Corporate Media Not Reporting Accurately On Net Neutrality Repeal

This issue may not be as exciting as the presidential campaigns, but it is an ongoing battle of great importance that we should not ignore. Help keep the fight for net neutrality going. Here’s a note from Fight for the Future. FFTF  is a nonprofit advocacy group in the area of digital rights founded in 2011.

It’s been more than a year since Ajit Pai repealed net neutrality, and ISPs have been caught red-handed again and again throttling data and slowing down websites.

But if you’re only listening to corporate media, you probably didn’t know about any of that. The Wall Street Journal claimed net neutrality repeal occurred “without incident.”1 Forbes said “nothing of note” had happened since the repeal.2

It’s no surprise that the corporate media isn’t telling the truth about net neutrality. Most of them are owned by companies that stand to profit enormously from ending net neutrality. That’s why it’s up to us to call out big Cable and give voters the facts they need to hold anti-net neutrality members of Congress accountable.

FCC Chairman and former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai has blatantly lied to the public over and over again about net neutrality, despite the more than 80% of people who favor the rules.

He lied about the more than one million anti-net neutrality comments by bots impersonating real people on the FCC website.3 His claim that a DDOS attack shut down the FCC website during a flood of pro-net neutrality comments turned out to be a lie, too.4 And he had to retract erroneous data he spread about broadband speeds increasing post-net neutrality, as well as false information about investment in infrastructure.5

Since the repeal of net neutrality, Big Cable ISPs have slowed speeds to competing sites, forced paying customers to watch advertisements to reach content, and even throttled the service of a fire department in the middle of the wildfire.6

But the corporate media is still parroting Pai’s talking points despite the fact that they were exposed as false.

We can’t count on the corporate media to tell the truth about net neutrality. That’s why Fight for the Future needs to be out there every day, alerting the public about these abuses and demanding that Congress reinstate net neutrality.

Will you make a donation to help fight Big Cable lies and restore net neutrality?

DONATE

For the Internet,
Evan at Fight for the Future


Footnotes:

1. The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/dont-forget-the-net-neutrality-panic-11560553157

2. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/06/25/reflecting-on-one-year-without-net-neutrality/#4dda15e4edc8

3. Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/bots-broke-fcc-public-comment-system/

4. Vice: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bj9ypw/american-isps-are-better-than-ever-fcc-proclaims-in-study-based-on-flawed-data

5. Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/02/ajit-pai-fcc-broadband-growth-figures-error/

6. Public Knowledge: https://www.publicknowledge.org/news-blog/blogs/broadband-providers-are-quietly-taking-advantage-of-an-internet-without-net-neutrality-protections

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Corporate Media Not Reporting Accurately On Net Neutrality Repeal

Iowa State Fair Political Soapbox Schedule

Andrew Yang, Democrat

“Iowa has a great system. It’s where a candidate nobody’s ever heard of is taken seriously.”  – Howard Dean

The Iowa State Fair Soapbox schedule will be updated online if changes occur. 

Can’t make the fair this year?  The Des Moines Register will livestream all of the speakers at DesMoinesRegister.com/Soapbox.

Thursday, Aug. 8

  • 12:45 p.m.: Democrat Steve Bullock, the sitting governor of Montana.
  • 1:30 p.m.: Democrat Joe Biden, a former vice president and former U.S. senator from Delaware.

Friday, Aug. 9

  • 9 a.m.: Democrat Julián Castro, secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President Barack Obama and the former mayor of San Antonio, Texas.
  • 10:30 a.m.: Democrat Andrew Yang, a businessman.
  • 11:15 a.m.: Democrat Beto O’Rourke, a former U.S. representative from Texas.
  • Noon: Democrat John Delaney, a former U.S. representative from Maryland.
  • 1:30 p.m.: Democrat Marianne Williamson, an author and activist.
  • 2:15 p.m.: Democrat Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. representative for Hawaii’s 2nd Congressional District.

Saturday, Aug. 10

  • 9 a.m.: Democrat Jay Inslee, the sitting governor of Washington.
  • 10:30 a.m.: Democrat Kamala Harris, a U.S. senator from California.
  • 11:15 a.m.: Democrat Tim Ryan, the U.S. representative for Ohio’s 13th Congressional District.
  • 12:45 p.m.: Democrat Amy Klobuchar, a U.S. senator from Minnesota.
  • 1:30 p.m.: Democrat Joe Sestak, a former U.S. representative from Pennsylvania and retired vice admiral in the U.S. Navy.
  • 2:15 p.m.: Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand, a U.S. senator from New York.
  • 3 p.m.: Democrat John Hickenlooper, a former governor of Colorado.
  • 3:45 p.m.: Democrat Elizabeth Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts.
  • 4:30 p.m.: Democrat Cory Booker, a U.S. senator from New Jersey.

Sunday, Aug. 11

  • 11:15 a.m.: Republican Bill Weld, a former governor of Massachusetts.
  • 1:30 p.m.: Democrat Tom Steyer, a businessman and political donor.
  • 3 p.m.: Democrat Michael Bennet, a U.S. senator from Colorado.
  • 3:45 p.m.: Bernie Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont and an independent seeking the Democratic nomination.
  • 4:30 p.m.: Democrat Bill de Blasio, mayor of New York City. 

Tuesday, Aug. 13

  • 1:30 p.m.: Democrat Pete Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

Saturday, Aug. 17

  • Noon: Democrat Seth Moulton, the U.S. representative for Massachusetts’ 6th Congressional District.

No one is currently scheduled to speak on Monday, Aug. 12; Wednesday through Friday, Aug. 14-16; and Sunday, Aug. 18.

The following candidates have been invited to the Des Moines Register Political Soapbox but have yet to schedule appearances: Democrat Wayne Messam and Republican Donald Trump.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Comments Off on Iowa State Fair Political Soapbox Schedule

JD Scholten v Steve King: Is Iowa’s Fourth District More Progressive Than We Think?

J.D. Scholten has received the endorsement of Democracy for America.  DFA has 14,944 members in Iowa’s Fourth Congressional District, 30,276 in the state of Iowa, and more than one million members nationwide.  It is somewhat surprising that half of DFA’s Iowa membership is in the conservative fourth district. Maybe Iowa’s fourth has more potential for a progressive candidate than conventional wisdom assumes.

J.D. carries forward Howard Dean’s “people-powered campaign” theme.

“Our campaign is proud to earn Democracy for America’s endorsement, a critical step forward in our people-powered campaign to deliver real, positive change for Iowa’s 4th district. By coming together, as Iowans and Americans first, we can build a government and an economy that works for all people — not just those at the top.” — J.D. Scholten

Here we go, folks. This could be interesting.

“Change requires perseverance.”  – Howard Dean

 

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Beto Swears, Joins Warren And Buttiegieg In Holding The Media Accountable

Beto O’Rourke

One step forward for Democracy.

Finally, someone displays the appropriate level of affect when referring to Trump!  Beto O’Rourke apparently has had enough of  the media’s crap and Trump’s crap and didn’t mind saying so, and that is exactly what is called for at this moment in time.

My personal view is that most of the blame for the nation’s current problems lies at the feet of the corporate media who prefer to repeat lies and promote false controversy at the expense of the country because…ratings ($$$).

It is a very big deal that candidates are starting to talk about the complicit media.  This is a taboo subject.  There are no political rewards for doing it.  Howard Dean tried it in 2003 when he told Chris Matthews that one of his first acts, if he were to become president, would be to break up big media, and look what happened to him. They say his campaign was already dead but they made sure Howard Dean stayed dead by broadcasting the famous fake Dean scream over 700 times in just a few days.

Nonetheless, by my count, Beto O’Rourke is the third 2020 Democratic candidate to make a public statement pointing out the role the corporate media plays in the nation’s seemingly unsolvable problems.

Elizabeth Warren refused to do a Fox News town hall. In doing so, she correctly pointed out that Fox News is “propaganda for profit.”

Fox News is a hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racist and conspiracists. It’s designed to turn us against each other, risking life and death consequences, to provide cover for the corruption that’s rotting our government and hollowing out our middle class. – Elizabeth Warren

Steve Almond of WBUR:

“Warren recognizes that  Fox invites Democratic candidates to appear “not to expose Fox viewers to new ideas or policies, but as a corporate ploy to keep advertisers from bailing on their increasingly unhinged propaganda….  Fox pulls in an average of about 3 million viewers, or 1% of our total population, and that core audience happens to be the most ideologically intransigent viewership in America. Its viewers are also among the most misinformed in America.”  Link

Mayor Pete Buttiegieg actually did a Fox News town hall and called out Fox anchors  Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham for their divisive, hateful rhetoric while he was on Fox News doing the town hall.  That’s what I call bold leadership.

It is encouraging to see Beto and the others step up and give them hell.   They deserve it.  The corporatized mass media system in this country is now just a gawdy carnival of parrots and panderers, and worse, a disinformation system that needs to change if we are going to save the democracy and the planet.

Beto’s remarks can be heard on the audio below.   Make a donation to keep his campaign alive.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Beto Swears, Joins Warren And Buttiegieg In Holding The Media Accountable

Local Elected Official Attends Netroots Nation

Netroots Nation has been around for more than a decade. It is an annual convention for progressive activists, originally organized by the Daily Kos community. Previously called YearlyKos, it was later re-named Netroots Nation.  The event draws a few thousand attendees. I have always wanted to attend a Netroots conference, so was pleased to learn that our local Johnson County supervisor, Rod Sullivan, attended this year and wrote about his experiences for The Prairie Progressive.

Published with permission from the Summer 2019 issue of  The Prairie Progressive, Iowa’s oldest progressive newsletter.

Netroots Nation

by Rod Sullivan

Netroots Nation is very left-wing.  Some of it is inspiring, some of it is frustrating, some of it is funny, and some of it is infuriating. Netroots Nation starts the first General Session with a member of a First Nations Tribe reminding everyone that the land upon which they are sitting was stolen from her people. That is basically it. No request, other than to please
acknowledge it. It was very powerful. Of less interest to me was that every large group session began with a couple of minutes of mindfulness. Not my bag.

The conference used completely gender-neutral restrooms. Remember Ally McBeal? It’s like that. I think I was one of many conference-goers who struggled with the etiquette. For
example, should men still use urinals in what used to be a men’s room? Or do you wait until the next stall is open? Many of us recognized that we often do more than just “go to the bathroom” when we go to the bathroom!

This was the largest Netroots Nation conference ever, drawing over 3,600 attendees. They made a point of emphasizing that this was their most diverse conference ever, and it showed. Only 26% of the presenters were non-disabled straight white males. The conference had a definite feeling of female empowerment throughout. I was particularly impressed by Saturday’s lineup of Congresspeople. The intro was by Rep. Barbara Lee,
who opened with “Wakanda Forever!” She noted that she was used to both being and voting alone in Congress. Lee was viciously attacked for her opposition to the Iraq War (she was the only vote against it); reading her words today, everything she predicted
came true!

Lee introduced a panel of Congresswomen Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Talib, Ilhan Omar,  and Deb Haaland to a rousing standing ovation (Haaland is not typically included in “the Squad,” but she is a powerful speaker). The timing here was interesting, as President Trump’s tweets attacking the Squad came the next morning. I admit, I teared up as each of these newer members saluted Lee for her mentorship. Talib said Lee quietly meets  individually with every woman of color every single month. She offers them support that
she herself never received.

The makeup of Netroots Nation breaks down roughly into people from nonprofits (ACLU,  Sierra Club, League of Women Voters, etc.), groups like Act Blue and Move On, labor, political consultants, tech specialists, and journalists. Over the last couple of years, they have made a strong effort to include more local activists. There weren’t many elected
officials, though I spoke to a couple of Congressional campaign staffers who said  candidates are beginning to realize that this is great training for campaign staff.

I came across only two Iowans besides myself. One, JD Schloten, sat on a couple of panels and did a GREAT job! Because this conference is full of political nerds, I became a minor celebrity simply being from Iowa. They all wanted to know which presidential candidates have good staff, who I have met personally, etc.

I mentioned the “techie” aspect of Netroots Nation. In reality, they could just as easily be running two separate conferences. Each breakout session had about ten trainings to choose from. Three were very specific to people with tech knowledge; seven were of more general interest. I focused on labor/economics/poverty in the sessions I attended. Much
of the discussion was a perfect fit for the issues that I work on every day as a County Supervisor. I attended sessions on local labor law, creating your own chapter of the Moral Majority, rural poverty, and the economics of the minimum wage, and I had a great  conversation with the head of the universal basic income movement.

There is a certain amount of stargazing at Netroots. In addition to the elected officials that speak, the place is crawling with minor celebrities. I spoke with Joy Reid from MSNBC, who was very kind and funny. Former Attorney General Eric Holder was around, just
chatting people up. It was wild how nonchalant it all was. Of course, the conference ended with a Presidential Forum. Unfortunately for the other candidates, this was Elizabeth Warren’s crowd. Everything she said was greeted with loud applause, and when she was done, the room emptied. Poor Jay Inslee could not even be heard over the rush to get in
Warren’s selfie line.

My overall impression of Netroots Nation was quite positive. I know this was wrong of me, but I went in expecting to find many of the attendees insufferable. In fact, I am happy to admit I was wrong! Most of the people I met were wonderful. I am definitely interested in giving Netroots Nation another try.

Prairie Dog

The Prairie Progressive is  funded entirely by reader subscription,  available only in hard copy for $12/yr.  Send check to PP, Box 1945, Iowa City 52244.

 

Posted in Blog for Iowa | 1 Comment

Sunday Funnies And A Couple Of Comments

 

 

John Fugelsang has an interesting view on the next election. He would like to see Trump win if only to face the consequences of his reckless economic policies.

Much like George W’s policies, Trump has blown a huge hole in the debt in order to turn huge amounts of money over to his rich buddies. So much like George W’s economy you can expect this one to implode in a couple of years, If Democrats win in 2020, they will get the blame much as Jimmy Carter got blame from Nixon and Ford’s mismanagement of the economy.

 Fugelsang thinks it would be karmic if Trump had to bear the consequences of his own policies.

repubs blow a hole in the deficit

“Trade wars are good, and easy to win.”— Donald Trump

Well maybe not so much there, Bucko. Your trade wars have put our farmers involuntarily on the front lines while you made sure your products and those of your family (Ivanka) were not in the line of fire. While our farmers are facing survival situations, you really don’t care. Your only concern is that you can claim some kind of victory. 

trump is lying

bills passed by dem house 2019

Here is what is bothering me about these really gawdawful debates. We have Democrats throwing bombs at each other trying to score points which the opposition will use against our nominee next year. The strategy for Republicans next year is not to increase vote for their candidate. That may be a very hard task to do.

What their strategy will be is to keep the vote down for Democrats. This has been their strategy for many elections. If you can’t get votes for yourself, then stop your opposition from getting votes. Look for Republicans to mash up scenes from the debates so that it will look like even the Dems won’t support our nominee. That is the goal of negative ads – make it so people don’t want to vote.

Here is a feel good video about a doctor who adds a little something to his work:

https://twitter.com/kharyp/status/1057488207309389824

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2020 election campaign, Blog for Iowa, Budget, Humor | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Sunday Funnies And A Couple Of Comments

Sunday Funday: Background Noise Edition

video 2 minutes:

There will be some background noise during the presidential election next year and most likely also in the House and Senate races also. Behind all the drama of the election will be an underlying problem for the current president – that is, as Robert Mueller stated above – once he is no longer president, his past will catch up to him fast. 

So Dear Leader will not only be running for president, he will be running to stay out of the hoosegow. You think he and his minions won’t break and bend more than a few election laws to keep his rear out of jail? He does that for no real reason everyday now.

BTW – the twitter dreck that Dear Leader pumps out daily is henceforth know as “Donorrhea.”

Another memorable week? Sort of:

  1. What recently dismissed head of the Iowa DHS will bring a lawsuit against Governor Reynolds concerning his termination?
  1. Opposition leader Alexei Navalny was hospitalized because of a possible poisoning in what country Sunday?
  1. Who is, according to his own claims, the “least racist person in the world”?
  1. According to the Russian Embassy in Washington, who has offered Russia help with wildfires now happening in Siberia?
  1. Gilroy, California came into national attention last Sunday when what happened?
  1. An ethanol plant in Northwest Iowa is one of ten ethanol plants that have been temporarily shut down for what reason?
  1. 65 years ago today what grisly discovery was made at an earthen dam outside of Philadelphia, Mississippi?
  1. What is the location at the Iowa State Fair where candidates for political office can give speeches that draw crowds and media coverage?
  1. Markets got very jittery this week in the US as Dear Leader announced another round of tariffs on what country?
  1. Dear Leader accused what House leader being a racist last week?
  1. The Republican exodus from the US House continued this week as what lone black Republican member of the House announce he would not run?
  1. An “America First” campaign speech by Dear Leader in May of 2016 was discovered last week to have been allowed to be edited by what foreign country?
  1. During one of the debates last week, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand gave an inadvertent plug for what household cleaning agent?
  1. Over in Ireland a 15 year old scientist received a prize of $50,000 for discovering a way to remove what from the world’s waters?
  1. A man was caught trying to transport what non-functioning military weapon in his luggage at BWI airport?
  1. The nominee to be the Deputy Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had his nomination slowed last week due to accusations of what?
  1. 12 billion tons of ice melted on what once glacier loaded large island Thursday?
  1. The new US ambassador to the UN is what frequently absent from her post Ambassador to Canada?
  1. Happy 58th birthday to what left-handed president today?
  1. Nancy Pelosi accompanied what the congress member on her return to her ancestor’s country last week?

From Vanity Fair  

Defending Cummings on Thursday, Pelosi told reporters that Trump is projecting his own issues on her Democratic colleague, that, characteristically, he doesn’t know his ass from his elbow when it comes to the situation in Baltimore, and that he should address the matter with Kushner, which of course he won’t. “To see the president demean a great leader like Elijah Cummings shows his own insecurity, and his own lack of understanding about what progress really is,” Pelosi said in the Capitol. She added: “The president…really doesn’t know what he’s talking about. But maybe he could ask his son-in-law, who’s a slumlord.”

Answers:

  1. Jerry Foxhoven
  1. Russia – he leads the opposition against Putin
  1. Dear Leader! His assessment has been questioned.
  1. Dear Leader!
  1. Another mass shooting at the Gilroy Garlic festival
  1. There is an oversupply of ethanol on the market
  1. The bodies three missing civil rights leaders were discovered buried in the dam – Cheney, Goodwin and Schwerner
  1. The Des Moines Register Soap Box – it will be getting a workout in the next couple of weeks
  1. China
  1. Elijah Cummings (seriously) 
  1. Will Hurd of Texas
  1. Saudi Arabia
  1. Clorox – when she stated that her first act as president would be to Clorox the Oval Office
  1. Micro-plastics.  
  1. A rocket launcher
  1. Sexual misconduct
  1. Greenland – the temperature was 22 degrees celsius Thursday
  1. Kelly Knight Craft (qualifications: she’s rich)
  1. Barack Obama
  1. Ilhan Omar on her visit to Ghana. The trip commemorated 400 years since Africans were taken into slavery in the Americas.

Look who’s here: It’s Randy Rainbow! (5 minutes)

 

Posted in #trumpresistance, Blog for Iowa, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Background Noise Edition

What Is A Conservative, What Is A Liberal?

I found the treatise on being liberal posted below on democraticunderground the other day. Apparently it is making the rounds on facebook and other social media. So maybe you have read it already. As the unknown author notes in his lead in not every liberal believes the same thing, but probably generally could agree with much of his list.

This did make me wonder what passes for ‘conservative’ these days. “Conservative” was once a word for someone who wants slow change, wants to stay with the status quo, looks for ways to save money and environment. Comparing actions of people currently identified as “conservative” would certainly indicate that such definition is way out os date.

The Conservative party has not worked to maintain the status quo since the so called Reagan Revolution. They have been pushing for radical change in all sectors of society. They have pushed for wealth transfer from the poor to the very richest and have enacted laws to do just that. That is easily demonstrable by the huge rise in wealth inequality in this country over the past 40 years. 

Conservatives once put huge stock in maintaining family and in personal integrity. Now we see a party that seems to have sex scandals frequently – we see this in Iowa’s current governance – and has elected a man whose life is an absolute mockery of these values from constantly cheating on his wives to cheating his business partners and customers to lying at almost everything he talks about.

One of the very cornerstones of conservative values is the family and children and their proper rearing. Yet the Conservative party of today throws children less than a year old into cages as their families attempt to escape terror abroad. The Conservative party pushes laws that take away a woman’s ability to control their own body and force birth on those who are often least able to care for a child. Then they take away any societal help that comes in the form of food aid or monetary help. 

Finally for this segment, conservatives were once most easily identified by their very tight monetary policies. Yet they are backing a president whose policies are totally reckless when it comes to tariffs and trade. The once vaunted monetary hawks now blow holes in our budget to the tune of $1.5Trillion a year while handing huge gifts of public money to corporate welfare queens.

So is this what a conservative is today? Or do we need a new word to truly describe what has become of a once Conservative party?

As for liberals this is the article from democraticunderground and not a statement of anyone’s beliefs at BFIA:

Something good to pass along

This is a long read, but if you care about why I (or those that think similarly) feel the way I do, then take a moment to read: 

Yes….. 

I’m getting a little tired of being told what I believe and what I stand for. 

I’m a liberal, but that doesn’t mean what a lot of you apparently think it does. Let’s break it down, shall we? Spoiler alert: Not every liberal is the same, though the majority of liberals I know think along roughly these same lines: 

1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. A country cannot call itself civilized when its children, disabled, sick, and elderly are neglected. Period. 

2. I believe healthcare is a right, not a privilege. Somehow that’s interpreted as “I believe Obamacare is the end-all, be-all.” This is not the case. I’m fully aware that the ACA has problems, that a national healthcare system would require everyone to chip in, and that it’s impossible to create one that is devoid of flaws, but I have yet to hear an argument against it that makes “let people die because they can’t afford healthcare” a better alternative. I believe healthcare should be far cheaper than it is, and that everyone should have access to it. And no, I’m not opposed to paying higher taxes in the name of making that happen. 

3. I believe education should be affordable and accessible to everyone. It doesn’t necessarily have to be free (though it works in other countries so I’m mystified as to why it can’t work in the US), but at the end of the day, there is no excuse for students graduating college saddled with five- or six-figure debt. 

4. I don’t believe your money should be taken from you and given to people who don’t want to work. I have literally never encountered anyone who believes this. Ever. I just have a massive moral problem with a society where a handful of people can possess the majority of the wealth while there are people literally starving to death, freezing to death, or dying because they can’t afford to go to the doctor. Fair wages, lower housing costs, universal healthcare, affordable education, and the wealthy actually paying their share would go a long way toward alleviating this. Somehow believing that makes me a communist. 

5. I don’t throw around “I’m willing to pay higher taxes” lightly. If I’m suggesting something that involves paying more, well, it’s because I’m fine with paying my share as long as it’s actually going to something besides lining corporate pockets or bombing other countries while Americans die without healthcare. 

6. I believe companies should be required to pay their employees a decent, livable wage. Somehow this is always interpreted as me wanting burger flippers to be able to afford a penthouse apartment and a Mercedes. What it actually means is that no one should have to work three full-time jobs just to keep their head above water. Restaurant servers should not have to rely on tips, multibillion-dollar companies should not have employees on food stamps, workers shouldn’t have to work themselves into the ground just to barely make ends meet, and minimum wage should be enough for someone to work 40 hours and live. 

7. I am not anti-Christian. I have no desire to stop Christians from being Christians, to close churches, to ban the Bible, to forbid prayer in school, etc. (BTW, prayer in school is NOT illegal; *compulsory* prayer in school is – and should be – illegal). All I ask is that Christians recognize *my* right to live according to *my* beliefs. When I get pissed off that a politician is trying to legislate Scripture into law, I’m not “offended by Christianity” — I’m offended that you’re trying to force me to live by your religion’s rules. You know how you get really upset at the thought of Muslims imposing Sharia law on you? That’s how I feel about Christians trying to impose biblical law on me. Be a Christian. Do your thing. Just don’t force it on me or mine. 

8. I don’t believe LGBT people should have more rights than you. I just believe they should have the *same* rights as you. 

9. I don’t believe illegal immigrants should come to America and have the world at their feet, especially since THIS ISN’T WHAT THEY DO (spoiler: undocumented immigrants are ineligible for all those programs they’re supposed to be abusing, and if they’re “stealing” your job it’s because your employer is hiring illegally). I’m not opposed to deporting people who are here illegally, but I believe there are far more humane ways to handle undocumented immigration than our current practices (i.e., detaining children, splitting up families, ending DACA, etc). 

10. I don’t believe the government should regulate everything, but since greed is such a driving force in our country, we NEED regulations to prevent cut corners, environmental destruction, tainted food/water, unsafe materials in consumable goods or medical equipment, etc. It’s not that I want the government’s hands in everything — I just don’t trust people trying to make money to ensure that their products/practices/etc. are actually SAFE. Is the government devoid of shadiness? Of course not. But with those regulations in place, consumers have recourse if they’re harmed and companies are liable for medical bills, environmental cleanup, etc. Just kind of seems like common sense when the alternative to government regulation is letting companies bring their bottom line into the equation. 

11. I believe our current administration is fascist. Not because I dislike them or because I can’t get over an election, but because I’ve spent too many years reading and learning about the Third Reich to miss the similarities. Not because any administration I dislike must be Nazis, but because things are actually mirroring authoritarian and fascist regimes of the past. 

12. I believe the systemic racism and misogyny in our society is much worse than many people think, and desperately needs to be addressed. Which means those with privilege — white, straight, male, economic, etc. — need to start listening, even if you don’t like what you’re hearing, so we can start dismantling everything that’s causing people to be marginalized. 

13. I am not interested in coming after your blessed guns, nor is anyone serving in government. What I am interested in is sensible policies, that just MIGHT save one person’s, perhaps a toddler’s, life by the hand of someone who should not have a gun. (Got another opinion? Put it on your page, not mine). 

14. I believe in so-called political correctness. I prefer to think it’s social politeness. If I call you Chuck and you say you prefer to be called Charles I’ll call you Charles. It’s the polite thing to do. Not because everyone is a delicate snowflake, but because as Maya Angelou put it, when we know better, we do better. When someone tells you that a term or phrase is more accurate/less hurtful than the one you’re using, you now know better. So why not do better? How does it hurt you to NOT hurt another person? 

15. I believe in funding sustainable energy, including offering education to people currently working in coal or oil so they can change jobs. There are too many sustainable options available for us to continue with coal and oil. Sorry, billionaires. Maybe try investing in something else. 

16. I believe that women should not be treated as a separate class of human. They should be paid the same as men who do the same work, should have the same rights as men including decisions about their own bodies, and should be free from abuse. Why on earth shouldn’t they be?

Posted in #trumpresistance | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Dent In Citizens United From A Montana Judge

Some good news via the Los Angeles Times Thursday morning.   

Judge overturns IRS rule that shielded political donors’ identities

“A federal judge in Montana overturned an Internal Revenue Service rule that allowed many political nonprofit groups to keep their donor lists private.

The ruling upends a change the IRS made last year that permitted so-called Section 501(c)4 groups, known as “social welfare” organizations, to keep their donor lists private. A federal judge said the IRS didn’t follow proper procedure in writing the rule and needs to let the public weigh in on the change before altering the tax code.

“Then, and only then, may the IRS act on a fully informed basis when making potentially significant changes to federal tax law,” U.S. District Judge Brian Morris said in the opinion Tuesday evening.

<< snip >>

“Not only did the IRS try to make it easier for dark money groups to hide their funding sources, it did so behind closed doors,” Grewal said in a statement.

The ruling is a blow to Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin, who said the rule protected donor privacy because the IRS could enforce tax laws without that information. Democrats had criticized the agency’s move, saying it opened up the possibility for foreign interests to influence elections.”

Up until now, donors have been able to hide their sometimes rather nefarious political action behind an IRS rule that hid their names from the public. This spits in the face of everything that having an open democracy stands for. Everyone  is most certainly allowed to join whatever political group they want, but there should be no secrecy. 

Donations for political purposes, since they affect the public’s business should be made public. The 501(c)4 provisions for “social welfare” groups that are in reality political issue organizations is yet another example of the Republican disdain for real democracy in this country. Hiding the names of donors to these issue groups ranks right in with voter suppression, Russian interference, gerrymandering and possible voting machine hacking.

We really need to know who is donating to these issue organizations. Who donates will help to expose who the people who are pushing the issue and what the real purpose behind the issue group is. Election rules state that foreign money is not supposed to be involved in our elections. With the names of donors to issue oriented groups unavailable, foreign donors could easily be hidden behind the curtain of secrecy.

There was much suspicion that money from Russia was funneled to the NRA over the past 3 years or so, but without access to donor records that would be hard to prove. Corporations and CEOs of major companies use this provision to shield their companies from negative publicity by hiding behind this IRS provision. If a business or company officer is ashamed to be outed as a contributor to an issue oriented group because of possible negative publicity, you would have to wonder why they would contribute to such a group.

“We, the People” as intoned in the preamble to the constitution should be able to see who is pushing what issue, so we can figure out why. Simply stated, secrecy is the enemy of democracies and the friend of tyrants.

As the LA Times stated in an editorial after Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin created the rule slightly over a year ago:  

But while this week’s policy change may not affect what the public may learn about political spending by so-called social welfare groups, it could make it more difficult for the government to police laws against spending by foreigners on U.S. elections. Fred Wertheimer, president of the campaign reform group Democracy 21, warned that, with the end of the reporting requirement, “there is no way to determine if a 501(c)(4) advocacy group that is spending money to influence federal elections is taking that money from Russia, from Russian agents, from China or from any other foreign interest.”

Once again we see a Republican Party that is bent on winning elections by cheating and hoodwinking the public. Ads have already started running with a pack of lies about Medicare For All. They were running during the Democratic debates last week. According to the Hill:  

Partnership for America’s Health Care Future, which is funded by influential health care groups like PhRMA, the American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association, will air the ads Tuesday and Wednesday nights as part of a six-figure television and digital campaign targeting the proposal and other expansions of Medicare.

I have to wonder as should we all if that is a comprehensive list of donors? Are there any foreigners among the donors? 

Get ready for a long couple years of lies, misleads and omissions as money tries to fool us into not doing what is good for the whole.

Expect the Montana ruling to be appealed. This will be where we see in Moscow Mitch’s strategy of refusing to allow Obama to appoint judges and then changing rules to fill the benches with Trump appointees pays off. My bet is it will and within a short space of time we will once more be denied the ability to find out where the money behind the issue ads comes from.

Thank you, Moscow Mitch for destroying democracy.

Posted in #trumpresistance, Citizens United | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Dent In Citizens United From A Montana Judge

When To Swallow The Red Pill

RAGBRAI riders stopped at the Norwalk Christian Church for pie. Photo Credit – Trish Nelson

Trish Nelson will be returning to the editor’s desk next week.

Among things she did while on hiatus was ride a couple days of RAGBRAI, posting this photograph of pies behind empty church pews. The image says something more although I’m at a loss to put words to it. It can speak for itself.

Time for me to go on hiatus for a while as well.

Tomorrow I return to the apple orchard where I work in the sales barn doing whatever is needed for the season. If I’m lucky, I’ll have great conversations with some of the thousands of guests who show up on a weekend. If I’m extra lucky, those conversations will be about apples, gardening and farming.

We political activists need to do our best work to elect a replacement for Dave Loebsack in the Second Congressional District and a U.S. Senator to make Joni Ernst a one-term senator. We also need to retain the hard-won seats of Cindy Axne in the third district and Abby Finkenauer in the first. If we have a candidate in the fourth district, there’s work to be done there as well. Those campaigns will have to wait until after the presidential preference in February, because a person can land only one plane at a time. I favor Rita Hart in the second district and Theresa Greenfield for U.S. Senate. There are no clinkers among those running in the primary.

As far as the Iowa caucus goes, I’m in the same boat as a lot of readers. I want to pick a candidate for president to work with after Labor Day. If I can’t decide which one by then, I may go to caucus uncommitted and join a group that needs one more person to be viable.

I expect to run our precinct caucus (because of a lack of volunteers) and don’t want to get into the unseemly discussions we had during the vote count in 2008. Being uncommitted would be a positive in that regard.

Democrats can’t afford to have winners and losers this cycle, so the pre-caucus dynamic is different from 2008 when there were 8-10 candidates for president and everyone worked hard for their guy or gal to be the one. The only thing that remains the same this cycle is Mike Gravel is running again (Update: The afternoon of the day this was posted, Gravel suspended his presidential campaign).

Someone asked me who were my top three potential presidential candidates. I had to think, but came up with this answer:

Anyone other than Biden, Sanders, Warren and Harris needs a breakthrough by Labor Day (maybe Thanksgiving) to ouster these four poll leaders. Polls and second choices will drive the presidential preference Feb. 3.

If not this week, then soon, the less than one percenters will hopefully have made their point and gracefully exited the race to work on other Democratic priorities. I’m very sorry Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is in this group. She couldn’t get over the Franken blow back among Democrats I know and lost important donors. She is uncompromising on women’s rights.

Look at it this way. Once I figure out what/who I’m supporting I’ll swallow the red pill and follow the rabbit hole where it leads. With the primary in June, there’s plenty of time to work on Rita Hart and Theresa Greenfield after caucus.

Or look at it another way. If Warren had run in 2016, I would have worked hard to make her the nominee. I’m satisfied she’s not too old today. There’s no one else left in the top 4 besides Kamala Harris. I’m less than confident a woman can get elected in 2020. I don’t like most of the men.

So there’s my indecision. If I can’t decide by Labor Day I may not declare and throw my one preference to which ever group could be viable with it, except maybe Sanders.

The most important endgame is coming together once we have a nominee. Keeping the red pill in a waterproof vial for now.

Hope readers enjoy the rest of summer. Thanks for the clicks during the last five weeks.

Posted in 2020 election campaign | Tagged , | Comments Off on When To Swallow The Red Pill