ALEC Convention Ends; As Usual No Reports

Rest assured that most of us are screwed.

A Legislator for Every Corp.

A Legislator for Every Corp.

ALEC ended what should be by any measure an illegal gathering of businesses and state legislators in Washington DC Friday. Even though this is a meeting where legislators are conducting business of the states, there are no outsiders allowed in. No reports of what transpires is allowed. There is a better chance of light escaping a black hole than information escaping ALEC meetings.

From what has resulted from past meetings we can take an educated guess what it may mean for an Iowa where there is no way to stop Iowa Republicans control of all branches of government. The insane tax breaks for business, the handing over of taxpayer money to private businesses for questionable reasons, the gutting of our public education system and of course the disempowering of unions will be big on the agenda. All these are ALEC’s wish list items.

Not to say everything will be bad. Most likely we will get the ability to shoot our neighbors for no good reason. Or be shot by a neighbor with a gun and an attitude.

Oh, and some of us will lose our vote based on our heritage. Expect some attempt to take the vote away from college students in the cities where they go to school.

If you want to see what Iowa will look like in a couple of years just look at the mess called Kansas to our south and west. Just google “Kansas failed government” and there are a slew of hits. One from last May from Mother Jones magazine tells of government budgets wrecked, jobs fleeing the state and schools way underfunded. This will be Iowa if ALEC and legislative leaders get their way.

Now we find out that ALEC is not only creating legislation for government bodies below the federal level, thanks to Jim Hightower and inthesetimes.com that ALEC is also working diligently to have a constitutional convention called. The purpose of this convention will be to install the vision of the Koch Brothers as the basic laws of the United States.

From inthesetimes:

A balanced budget amendment has long been a holy grail for the Right since the 1930s. In the 1980s, conservatives made a push for a balanced budget constitutional convention and, 20 years later, the idea was resurrected as part of the Tea Party platform. That’s when BBATF was formed (ed. note Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force) to carry the movement forward. With 16 resolutions held over from the previous wave of conservative activism, BBATF has since passed resolutions in Alabama (2011), New Hampshire (2012), Ohio (2013), Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Michigan, Louisiana (2014), South Dakota, North Dakota, Utah (2015) and West Virginia (2016), bringing the total to 28. This year, BBATF is targeting 13 states: Arizona, Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. In six of these states Republicans control both legislative bodies and the governorship, making passage a real possibility and leaving BBATF one state shy of the magic 34.

A balanced budget amendment would greatly tie the federal government’s hands in times of crisis, especially depressions and recessions.

From Jim Hightower:

Last January, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott revealed that he has penned NINE new amendments to the US Constitution. Abbott is proposing a Bill of Sale, effectively transferring our national government from The People to The Plutocrats. His “tweaks” would outlaw government actions that restrain corporate abuse of workers and consumers, while also preventing future Congresses from meeting crucial public needs such as health care, voter rights, and restoration of our national infrastructure.

However, Abbott is not the force behind this tampering with our Constitution. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) – at the direction of the Koch brothers and their corporate cohorts wrote Abboty’s Bill of Sale. Back in 2010, ALEC’s board of directors approved a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention to enact Abbott’s corporate humbuggery Abbott is now pushing.

Convening a convention, permitted under Article V of the Constitution, is a dream of those seeking an American Kochistan, and ALEC is spearheading a hodgepodge of right-wing groups that are close to succeeding. At the convention, they would attempt to rewrite our nation’s fundamental governing document. The changes would enthrone the “moneyed corporations” that Jefferson and other founders abhorred as destroyers of America’s democratic possibilities.

We actually believe that our government works in at least a shimmer of light. Now we find out that behind the scenes a private lobbying group (ALEC) has been working for years with legislators to bring about very fundamental change in our government without hearing anything about it.

If that doesn’t frighten you I don’t know what will.

Posted in ALEC, Iowa legislature 2017, Koch Brothers, money out of politics, Republicn Policy, union busting, voter suppression | Tagged | Comments Off on ALEC Convention Ends; As Usual No Reports

Sunday Funday: Post-Truth Edition

post-truth

Looks like the words of the year from the big dictionary companies (Oxford English, Merriam-Webster and Dictionary.com) will be post-truth for the OED, fascism for Merriam-Webster and xenophobia for Dictionary.com. Not sure about you, but I see a trend here based on a certain event of the past year. Fascism, a bad idea with easy answers is back! Fascism will be helped in its course by post-truth, xenophobia and old favorites racism, misogyny, and good old fashioned lies and propaganda. Look for it at a White House near you!

A small observation I think will sadly be true soon: Barack Obama will be hailed as a great or near-great president sandwiched between the two worst presidents ever.

Were you paying attention? It is hard to right now.

1) Monday morning the first scheduled flight between what two countries in a half a century took place?

2) The Reason Foundation dropped Iowa’s highway system ranking from 18th last year to what lowly position this year?

3) In Pella, Iowa 3 people were killed when what what happened at the Pella Walmart?

4) An elector from Texas resigned rather than voting for what presidential candidate?

5) A man who was recorded delivering a rant against Clinton voters was banned from future flights by what airline?

6) Irony – what state represented in congress by climate deniers is suffering through huge fires aided by extreme drought?

7) Jim Delligatti died last week. His claim to fame was the creation of what fast food staple sandwich in the late 1960s?

8) Once again gun violence raised its ugly head at a college campus last week. Which one this time?

9) Breitbart called for a boycott of what company after the company pulled all advertising from the website?

10) In San Diego an extremely close House race was called Monday for whom?

11) Nancy Pelosi won the minority leadership position in the House again. Who did she defeat?

12) Despite claims from the next administration, what company still moved over a thousand jobs to Mexico?

13) The Southern Poverty Law Center has recorded nearly how many bias related hate crimes in less than a month since the election?

14) OPEC made an announcement last week concerning what?

15) Among Secretary of State candidates, which one would have to get permission from his probation officer to travel to the office?

16) The neighbors in Mike Pence’s temporary housing area are doing what to make the new Veep feel welcome?

17) Talk about a traveler! What American hero was med-evacced from the South Pole last week because of illness?

18) Drunken drivers in Kensington, PEI, Canada will have to listen to recordings of what band on their way to the hoosegow?

19) Elaine Chou is in the cabinet once more. She is married to what prominent republican politician?

20) The House voted along party lines to double the budget of the special committee investigating what health care provider?

Christmas will be tough this year as we look for what is coming.

Answers:

1) Cuba – republicans may change that quickly

2) 40th

3) a pickup truck drove through the door

4) Trump of course

5) Delta

6) Tennessee

7) the big mac – go ahead sing the jingle

8) Ohio State

9) Kellogg’s

10) Darrel Issa

11) Tim Ryan of Ohio

12) Carrier

13) 900 and climbing

14) they will be cutting production in January

15) David Petraeus. Remember he gave state secrets to his mistress but was only tried as a misdemeanor.

16) Flying the rainbow flags of the LGBT community

17) Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, America’s second man on the moon.

18) Nickelback, eh?

19) Mitch McConnell

20) Planned Parenthood. Maybe if PP would give out free Viagra, congress would leave them alone.

The sun now is setting at the earliest time of day for ten days. We are nearing the solstice.

Posted in Humor | 1 Comment

Another Open Letter To Bobby “Suck It Up Buttercup” Kaufmann

kurt-frieseJohnson County supervisor-elect Kurt Friese had this to say following Bobby Kaufmann’s recently announced plan to introduce a bill to punish universities he calls the “Suck It Up Buttercup” bill. Re-posted here with permission.   Original post at kurtfriese.com

###

Dear Representative Kauffman,

You and I have only met in passing once or twice, so I will not presume to know your motives in putting forth what you termed your “Suck it up, buttercup” legislation, which press reports say you plan to introduce when the legislature returns in January. What I can tell you, though, is that the proposal is intellectually, logically, and compassionately void.

Suggesting that you, or any third party (especially in government), should have the authority to decide what is or is not a legitimate fear, worthy of receiving compassionate counseling or friendly support, demonstrates a disturbing lack of empathy. I do not know if you have had personal or family experience with trauma, but one defining characteristic of it is that the person experiencing it knows it to be very real, and when a person who is not experiencing it attempts to delegitimize the fear, well, that is simply being cruel.

We both come from positions of considerable privilege, you and I. If I were to submit in public discourse that I knew what it felt like to be a woman in America, or an immigrant, or a minority of some type, I would be roundly castigated and then laughed out of the room. Your contention that such people should simply “suck it up” demonstrates privileged contempt for people who are different from you. So does referring to them with the pejorative “buttercup,” as if feeling fear means a person is weak or frail.

I was fascinated to read, in a transcript of your interview with the CBC radio show “As it Happens,” that you began the interview by stating, “I believe the national conversation needs to take place with both sides coming to the table.” Speaking as a person who has spent a lifetime gathering people around tables, I can state with expert authority that calling people names like “crybaby,” or denying them help that they desperately feel they need, is not an effective way of asking them to sit at your table. It makes people uncomfortable – perhaps in the same way you felt uncomfortable in that interview, which would explain why you hung up on your host.

You also made it a point to address the protestors who briefly blocked traffic on I-80. You and I can agree that doing so was dangerous, and the local authorities were right to break it up right away. It appears, however, that your main objection was their message, not their means. Do you honestly believe, sir, that if the election had gone the other way, a different variety of protestors would not be doing precisely the same types of activities across the country as we have seen in the past two weeks? They certainly promised that they would. Can you say with a straight face that you would not have accepted those protests as legitimate?

There are a few weeks between now and the beginning of the new legislative session. I am writing today to ask you to take these weeks – gathered around what I hope is a bountiful holiday table full of wonderful food and surrounded by friends and family – take these weeks and ponder in the spirit of those holidays what it means to let your decisions be guided by love and understanding.

Sincerely,

Kurt M. Friese, Iowa City
Johnson County Supervisor-Elect

bobby-kaufmann-buttercup-bill

Posted in #nevertrump | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Another Open Letter To Bobby “Suck It Up Buttercup” Kaufmann

The ACA, Medicare And Morality

hat tip to medicareresources.org

hat tip to medicareresources.org

Paul Ryan has made little secret of the fact that he is gunning for the three big Democratic achievements that keep many people alive in this country.

The biggest and perhaps easiest target is the Affordable Care Act. Since it has been around only a short time – about 5 years since implementation – and Republicans have used their dominance of the media to attack the ACA 24 hours a day, 365 days a year with an extra day of attack this year. They have greased the skids to make people believe that the ACA is a product of satan’s mind and dying is preferable to getting anything that reeks of “gummint help.”

Remember that in Kentucky last year voters elected a governor who said he would abolish the Kynect Medicaid program immediately and leave hundreds of thousands without healthcare. As we recently learned telling people that they will be without healthcare if you elect So-andSo does little to stop them from voting against their own interests.

But now that Republicans control all branches of the federal government for the first time since 1929 (what was so special about 1929?) they are in the driver’s seat to reverse any advancements that society has made since then. Specifically they have the programs that have helped save countless senior lives in the past 8 decades – Social Security and Medicare.

However, both programs have huge pots of money associated with them. Huge pots. Trillions of dollars. So Republicans and more specifically the wealthy owners of the party want that money. They just have to come up with a scheme they can sell the voters that seems legitimate while they (Republican Party owners) take huge chunks of our hard worked for tax dollars and transfer it to themselves. They won’t end the programs, they will be redesigned so that they get the money and we get the shaft.

Republicans often use a kind of sick morality to sell their products. In a situation like Medicare they somehow seem to think it immoral that we band together in an organization called “government” to make rules that will benefit most of the members of our society. Thus banded together as government we have worked out ways that the most vulnerable in our society such as the disabled and elderly through a highly efficient form of insurance run by said government.

Republican beliefs dictates that anytime people band together for mutual aid that someone can’t make a dollar on shows moral weakness and lack of courage on those people’s part. Better that on should face illness or death rather than turn to a program that is run by an organization that represents the whole and that no individual or company is making money on. The only way that such a concept can be acceptable is if it is transformed into an organization where a few individuals make huge profits. Then it will be acceptable.

Thus Republicans will turn the ACA back into private insurance where the insurance companies will once more control an individual’s access to health care. They will dress it up with health savings accounts that will turn an individual’s savings into a bet at the Wall Street casino. And there will be someone there to collect fees on your money.


They will turn Medicare into a similar insurance program. Good luck to anyone trying to get real coverage. By bringing back clauses on pre-existing conditions you can bet few elderly or disabled will have real coverage. Even if they do, there will be high deductibles (how does $10,000 sound to start?) to pick your pocket with and pass it on to their owners.

And Social Security? Hey, Wall Street – the Republicans are coming to town and they have $2.5 trillion to bet. There will be some huge fees for a few lucky Wall Streeters. Maybe a few that are among the vultures that make up Trump’s cabinet

Somehow this arrangement of having a few wealthy profit immensely from the suffering of the many is moral in Republican world. Ryan has defended his plans to gut food aid even more that has already been done with some old fashioned “you don’t work, you don’t eat” rhetoric and blessed it with some cuts from his Catholic Church.

For those who take morality seriously whether they be religious or not, the thought of seeing someone suffer because they do not have enough money is a moral outrage. The thought of taking someone’s lifetime of savings and force them to give it to the gamblers of Wall Street is a moral outrage. Yet Republicans preparing to do these deeds have no pangs of conscience as they look to reach their lifetime goals of putting the oligarchs in control of all our lives.

By the way, once the right seizes the power in this country, they will work first to make sure it is impossible for them to ever lose it. A very interesting read here which takes a very sobering look at what the consequences of November 8th may really be.

But Donald Trump — and the Republican Party generally, with its tactics of voter suppression, gerrymandering, and political litigation — threatens liberal democracy on both fronts. Trump is a paradox within democracy, a leader elected in a constitutionally legitimate process who seeks to undermine the Constitution itself.

To declare him illegitimate is to shake the foundations of the American system, but to fail to do so is to risk leveling those foundations to the ground.

And so Democrats, including the two most high profile Democrats of all — Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — defaulted to their ordinary posture of declaring the winner of the Electoral College a legitimate president with whom they are eager to work where they can find common ground.

It’s the right posture, nearly all of the time. Liberal democracy depends on the peaceful transfer of power from losers to winners. But what happens when the winner threatens democracy itself?

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Affordable Care Act, Medicare, Social Security, voter suppression | Tagged , | Comments Off on The ACA, Medicare And Morality

Tess Rafferty: Aftermath Of 2016

From the youtube posting of this video:

Tess Rafferty wrote this piece on November 10th, 2016, 48 hours after the election. I (Steve Cohen) suggested we put the post on film. Together with Aaron Barrocas we created this video. Since then it’s been picked up by dailykos.com and Occupy Democrats.

Go to the youtube posting for more information.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Hillary Clinton, Trump | Tagged | Comments Off on Tess Rafferty: Aftermath Of 2016

Some Electoral Math

trump-winter-george-rr-martin

I am no mathematician and hold no claims to be. This last election results sure raise a lot of questions that real math wizards and analysts of electoral politics everywhere are going to be pouring over for a long time.

So I thought I would join in with a few observations of my own:

The first observation is kind of stating the obvious. Small population states have an enormous power in the electoral college in comparison to their populations. They are way overweighted by comparison.

For example, California with 38,500,000 people and 55 electoral votes means that each electoral vote = 700,000 people.

In Iowa we have 3,000,000 people and 6 EVs or one EV for every 500,000 people. That makes a Californian equal to about 2/3rds of an Iowan.

If we go way down to the low population states we see Wyoming with about 580,000 people and 3EVs or 1 EV for every 193,000 people. That makes Wyoming @3.67 times more powerful in the electoral college than California.

I think you get my drift. The electoral college really makes a mockery of 1 man, 1vote democracy concept.

Given the current electoral vote expectations and the current popular votes this would mean that Trump’s 306 EVs on 62.8M votes shows that each EV for Trump represents about 205,000 votes. Each Clinton vote (236 and 65.5 M votes) equals about 277,500 votes per EV. The ratio of Clinton votes per EV (277,500 to 205,000) is around 1.35. Or reversed Clinton got about .75 EV for every EV Trump got even though she won the popular vote convincingly.

BTW – if that .75 ratio looks familiar, it is what an average woman earns doing the same job as a man. Said anther way, the wages of a woman equals 75% that of a man’s in the US. Looks Like Clinton just had the ratio show up in a new way. Woman does better, gets less.

The second observation is that based on vote tallies as of Thursday, Hillary Clinton is almost 2.6 million ahead of Trump and headed for the second highest total popular vote in history behind Barack Obama in 2008. Clinton will get slightly less than 50% due to third party candidates Jill Stein and Gary Johnson pulling approximately 7 million votes or about 5.2%. My figuring is kind of ballpark, but again, you get the drift.

The most recent numbers I see have Clinton at @ 65.5 million, Trump at about 62.8 million and others @ 7 million. This would give not-Trump just short of 54%. This is hardly a mandate.

This will make Trump a minority candidate in both his party’s primary and his run for president. Considering what the Republican Party has done to the election process to restrict voters, Trump’s minority status is probably actually much worse than this election indicates. We have no idea how many potential Clinton voters were not allowed to vote due to restrictive legislation passed in many states following the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision invalidating parts of the Voting Rights Act. Without that boost from the majority Republican SCOTUS Clinton would most likely be president.

From Dana Milbank in the Washington Post Wednesday:

Both (ed. note – claims of rigging and vote recounting) distract from the real scandal, which is happening in plain sight. Millions of would-be voters didn’t participate because of obstacles designed to discourage them. The hurdles were, thanks to a 2013 Supreme Court ruling invalidating key parts of the Voting Rights Act, largely legal. And they arguably suppressed enough minority voters to cost Clinton the election.

Fourteen states had new voting restrictions in place for the first time in a presidential election, and 20 have had such restrictions put in place since 2010, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, a group that opposes such laws. These include strict photo-ID requirements, cutbacks in early voting and new restrictions on registration. Other states are resisting efforts that would make voting easier with same-day, online and motor-voter registration.

At the same time, the Leadership Conference Education Fund, a civil rights group, found that counties previously covered by the Voting Rights Act have closed down at least 868 polling places. The closures (often without adequate notice) disproportionately affect minority voters.

“We have across most states some significant element of voter suppression,” says Zoltan Hajnal, a University of California at San Diego political scientist specializing in voting rights. “Over time these have shrunk the electorate in significant ways and tilted the electorate toward the Republican Party.”

The total number of would-be voters deterred is in the “millions,” he said. “If you were to superimpose the most liberal voting laws on all the states, it’s quite likely we would have had a different winner” on Nov. 8.

A really good analysis of Trump’s historic popular vote loss is done here by inquisitor.com:

The nearly unprecedented scale of Trump’s popular vote loss to Clinton is compounded by the fact that the current president-elect also won the Republican nomination with only 44.95 percent of the total votes cast in the party’s primary elections.

Stated simply, the electoral college with its basis in the slave owning past is way outdated for today’s society.

Posted in #Recount2016, 2016 Election Campaign, Trump, voting rights | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Net Neutrality Back On Chopping Block

al franken on net neutralityAction Alert from Demand Progress

Trump has packed his transition team with Big Telecom lobbyists to help him destroy it.2

Jeffrey Eisenach has worked as a paid consultant for Verizon, and Mark Jamison is a former lobbyist for Sprint. Both are anti-net neutrality zealots, and these are the people Trump has put in charge of the Federal Communications Commission during the transition.

That’s why technology reporters are running articles with banner headlines like, “Bye forever, net neutrality.”3

We’re getting ready to fight back with all we have to save net neutrality. Will you chip in $5?

Jamison has been working on behalf of the telecommunications industry for decades and recently wrote—without a shred of evidence—that “net neutrality in the US is backfiring.”4 Eisenach called net neutrality “crony capitalism pure and simple.”5

But while things might seem bad for net neutrality now, we heard the same predictions of doom during the Obama administration, and even during the George W. Bush administration.

Comcast and their telecom lobbyist buddies have spent tens of millions of dollars to kill the free and open internet, but every time, we’ve stood up to them—and won.

To save the internet, we will use the power of the internet, organizing millions of people all over the country to make phone calls, sign petitions, and attend rallies and public hearings—whatever it takes to stop Trump from destroying net neutrality.

Net neutrality is facing a mortal threat from the Trump presidency. Will you chip in $5 to help save it?

Thanks for standing with us,

David Segal and the Demand Progress Team

 Sources:

1. Donald Trump on Technology, OnTheIssues, accessed November 26, 2016

2. Trump transition team appointments indicate a bid to dismantle net neutrality, TechCrunch, November 21, 2016

3. Bye forever, net neutrality, ThinkProgress, November 22, 2016

4. It’s time to move beyond net neutrality, Tech Policy Daily, June 15, 2016

5. Trump Appoints Two Anti-Net Neutrality Advocates To Oversee FCC Transition, Forbes, November 21, 2016

Posted in Internet Issues | Tagged , | Comments Off on Net Neutrality Back On Chopping Block

24 Hours of Reality — 2016 Edition

Who knows what President Trump’s impact on the environment will be?

To hold ground environmental advocates have claimed since the Nixon administration, we can’t ignore the renewed challenges presented by the mogul’s rise to power.

We don’t know what Trump will do, however, environmental advocates have been stroking against the current all along. The stakes are too high to give up now, nor will we.

We are stronger together so I plan to join with my colleagues at The Climate Reality Project for mutual support and direction. A perfectly timed kickoff is the 24 Hours of Reality webcast scheduled Dec. 5 and 6. I will tune in for at least part of it and encourage readers to do likewise.

Here’s what our chairman had to say after the election:

In every great struggle humanity has undertaken, the march towards progress has included both successes and setbacks. And the struggle to protect and save the Earth’s ecological system is no exception.

Today, I am as optimistic and resolved as ever that we will solve the climate crisis. Our collective efforts are dependent not on politics or ideology — or elections — but on our commitment to each other, to the health of our planet and to a sustainable future for all.
We must — and will — continue to find hope and joy in our work that will define humanity for generations.

Last night President-elect Trump said he wanted to be a president for all Americans. In that spirit, I hope that he will work with the overwhelming majority of us who believe that the climate crisis is the greatest threat we face as a nation.

I wish him well in these efforts and intend to do everything I can to work with him and his administration to ensure that our nation remains a leader in the global effort to meet this challenge. Moreover, there is reason to believe that it is not naive or Pollyannaish to hope for more than what we fear.

We have already made great strides to solve the climate crisis all around the world. The work that has been done by civil society, businesses, investors, and governments at all levels will continue to be driven by the fact that solutions to the climate crisis are not just vital to our planet, but are vital to our economy. The market forces driving the transition to a sustainable economy simply will not be slowed.

Less than a year ago, when the historic Paris Agreement was reached, we knew that our journey was only beginning. We knew this work would not be easy – indeed, more would be required. Now we know that our work must be redoubled.

Today, without regard to last night’s outcome, we must turn our focus to making the promises of the Paris Agreement a reality by embracing the forces that are already working to grow our economy and transform our energy future.

A sustainable future is in sight – but we cannot take it for granted. We must fight for the future we all believe in. Now, more than ever, our planet needs us – and I’m inspired by the knowledge that we’ll take the path forward together.

Al Gore
Founder and Chairman
The Climate Reality Project

Closer to home, I’ve long followed State Senator Rob Hogg who is an advocate for protecting the environment and a member of The Climate Reality Project. Recently elected minority leader in the Iowa Senate, Hogg offered this advice:

Continue to speak up with elected officials. A Doubting Thomas today can be a leader for climate action tomorrow. Remind Republicans of their successes including the Clean Air Act, the Montreal Protocol, and solar energy investment tax credits. Do not let them off the hook by ignoring them.

Midway through my seventh decade of life it is time to get more active. I am ready for what lies ahead and the road forward.

Posted in Environment | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 24 Hours of Reality — 2016 Edition

Why Trump Will Not Deliver Campaign Promises

Thom Hartmann speaks with Eamonn Fingleton, commentator for Forbes, about why Trump will not be able to accomplish his goals on trade and other policies.

 

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign | Tagged | Comments Off on Why Trump Will Not Deliver Campaign Promises

Help Stop Eminent Domain Abuse In Iowa

eminent-domain-photo

Action Alert from Bold Iowa:

Dakota Access came to our state two years ago and began trying to buy off landowners and farmers to get permission to run a pipeline roughshod through their property.

Those who resisted were subjected to eminent domain law, which says that the state has the right to take their land — even against their will — for projects that benefit the “public good.”

But our government officials are far overreaching their authority in order to help their rich and powerful friends. A pipeline that benefits a private company and would transport oil mostly for export is not for the “public good.”

Now, nine Iowa landowners who continue to resist construction of the pipeline on their land are suing the state and Dakota Access to stop this abuse of eminent domain law.

Sign the petition to the Iowa Legislature: I stand with Iowa landowners against eminent domain for private gain. 

The outcome of this lawsuit will affect whether the pipeline construction moves forward, and whether eminent domain can be abused in the future in this state. Iowa should be a place where families who’ve lived here for generations are respected and have the right to decide what to do with their private land.

What’s more, the Dakota Access pipeline would be a disaster for our land and water. It disrupts precious soil that’s been farmed by our families for generations, and a leak would threaten over 200 waterways, poisoning the water we drink and that farmers use to grow our food. Bakken oil also contains cancer-causing chemicals that are a direct threat to human health.

The pipeline construction is almost finished, and the pivotal court hearing is in just three weeks. Stand in court with landowners at the Dec. 15 hearing. Click here for details and share on Facebook.

Your support is crucial right now.

Tell the Iowa Legislature: Stop eminent domain abuse. Click here to sign the petition.

Thanks for standing with Iowa’s farmers.

Ed Fallon and the Bold Iowa team

P.S. Tomorrow, Dec. 29 is Giving Tuesday! Click here to contribute to Bold Iowa’s work to protect our land, water and climate`

Posted in Bakken pipeline | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Help Stop Eminent Domain Abuse In Iowa