Reynolds Misses The Mark By A Country Mile

cci action fund

Email from Adam Mason with Iowa Citizens For Community Improvement on their view of Kim Reynold’s “State of the State” Address last Tuesday:

I just finished watching Gov. Kim Reynolds deliver her second Condition of the State address.

Here’s our take: She missed the truth by a country mile with an address filled with falsehoods and half-truths that paint a rosy picture of what it’s like for folks across Iowa, especially in rural areas.

What we hear from people across the state paints a much different story.

In her address, Reynolds highlighted (amongst other issues):

•Achievements last year in funding water quality,

•Efforts to expand healthcare access around the state,

•Balancing the state budget, and

•Restoring felon voting rights.

CCI Action members want to call out the truth: 

•Factory Farms and Water Quality: Her “funding” for water quality efforts was simply shifted around from existing state revenues that are already stretched thin. And that money is being dumped into Iowa’s failed voluntary Nutrient Reduction Strategy faster than the factory farm manure entering Iowa’s waterways, as evidenced by the ever-increasing number of impaired waterways around the state. All while the factory farm industry continues to expand at an alarming rate, threatening Iowans’ quality of life for private gain.

•

•Healthcare: The two Managed Care Organizations (MCO’s) currently servicing Iowa’s Medicaid program continue to deny needed care to vulnerable Iowans, delay payments to service providers, and gouge public revenues to underwrite their profits. It’s immoral and an outrage.

•

•We’re in a revenue crisis: We’re pointing to mid-year budget cuts under her short tenure and the depletion of our state’s cash reserves under her watch. The GOP’s tax cuts for the wealthiest and corporate few have devastating impacts on our communities.

•Restoring voting rights: Iowa doesn’t need to wait four years to amend our constitution to restore rights and dignity to thousands of returning citizens. Reynolds can restore their vote with an executive order, just like Branstad took them away on his first day in office back in 2011. This is political posturing on her part, leaving these Iowans hanging until after the 2022 elections. And, she needs to squash Iowa’s new Voter ID laws.

She had a lot to say about supporting everyday Iowans, urban and rural, but missed the mark.

Iowans are ready for a state and elected leaders that put people before corporate interests!

Agree? Check out this beautiful image our Digital Organizer Cat made and give it share on Facebook with the words “Iowa is ready”.

 Adam Mason,

State Policy Organizing Director

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Iowa legislature 2019, Kim Reynolds, Republican Policy | Tagged | 1 Comment

Why Condemn King Now?

A 3 minute videos from just before the midterm election. At that time King was a campaign co-chair for Kim Reynolds. Reynolds refused to disavow King at that time. She won with votes from King’s district. Political opportunism, anyone?

We all try to build models of how we expect people to react to news stories and events. We do this so we will be able to deal not only with the story or event, but also so we can understand the reactions. It also helps us get an idea where some story or event might lead us.

For example, pretty much from the day that Donald Trump became a candidate, Republicans have gone into a mode of pretending that his behavior is normal. Treats women like dirt? Everybody does. A bunch of bankruptcies? Doesn’t everybody? Conspire with a foreign enemy? Haven’t all presidents?

So we hear another abomination from Trump and the reaction – or actual lack of reaction – pours out of his party. Conspired with Putin? So what – we are getting our judges, so we don’t care.

Trump’s Republican Party has become masterful in their ignoring reality and creating an alternative universe where what Trump and other nefarious critters do is considered normal. Nazi march in Charlottesville – everybody does it. 

Which is why the reaction to Steve King’s latest racist remark is so surprising. Usually the reaction to a King remark by his party is to yawn. Remember just last fall when Kim Reynolds had Mr. King as a co-chair of her campaign. Mr. King had just made yet another of his racially tinged comments. When asked if she would remove King as her co-chair, she demurred and said (I paraphrase) “Geez, I can’t be the police to what everybody says, now can I?”

We will just use that as an example of how most members of King’s Party have treated his remarks for – oh – ever since he’s been elected. When asked about a King comment the typical response was to smile, deflect and ignore. 

So what went wrong this time? When I heard what King had said my immediate reaction was to prepare for the usual response (see above) from the usual suspects. Grassley would seldom respond. Ernst nearly said something once two years ago, but showing her usual courage she backed down. I fully expected that Reynolds would go into an all out stall and deflection mode figuring she’s got four years before she has to stand for election and this will all be long forgotten by then.

The fact that any Republican said anything surprised me.  When I heard that Tim Scott senator from South Carolina said something I wasn’t overwhelmingly surprised since he has been speaking out about race a little bit lately. But then to hear Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy say the Party might pull King’s committee assignments, I was shocked. (They have since pulled his committee assignments.)

Then it seemed like the snowball was rolling downhill and even Grassley, Ernst and Reynolds couldn’t get out of the way. What ever did King do to deserve this treatment from colleagues that never cared a bit before? 

What he did is nearly lost in an almost impossible to lose district. And a good part of the reason he almost lost was his overt racism. Based on this and what can be expected to be two more years of Trump being by far the worst president (or elected official of any stripe) ever in this country, another election with Steve King on the ballot along with Trump in the top spot could easily spell disaster even in one of America’s reddest districts.

Thus when King gave them an opening they pounced like vultures on a fresh road kill. Much like road kill, King never knew what hit him. 

Kim Reynolds about face is the most laughable and hypocritical of all. Once she got what she wanted out of King she was ready with the knives as soon as there was an opportunity. With friends like that, who needs enemies, right Mr. King.

And then there is the opportunist Randy Feenstra. One has to think that his candidacy against King in the fourth district was orchestrated to be ready to exploit the next King snafu which is always only a week or so away. Like any good Republican, Feenstra will leave no carcass unpicked.

As for Joni Ernst it is another sad, sad chapter in the continuing story of a politician who can choose to do the right thing or take the cowards way out. After 5 years of total cowardice on Ernst’s part, suddenly she finds courage – after it appears that everybody else is going that way.

This just adds to her support for Brett Kavanaugh when she could have struck a blow for women by voting against him and her refusal to take any stand at odds with Trump. She is sure wasting a valuable seat in the senate that was so recently filled by a person who was such a champion of the common Iowan.

Way to go, Joni. It is people like you that make Iowa a laughingstock. 

And if you (Ernst) are truly horrified by Steve King’s racism and claim it doesn’t belong in your party, let me tell you about the guy that is a racist, a misogynist, a person who mocks the disabled and native Americans and who has proudly proclaimed himself a “nationalist” much like Steve King. This guy’s name is Donald Trump. Show us you mean it, Ernst. Stand up to Trump.

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2020 election campaign, Blog for Iowa, Charles Grassley, Joni Ernst, Kim Reynolds, Republican hypocrisy, Steve King | Tagged | Comments Off on Why Condemn King Now?

Boone County Land Owners Win Court Case Against DAPL

From our inbox:  Here’s some good news from Ed Fallon @ Bold Iowa.  Check out Bold Iowa’s website. “We build rural-urban coalitions to fight climate change, prevent the abuse of eminent domain, protect Iowa’s soil, air, and water, and promote non-industrial renewable energy.”

###

For those who feel Big Oil always gets its way, think again. In a battle of Lamb vs. Lion (read on and you’ll see what I mean), the little guy and gal just accomplished something impressive.

Judy and Dick Lamb with a photograph of their Boone County farm before the Dakota Access Pipeline came through.

When the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) was still under discussion, most Iowa landowners I met as I walked the pipeline route were against it. In the end, many signed voluntary easements — not because they wanted to but because they felt they had no choice.

Dick and Judy Lamb, whose farm in Boone County was bisected by DAPL, opposed the pipeline from the start. They continue to do so, and their steadfastness just paid off. Literally.

Yesterday (Wednesday, January 16), the Lambs achieved an important victory against DAPL. In district court in Boone, Iowa, after a trial that lasted seven days, a jury ruled in favor of the Lambs, ordering DAPL to compensate them for the lost potential of their property due to the pipeline.

In 2016, the Lambs refused to sign an easement with DAPL for access to their land along Highway 30, two miles from the city limits of Ames. While the Lambs had not developed the property themselves, it struck them as grossly unfair for DAPL to take that opportunity away from them and their children, who would inherit the land. They believed that a hot pipeline would render their property unsuitable for many types of potential development. The Lambs had raised this issue with DAPL prior to being forced into condemnation, but the company refused to recognize any developmental potential for their land.

So the Lambs took DAPL to court. “We knew it would be an uphill fight against a highly proficient, specialized legal team,” Dick told me in an interview after the trial. “Their attorneys travel the country doing just this type of litigation, so they’re probably the best in the business. In fact, after they presented their case at the trial, I wondered whether we’d get anything at all.”

In one of many recent David-vs-Goliath lawsuits pitting pipeline opponents against Big Oil, the Lambs prevailed — at least to their satisfaction. “The jury awarded us $250,000,” said Dick. “We’d asked for $900,000, and out of the $250,000 reward comes the $90,000 we received after our condemnation hearing in 2016, and roughly another $50,000 in legal expenses. That doesn’t leave us a lot, but we certainly count it as a victory.”

The Lambs went on to note that, for technical reasons not easily explained, this particular lawsuit addressed the pipeline damage to just half of their land along Highway 30. There likely will be another trial this summer regarding the other half.

Both Judy and Dick said the experience of the trial helped restore their faith in the legal system. They were impressed that the jury remained attentive through hours of highly technical presentations on land-valuation issues, and after six hours of deliberation, issued a fair ruling.

Any day now, the Iowa Supreme Court will issue its ruling in Puntenney v. Iowa Utilities Board — the lawsuit filed by nine landowners and the Iowa Sierra Club over the Board’s decision to grant eminent domain to a private pipeline company. This landmark case isn’t the only legal action pending against DAPL. Other Iowa landowners have filed suits over soil compaction, ruined terraces, tile damage, and uncompensated crop loss.

I asked Dick and Judy how they felt about the threat of either a second pipeline coming through their land or the possibility that DAPL would increase the amount of oil it pumps through the existing pipeline. “Either of those options is a scary thought,” said Judy. “For now, the big picture is we showed that it’s possible to beat DAPL in court. That should give hope to other landowners who have lawsuits pending.”

Indeed, though the Lambs’ trial received little fanfare and almost no mainstream press coverage, their victory is a big deal. It’s further indication that the tide is turning against Big Oil and the politicians who do its bidding. The Lambs’ efforts should inspire all of us to persevere — and to support the landowners, farmers, and Native communities on the front lines of this and other fossil-fuel infrastructure fights.

Ed Fallon
Bold Iowa
735 19th St.
Des Moines, IA 50314

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | Comments Off on Boone County Land Owners Win Court Case Against DAPL

How Democrats Are Beating Trump At His Own Game

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Loebsack Calls For King To Resign

Congressman Dave Loebsack

Loebsack: For the Good of Iowa, Steve King Needs to Resign

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Dave Loebsack today called on Rep. Steve King to resign for the good of the people of Iowa. While Steve King has a long history of making hateful and disgusting remarks, by having his committee assignments taken away, he is no longer able to effectively serve the people of Iowa. Loebsack also announced today that he has become an original cosponsor of Rep. Tim Ryan’s bipartisan resolution to censure Steve King for his history of making hateful and disgusting remarks. Earlier today, Loebsack sent a letter to Rep. King outlining his position.

“I have repeatedly called out Steve King when he has made disgusting and vile comments. His words and beliefs should have no place in public discourse. Additionally, Steve has made no effort to change his behavior and I believe it is past time for him to be held accountable for his actions.

“Iowans deserve a Congressman who is able to fight on their behalf and now that Steve’s committee assignments have been taken away, he is unable to truly be a representative for the people. Iowans deserve someone who can serve without distraction, and advocate for the people of their district. It is clear that Steve is no longer able to serve in that capacity and should, for the good of Iowa, resign and pass the important responsibilities of this office to another.”

###

Connect with Dave Online

cid:image001.png@01CDF494.BB4634D0cid:image002.png@01CDF494.BB4634D0cid:image003.png@01CDF494.BB4634D0cid:image004.png@01CDF494.BB4634D0

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Wisconsin Court Rules For Stein Recount

I’m not a fan of Jill Stein’s inflammatory, overly cynical, self-serving Democrat bashing.  That said, I don’t think  she was involved in any way in the Russian conspiracy. I tend to believe her story of why she was in a picture with Putin in Moscow of 2015.  So in the spirit of giving credit where credit is due, Stein is doing something incredibly important that no one else thought was worthwhile enough to bother with, and is winning court decisions. 

The following is a press release from last week from Stein Recount 2016 on VotingJustice.us

Court Rules for Stein Recount, Denying Attempt to Prevent Public Disclosure of Voting Machine Inspection

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THURSDAY, JANUARY 10, 2019
Stein Recount 2016

Today, former Green Party Presidential nominee Jill Stein announced another win in her push for election integrity in the 2016 recount follow up. She hailed a Wisconsin court ruling that denied a request by voting equipment corporations that would have barred any public disclosure of the findings of a groundbreaking examination of voting machine software that the Stein campaign will conduct. The voting machine corporations sought the gag rule in the wake of a Wisconsin Elections Commission decision allowing the Stein campaign to inspect this software and review its accuracy and reliability.

“This decision is a huge win for voters everywhere, and for the common-sense principle that the accuracy and reliability of our voting system is more important than shielding corporations from scrutiny,” said Dr. Stein. “As the Wisconsin Elections Commission ruled and the court affirmed, the law is unambiguously on our side. If the voting machine corporations had their way, we’d be prohibited from disclosing our findings under penalty of law, even if we discovered evidence of problems that could have changed the outcome of the election.”

“The only reason for voting machine corporations to push for a gag rule was to prevent us from revealing any problems with their machines, which would threaten their ability to keep profiting off our elections. It’s outrageous that we’ve had to go to court to argue that the integrity of our elections is more important than protecting corporations.”

“When we launched the 2016 recount with the support of over 161,000 people, we knew it wasn’t just a single election people were worried about, but the whole system. Over and over, we heard the concern that the computers and technology that were supposed to make our elections modern and reliable had instead made them more vulnerable. So when the recount in Wisconsin made it possible to examine voting machine software, we jumped at the rare opportunity to look inside the voting machines to see if they deserve the immense trust we’re told to put in them.”

“Wisconsin law allows us to conduct a groundbreaking state-wide examination of the voting machine “source code” – a crucial piece of voting machine software that controls the actual counting and tallying of the votes. This decision allows us to start preparing for the first-ever independent post-election examination of voting machine source code.”

The Wisconsin decision is the latest in a series of victories for election integrity resulting from the 2016 recount effort, including a recent settlement with the state of Pennsylvania to replace easily-hacked paperless voting machines with paper ballots and institute automatic vote audits. This precedent raises the bar for election integrity across the country. It adds to previous victories in Michigan and Wisconsin after the recount identified voting machine failures, leading to the replacement of faulty machines.

The Wisconsin court decision can be seen here.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Wisconsin Court Rules For Stein Recount

CCI Update for Legislative Session 2019


From Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (CCI):

On Monday, 150 state legislators descend on Des Moines for the 2019 legislative session.
And over the next 110 days they will introduce, consider, debate, and pass policies that impact us all in every aspect of our lives: policies on factory farms and clean water, healthcare, education, working conditions, our state budget, and more.  We’ll be your eyes and ears at the Capitol tracking bills – good and bad – to let you know when your calls, emails, or weekend visits with your legislator can have a big impact.  To help you get ready, here is our take on what we can expect going into this year’s General Assembly.

Who’s at the table

Kim Reynolds will be inaugurated as Governor next week. We’ll know more about her priorities after Tuesday’s State of the State address, but we’ve heard she is prioritizing cutting even more taxes in spite of tight revenues – which forced cuts over the previous two years.

Republicans control the Statehouse. They will (largely) call the shots. The GOP majority in the Senate is 32-18; and the GOP majority in the House is 54-46 (pending an ongoing review of votes cast in the NE IA House District 55 race).

What’s on the table

We’ve heard bits and pieces of policy agendas from legislative leaders and the governor.

Key priorities for the Iowa GOP:

  • Cutting taxes to benefit corporations and the extremely wealthy in spite of tight budgets and drastic cuts the last few years;
  • Fiddling around the margins of Reynolds’s privatized Medicaid mess, but not fixing the problems with our healthcare system;
  • Imposing stricter work requirements for low-income and out-of-work Iowans who receive assistance in spite of historically low unemployment.

Key Priorities for Iowa Democrats:

  • Increasing funding for Iowa’s education system and addressing student debt;
  • Returning Medicaid to state-run care and increasing mental health
    services;
  • Restoring workers’ rights, which have been attacked in recent years.

Additional hot button issues on the table:

  • Granting another power grab to MidAmerican and Alliant Energy by restricting Iowans’ access to renewable energy;
  • Gutting IPERS (Iowa’s public employees earned pensions) as part of a manufactured budget crisis;
  • Establishing more workforce training programs and addressing state staffing levels in the courts and prison system; and
  • Altering the voter-approved funding formulas for IWILL: that means sending more taxpayer money to fix the water pollution caused by corporations with no oversight.

We could see other issues pop up, and we’ll be on the lookout for other measures that benefit corporate power and the 1% at the expense of our people and the planet.

What we’re bringing to the table

Our agenda comes from you and the issues you have been organizing on year-round. We’re pushing for:

Healthcare for all/getting profits out of healthcare. That means ending privatized Medicaid servicing, establishing the CARE Act to prioritize and support caregivers, and moving towards a single-payer style universal healthcare program that leaves no one behind.

A food & farm system that works for farmers, workers, eaters, and the environment. That means a moratorium on factory farms, local control, and more oversight of factory farms, as well as policies that support family farmers and force Big Ag to pay to clean up Iowa’s water crisis.

Racial justice. That means banning the practice of racial profiling by Iowa law enforcement. We’ll also fight attempts to force law enforcement to act as ICE agents or other policies that force those of us without documentation or in mixed status families into the shadows.

Action on climate change. That means moving to 100% renewable energy for 100% of the people and making sure that all Iowans (not just those who can afford it) benefit from transitioning to renewable energy, and fighting the power grabs by corporate utilities who seek to prioritize their profits over our lives.

Voter justice. That means removing the influence of big money on our political system and fighting any attempts at voter suppression or fiddling with Iowa’s model for a nonpartisan redistricting process.

In the future, we want to run the table

Policy making should be the people’s business, not done behind closed doors by industry insiders. We believe those most impacted by a problem should be in the driver’s seat to craft the solution. We believe in fighting for what our communities need, not what some view as winnable in the moment.

In order to win our vision for Iowa, we need to change who is at the statehouse. We need more folks like you, who come out of our work together, running for office.  Our organizing work, paired with our statehouse work, paired with more work in elections will help us set the political stage on which the 2020 caucuses and elections are played out.

Before we go, what’s on our radar:

As always, let me know what you are hearing in your community – from neighbors and from your elected officials.

And thanks for all you do for a people and planet first Iowa!

Adam Mason
State Policy Organizing Director
P.S. We’ll be letting you know every week about forums in your neck of the woods. Find those, and our toolkits on our website.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | 1 Comment

Reminders: Monday, IPERS Press Conference; Saturday, Women’s March

Image (1) progress-iowa.jpg for post 17381As the Iowa legislature gears up for another session with Republicans in total control, common Iowans will be taking action to protect the retirement that they worked so hard for. Republicans have been itching to turn that money over to money managers who could then start raking fees for managing those accounts.

From progressiowa.org email:

Des Moines, Iowa — Iowans will speak out at the capitol on the first day of the legislative session to call on Governor Reynolds and the legislature to keep promises made on the campaign trail and respect their retirement. Vital retirement programs have been under serious threat recently, such as the Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System, better known as IPERS. More than 350,000 Iowans would have their economic security threatened if IPERS is changed, and on Monday Iowans will stand up against potential threats to their retirement.

Monday’s press conference will be hosted by the Iowa Coalition for Retirement Security, in partnership with AFSCME Council 61, the Iowa State Education Association, and the Iowa Federation of Labor AFL-CIO. Speakers will encourage Iowans to participate in a day of action on January 23rd, which will include contacting elected officials and sharing facts about retirement security online.

EVENT DETAILS:

WHO:

 Everyday Iowans speaking out for retirement security

WHAT:

 Iowa Coalition for Retirement Security Press Conference

WHEN:

 Monday, January 14th, 12:00 PM

WHERE:

 Iowa State Capitol, Room 116, 1007 E Grand Ave, Des Moines

Contacts:

Lance Coles, (515) 262-9571

Jean Hessburg, (515) 314-8799

Mazie Stilwell, (515) 246-1517

WOMEN”S MARCH

Women's March 2019

The second reminder is that the 3rd Annual Women’s March is scheduled for next Saturday in Washington, DC with sister marches in Des Moines and Red Oak, Iowa and Omaha, Nebraska.

Someone brought up the concern that the government shutdown may stop the Women’s March. The answer is that it will not! From the FAQ section of the Women’s March homepage:  

IF THE GOVERNMENT IS SHUT DOWN, IS THE MARCH STILL ON?

They can shut down the government but they can’t shut down the #WomensWave! This is a First Amendment protected activity — shutdown or no shutdown, we are marching.

MARCH ON!!!

Omaha:

Omaha Women’s March

January 20, 2019 • 1:00 PM

Downtown Omaha

TBD

Omaha, NE 68102

Red Oak, Iowa:

January 19, 2019 • 10:00 AM

Legion Park

101 E Cherry St

Red Oak, IA 51566

Des Moines:

January 19, 2019 • 11:00 AM

Des Moines Capitol

1007 E Grand Ave

Des Moines, IA 50319

Women’s March on Washington

Start: January 19, 2019 • 10:00 AM

12th Street and the National Mall• 12th Street and Jefferson Drive SW, Washington D.C., DC 20001

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Calls to Action, Progress Iowa | Tagged , | Comments Off on Reminders: Monday, IPERS Press Conference; Saturday, Women’s March

Sunday Funday: Holding The Country Hostage Edition

Planning on eating today? You may want to stay away from fresh fruits and vegetables since our government food inspectors are locked out from doing their work. For business, this would be a good time to cut a few corners and save a few bucks, right? 

Taking an airplane trip? Security agents are missing work in high volumes since they aren’t getting paid. Air traffic controllers are also. Their ranks were already thin. 

Doing a little sight-seeing at some of our country’s national parks or monuments? Bad timing.

It is almost as if some terrorist has taken control of our government and stopped some of the country’s most basic services. I do not know if that is true, but somewhere in Moscow a man named Vlad Putin most likely has a huge smile on his face as he once again sees the US being ground to a halt by his friend Donald.

Oy Vey, what a mess.

  1. 13 year old Jayme Closs was able to escape her abductor 3 months after her parents were murdered and she was abducted in what nearby state?
  1. Dear Leader twittered that he will cut off FEMA funds to what state?
  1. In an interview on 60 minutes Sunday night who said there is “no question” that Dear Leader is a racist?
  1. Speaking of racists, who had a hard time understanding that “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” were offensive?
  1. Dear Leader called a meeting with congressional leaders Wednesday. Who walked out of that meeting within a few minutes after it started?
  1. Cyntoia Brown was granted clemency for the crime of murdering the man who was sex-trafficking her in what state?
  1. A federal judge ruled what law that stopped undercover investigations of livestock facilities unconstitutional Wednesday?
  1. What prominent Iowa Republican state senator announced his primary candidacy for Iowa’s 4th US congressional seat?
  1. All four living what contradicted Dear Leader’s claim that they are all in favor of a border wall?
  1. Thanks to a resounding referendum victory in November, 1.5 million ex-felons will be able to vote in what state starting last Monday?
  1. Dear Leader claimed there were 4,000 what stopped at the border the first half of 2018. Data showed only 6 what were actually stopped?
  1. Sears – is it still in business or not?
  1. What major figure in the probe into Russian sabotage of the 2016 election is expected to leave the DOJ in the next few weeks?
  1. What billionaire announced he would not run for president in 2020?
  1. What late night TV host is giving jobs to furloughed federal employees during the shutdown?
  1. This ought to be some settlement. What super rich person is being divorced by his wife?
  1. Dear Leader, Jr. drew major backlash when he compared daddy’s border wall to what kind of an enclosure?
  1. Paul Manafort’s legal team filed a poorly redacted file that revealed that Manafort gave what information to a Russian contact?
  1. It’s just a part-time job. What politician sold $35 million worth of real estate last year?
  1. What Dear Leader lawyer claimed Friday that the Trump team should be able to “correct” the Mueller report before any of it is made public?

John Fugelsang on Twitter:

Steve King proves that the most common trait of ignorant racists is a total ignorance that they’re racist.

Answers:

  1. Wisconsin
  1. California – a little confused whether he said he will or he wants to – either way it is the wrong thing to do.
  1. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
  1. Iowa’s own Steve King
  1. Dear Leader – threw a tantrum and walked out
  1. Tennessee
  1. Iowa’s famous Ag-gag law
  1. Randy Feenstra
  1. Presidents
  1. Florida
  1. People with names on the terrorist watch list. This does not mean any of the 6 were terrorists.
  1. I think so. Sort of.
  1. Rod Rosenstein
  1. Tom Steyer
  1. Jimmy Kimmel
  1. Jeff Bezos
  1. A zoo fence. Seriously,  junior?
  1. Polling data
  1. Dear Leader
  1. Rudy Giuliani – wouldn’t every criminal want that deal?

Did you ever consider that a man who paid $135,000 for one sex act with a porn star is maybe not quite the great deal maker he claims himself to be?

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Holding The Country Hostage Edition

IDP Email, Part 2: Defeat Joni Ernst Fund

joni-ernst-the-perfect-Koch-investment

I hope the email from IDP is not supposed to be secret because I am really happy to spread what I believe is a brilliant idea: let’s start now and build up a fund for whatever Democrat comes out of the primaries as Joni Ernst’s opponent. 

A model for such a pre-campaign money raiser for an unknown candidate was recently hashed for the future opponent of Senator Susan Collins in Maine after she diddled and dawdled about her vote on the Kavanaugh nomination. In the process she pissed a majority of Mainers who decided to do something serious about unseating her. As any political person these days know, campaigns cost money.

From the second part of the IDP email:

But we can do a LOT to address the other Senator from Iowa: Joni Ernst. So here’s what I’m prescribing to you to help fix that upset stomach you got about Chuck Grassley (remember, not a doctor): Make a donation to our Defeat Joni Ernst Fund so we can send a true champion for Iowa families to the Senate.

If you’ve saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:

Express Donate: $5

Express Donate: $10

Express Donate: $27

Express Donate: $50

Or, donate another amount

It’s bad enough that Grassley moved up in the ranks in the Senate. But that move also opened up a spot on the Judiciary Committee — and his handpicked replacement was Senator Joni Ernst.

Joni Ernst is already following in Chuck Grassley’s footsteps — could you imagine if one day she ended up as the Chair of the Judiciary, or even Senate Pro Tempore?

We can’t let that happen. So we’re going to put a stop to Joni Ernst’s hyper-partisan agenda at the ballot box. But it won’t be easy.

Click here to make a donation to our Defeat Joni Ernst Fund — which is our very first step toward putting together an organization and a campaign that will have the resources to defeat her in 2020.

Looks like a fund to raise some campaign funds for the Democratic senate nominee has been established. 

If anything, the money raised from this fundraiser will help to level a money race that saw Ernst get over $3 million in “help” from the NRA and Koch brother super PACS.    

Of course with that kind of money you buy access. Most of us can think of instances where an Ernst statement or vote may have been “influenced” to be more favorable to the NRA or to billionaires than to average Iowans. Think of the vote for Brett Kavanaugh or the huge tax give away to the wealthy passed last year.

Add to votes like that the fact that Ernst has been a toady for Donald Trump and it is not surprising to find that a Public Policy Polling in Iowa found Ernst with a flat approval rating and support for the government shutdown in Iowa well below water. 

Considering that Ernst’s votes are pretty well pre-determined (see the discussion of influence above)  we are getting from Ernst, we could just as well have a Chatty Cathy doll in that seat.

Since neither you nor I nor anyone we know has Koch brother or NRA type money, we need to band together and build a fund over a period of time that can challenge a senator for sale like Joni Ernst.

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2020 election campaign, Blog for Iowa, Joni Ernst, Koch Brothers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on IDP Email, Part 2: Defeat Joni Ernst Fund