope, a different kind of religious leader. He forces us to address some of the major issues facing humanity: war, income and wealth inequality, poverty, unemployment, greed, the death penalty and other issues that too many prefer to ignore.

He is reaching out not just to the Catholic Church. He’s reaching out to people all over the world with an incredibly strong message of social justice talking about the grotesque levels of wealth and income inequality.

Pope Francis is looking in the eyes of the wealthiest people around the world who make billions of dollars, and he is saying we cannot continue to ignore the needs of the poor, the needs of the sick, the dispossessed, the elderly people who are living alone, the young people who can’t find jobs. He is saying that the accumulation of money, that the worship of money, is not what life should be about. We cannot turn our backs on our fellow human beings.

He is asking us to create a new society where the economy works for all, and not just the wealthy and the powerful. He is asking us to be the kind of people whose happiness and well-being comes from serving others and being part of a human community, not spending our lives accumulating more and more wealth and power while oppressing others. He is saying that as a planet and as a people we have got to do better.

That’s why I was so pleased that in his address to Congress today, Pope Francis spoke of Dorothy Day, who was a tireless advocate for the impoverished and working people in America. I think it was extraordinary that he cited her as one of the most important people in recent American history.

As the founder of the Catholic Worker newspaper, Dorothy Day organized workers to stand up against the wealthy and powerful. Pope Francis said of her today in Congress:

In these times when social concerns are so important, I cannot fail to mention the Servant of God Dorothy Day, who founded the Catholic Worker Movement. Her social activism, her passion for justice and for the cause of the oppressed, were inspired by the Gospel, her faith, and the example of the saints.

How much progress has been made in this area in so many parts of the world! How much has been done in these first years of the third millennium to raise people out of extreme poverty! I know that you share my conviction that much more still needs to be done, and that in times of crisis and economic hardship a spirit of global solidarity must not be lost. At the same time I would encourage you to keep in mind all those people around us who are trapped in a cycle of poverty. They too need to be given hope. The fight against poverty and hunger must be fought constantly and on many fronts, especially in its causes. I know that many Americans today, as in the past, are working to deal with this problem.

The fact that the pope singled out Dorothy Day — a fierce advocate in the fight for economic justice — as one of the leaders he admires most is quite remarkable. We are living in a nation which worships the acquisition of money and great wealth, but turns its back on those in need. We are admiring people with billions of dollars, while we ignore people who sleep out on the streets. That must end.

Dorothy Day fought this fight, and as Pope Francis says, we must continue it. We need to move toward an economy which works for all, and not just the few.

We have so much poverty in a land of plenty. Together, we can work to make our country more fair for everybody.

I am glad that you are with me in this fight.

In solidarity,

Bernie Sanders

Dorothy Day

Dorothy Day

Posted in Bernie Sanders, Economy, food, Food Insecurity, Immigration, Income inequality, poverty | Tagged , | Comments Off on Why we must listen to Pope Francis‏

Sunday Funday: Boehner To Resign Edition

I'll have some time to do that puzzle now

I’ll have some time to do that puzzle now

When it comes to blockbusters dropping from nowhere, few things can top the announcement that Speaker of the House John Boehner would resign from the House in a month.

We had just finished a breakfast where my wife said of a Boehner story “I wish he’d just quit!” This was hardly the first time she said that. We then went to watch about a half hour of the Stephanie Miller show on Free Speech TV. About 15 minutes into our watching some woman called in to say the NY Times said Boehner was quitting. We were stunned and disbelieving. Just to show where I do put my trust these days, I went to the internet (we must keep the internet open, folks) to verify. Dailykos, democraticunderground, talkinpointsmemo – yep they all had the story and it looked to be true. A medium earthquake in the political landscape.

There will now be as much speculation on the why as there will be on what comes next. No idea why he quit, but I truly hope the Republicans will look for a moderate voice to replace Boehner. Those are few and far between in the Republican House these days, unfortunately.

Well, lots of other stuff did happen last week. Were you paying attention?

1) Pope Francis began his 10 day trip with a stop at what other Western hemisphere nation before coming to the US?

2) Martin Winterkorn resigned his job under fire this week. What job did he hold?

3) News of Boehner’s resignation brought a standing ovation at what meeting of religious conservatives in DC Friday?

4) Here is a memory from a September some 63 years back. VP candidate Richard Nixon took to the airwaves to defend himself. During the speech he invoked the name of what cocker spaniel puppy?

5) Martin Shrkeli saw his name become a curse word to the American public for doing what?

6) Approximately how many VW cars worldwide will be affected by the emissions scandal?

7) 55 years ago yesterday, Americans young and old were glued to their TVs and radios to watch or listen to what?

8) Earlier this week another Republican quitting was big news until Boehner resigned. Who quit and what did he quit Monday?

9) A major decision by the Interior Department this week said that what species does not need federal endangered species protection in the western US?

10) In some other major environmental news, what country announced it will use a cap and trade system to slow down their pollution?

11) What Iowa state senator announced he will make a run for Senator Grassley’s seat next fall?

12) Hillary Clinton announced at a forum in Des Moines that she opposes the construction of what controversial project?

13) Warring sides in what South American country announced they would have a pact within 6 months ending a 50 year conflict?

14) The nominee for Secretary of the Army is stirring controversy because he is what?

15) Finally a CEO is going to jail. Stewart Parnell was sentenced to 28 years in prison after his company knowingly sold what salmonella tainted product?

16) Sing it out! A judge in Los Angeles ruled that the 80 year old copyright on what ubiquitous song was illegal?

17) What Republican presidential hopeful rode reaction to the “debate” last week to a current #2 rank among the hopefuls?

18) Ignoring that clause in the constitution about religious tests for public office, which republican hopeful declared Muslims were not fit for the presidency?

19) The Pope eschewed a limo to travel in, instead opting for a what?

20) Following the Pope into DC was a leader with about the same number of people in his sphere at @ 1.25 billion people?

You may notice that there was no question on the passing of one of America’s favorite baseball players and a champion of the unexpected quote. May you rest in peace, Yogi. Son of an immigrant and all American through and through, Berra seemed like a guy down the street who just happened to play America’s favorite game very well. In Yogi’s own words, folks – It ain’t over til it’s over.

Answers:

1) Cuba

2) CEO of Volkswagen – he resigned amid the emissions scandal

3) Values Voters Summit 2015

4) Checkers – a puppy given to his daughters by a Texas backer.

5) raising the price of an AIDS drug by 5000% overnight.

6) 11 million

7) the first Kennedy – Nixon debate in 1960

8) Scott Walker quit his presidential bid.

9) the greater sage grouse

10) China

11) Rob Hogg

13) Colombia

14) Eric Fanning is openly gay

15) peanut butter

16) Happy Birthday

17) Carly Fiorina. Her lies about Planned Parenthood seems to play some followers in the GOP

18) Ben Carson

19) a Fiat

20) Xi Jinping, head of the Communist Party in China.

Here is hoping for a little less drama next week.

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Boehner To Resign Edition