Farewell To #Nerdland

mhpI knew Melissa Harris-Perry’s show would not be on much longer. It was too high quality for TV, too substantive, too intelligent. She left when they tried to do the same thing to her that they are doing elsewhere on MSNBC.  And I’m with her.

The rest of the MSNBC so-called liberal pundits should do the same.  Where once their programs added something of value to the national conversation, now the hosts are apparently required to stick mainly with corporate narrative talking points.  In my view MSNBC has gone not necessarily from liberal to right-wingy, but from excellent to dull; it hurts to watch most of the time.

Melissa is showing bravery and integrity and she is right to tell the truth to the public about what happened. Her show was the last program on cable of real substance where viewers could actually learn not just “both sides” of the issues  (as if there are always only 2 points to be made), but where complex layers of issues were examined. She and her show will be deeply missed. Thank you, Melissa,  for your service.

This is an email to her staff, informing them of her decision.

Dearest Nerds,

As you know by now, my name appears on the weekend schedule for MSNBC programming from South Carolina this Saturday and Sunday. I appreciate that many of you responded to this development with relief and enthusiasm. To know that you have missed working with me even a fraction of how much I’ve missed working with all of you is deeply moving. However, as of this morning, I do not have any intention of hosting this weekend. Because this is a decision that affects all of you, I wanted to take a moment to explain my reasoning.

Some unknown decision-maker, presumably Andy Lack or Phil Griffin, has added my name to this spreadsheet, but nothing has changed in the posture of the MSNBC leadership team toward me or toward our show. Putting me on air seems to be a decision being made solely to save face because there is a growing chorus of questions from our viewers about my notable absence from MSNBC coverage. Social media has noted the dramatic change in editorial tone and racial composition of MSNBC’s on-air coverage. In addition, Dylan Byers of CNN has made repeated inquiries with MSNBC’s leadership and with me about the show and what appears to be its cancellation. I have not responded to reporters or social media inquiries. However, I am not willing to appear on air in order to quell concerns about the disappearance of our show and our voice.

Here is the reality: our show was taken — without comment or discussion or notice — in the midst of an election season. After four years of building an audience, developing a brand, and developing trust with our viewers, we were effectively and utterly silenced. Now, MSNBC would like me to appear for four inconsequential hours to read news that they deem relevant without returning to our team any of the editorial control and authority that makes MHP Show distinctive.

The purpose of this decision seems to be to provide cover for MSNBC, not to provide voice for MHP Show. I will not be used as a tool for their purposes. I am not a token, mammy, or little brown bobble head. I am not owned by Lack, Griffin, or MSNBC. I love our show. I want it back. I have wept more tears than I can count and I find this deeply painful, but I don’t want back on air at any cost. I am only willing to return when that return happens under certain terms.

Undoubtedly, television nurtures the egos of those of us who find ourselves in front of bright lights and big cameras. I am sure ego is informing my own pain in this moment, but there is a level of professional decency, respect, and communication that has been denied this show for years. And the utter insulting absurdity of the past few weeks exceeds anything I can countenance.

I have stayed in the same hotels where MSNBC has been broadcasting in Iowa, in New Hampshire, and in South Carolina, yet I have been shut out from coverage. I have a PhD in political science and have taught American voting and elections at some of the nation’s top universities for nearly two decades, yet I have been deemed less worthy to weigh in than relative novices and certified liars. I have hosted a weekly program on this network for four years and contributed to election coverage on this network for nearly eight years, but no one on the third floor has even returned an email, called me, or initiated or responded to any communication of any kind from me for nearly a month. It is profoundly hurtful to realize that I work for people who find my considerable expertise and editorial judgment valueless to the coverage they are creating.

While MSNBC may believe that I am worthless, I know better. I know who I am. I know why MHP Show is unique and valuable. I will not sell short myself or this show. I am not hungry for empty airtime. I care only about substantive, meaningful, and autonomous work. When we can do that, I will return — not a moment earlier. I am deeply sorry for the ways that this decision makes life harder for all of you. You mean more to me than you can imagine.

Yours always,

Melissa

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Farewell To #Nerdland

Republican Icon Steve King May Be Primaried

doubt he cares much

doubt he cares much

Apparently stepped on some monied toes.

Tuesday morning started with an interesting blurb in the news. State Senator Rick Bertrand of Sioux City publicly acknowledged that he was considering a run against Congressman For Life and More Steve King. What a blasphemy. King is the face of GOP politics in Iowa. Hearing he was getting a challenge certainly piqued some curiosity. For one thing it is quite late in the game for an announcement like this. The deadline for filing papers to run for congress is March 18th, less than a month away. Usually runs like this do not appear to be spur of the moment.

Even Steve King himself seemed to be mystified.

King today said he doesn’t know why Bertrand might be “motivated” to challenge him.

“I don’t remember Rick ever contacting me with any issue that he was concerned about,” King told KSCJ Radio.

The radio story did nothing to illuminate the murkiness. However illumination did come the next morning from the folks at dailykos.com. This story in their Morning Digest sated our curiosity on motivation. As in so much in politics any more it is Follow The Money, Follow The Money, Follow The Money:

“IA-04: Rep. Steve King is best known in DC for his many stupid and offensive quotes. His career can perhaps be best epitomized with his declaration that, for every child of an undocumented immigrant “who’s a valedictorian, there’s another 100 out there who weigh 130 pounds and they’ve got calves the size of cantaloupes because they’re hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert.” But he’s probably Iowa’s most powerful social conservative, and prominent local business conservatives have been comfortable letting King shoot his mouth off. But King may have finally touched the third rail of Hawkeye State politics and earned himself a primary challenge.

King is a longtime supporter of ethanol, a fuel that’s made up of a ton of Iowa corn. But Ted Cruz, who probably owes King his victory in the state’s presidential caucus, has been reluctant to promote pro-ethanol laws like the Renewable Fuel Standard. Ethanol lobbyist Eric Branstad, the son of Gov. and Cruz hater-in-chief Terry Branstad, has made it no secret that he’s furious at King for backing Cruz, and the ethanol industry and GOP operative Nick Ryan have been reportedly trying to recruit a primary challenger for King. And they may have finally found their man: State Sen. Rick Bertrand said over the weekend that he’s “strongly, strongly considering” running against King. The filing deadline is March 18, so if Bertrand wants to run, he’ll need to decide soon.

If Bertrand gets in, it’s not going to be easy for him to beat King. Social conservative voters are a powerful force in western Iowa GOP politics, and it’s very tough to see their praetor losing. And as the Iowa Starting Line points out, Cruz did well in the 4th District at the beginning of the month, so King’s support for him is hardly an automatic scarlet letter with voters. But the ethanol industry’s support could give Bertrand access to money. King only had $119,000 in the bank at the end of December, so Bertrand could definitely outspend him. Romney won this seat 53-45 and King turned back well-funded Democratic foes, and it doesn’t look like Team Blue will have a strong candidate who can capitalize on any GOP chaos.

Apparently there are lines even Steve King can’t cross. Don’t piss with somebody else’s big buck gig. Comprende? For Steve King’s benefit, that means Understand?

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Branstad, Steve King | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Guns Don’t Shoot People, People Shoot People


They just use guns to do the shooting with.

So the Iowa House says let’s give guns to kids.

Last Sunday morning we awoke to news of yet another mass murder in the United States. Kalamazoo, Michigan 6 killed many injured.

Wednesday morning we awoke to news that the Iowa House had overwhelmingly passed five pro gun measures including one that allows children access to guns. They did not pass any laws to make guns safer, such as biometrics recognition access before shooting a gun. They did pass a law to allow silencers on guns. That way the neighbors won’t get scared by the noise of other neighbors being shot. These will be especially handy in theaters.

Thursday evening we got news of yet another mass murder in Kansas. At least four were killed and up to 30 injured.

Anyone else see a connection? Mass murders in the US are now so common they barely rate a mention in the news. This year is less than 60 days old and there have already been 33 mass murders in the US as I write this. Not only is there the needless and horrible end to some lives, there are also the wrecked bodies of those who survived but are damaged for life. Even if a person were only grazed the psychological fear that they will carry for the rest of their lives will be massive.

And for each victim, dead or alive, there is huge network of family, friends, business associates, neighbors and acquaintances whose life will be deeply altered. Dad is no longer in the house and his income and love can’t be replaced; Mom is dead and there are young children at home; we can go on for hours on how each of the victim’s tragedy will affect so many others.

I doubt there is a person in this state whose life has not been touched in some way by gun violence, be it a relative, a neighbor, a classmate, a friend or acquaintance.

But there is money to be made. Representative Matt Windschitl, one of the major pushers for more lax gun laws, sells guns and these laws may pump business up a bit.

Thank goodness we still have some sane legislators.

Posted in gun control, Iowa legislature 2016 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Guns Don’t Shoot People, People Shoot People

Sunday Funday: And The Winner Is Edition

can you beat this guy?

can you beat this guy?

In the tiff between the Pope and Donald Trump:

Just a reminder how this little tiff went down: The Pope during his visit to Mexico mentions in a speech that that it would be immoral and unchristian to build a wall between Mexico and the United States. For some reason leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump takes umbrage at this statement. Trump then makes a statement of his own. He lets it be known that if ISIS attacks the Vatican when he is president he may not be in any hurry to send help to the Vatican. Trump claims that attacking the Vatican is high on ISIS’ to do list. Besides, says Trump, doesn’t the Vatican have a wall around it.

Now for the comment that really sums this tiff up from John Fugelsang (as heard on the Thom Hartmann Show) “Thus we have his Holiness versus his assholiness.” Hard to beat Fugelsang or Andy Borowitz for some classic snark.

Were you paying attention last week?

1) The major controversy around tonight’s Oscars are the lack of nominations for who?

2) As the first 2 months of the year come to a close the US has had how many mass murders already?

3) Visiting in Mexico, Pope Francis said what was ok to use since the zika virus can cause such horrible problems?

4) The Confederate battle emblem will remain a part of what state’s flag, since their legislature failed to act in time to have it removed last week?

5) The mass murderer in Kalamazoo, Michigan was working at what job while committing the murders?

6) March 4, 1933 was the last time what major ceremony took place on March 4th?

7) At a basketball game between Perry and Dallas Center Grimes what word did the DCG students use as a racial slur against Perry players?

8) What Iowa Republican icon congressman has been threatened with a possible primary opponent this year?

9) President Obama once more announced his intent to close what last week?

10) Looking for a job with lots of travel, maybe? More than 18,000 applied for what training last year smashing all previous records?

11) Ted Cruz’s communication direct had to resign last week after he admitted he doctored a video to make it seem that Marco Rubio said what?

12) The legal battle heated up between Apple and the FBI concerning Apple’s refusal to do what?

13) The White House stunned some folks when it was leaked that who was under consideration to replace Antonin Scalia on the SCOTUS?

14) The Catholic archbishop of St. Louis reminded folks not to buy what as the organization that sells them supports LGBTQ rights?

15) The Senate Judiciary Committee officially announced it would not do what last week?

16) British Prime Minister David Cameron announced Britain would vote on June 23rd on what issue?

17) $130 million was blown in the failed attempt to make who president during the past year?

18) What two Republican senators placed a hold on a bill for aid for Flint, Michigan to help in their water crisis.

19) What MSNBC host walked off her show following multiple disputes with MSNBC brass over policy during the presidential campaign?

20) Donald Trump picked endorsements from what two eastern governors last week?

Last week was a busy week for the old quizmaster. Getting hard to keep up anymore.

Answers:

1) minority actors.

2) 33 as this is written but may be higher by the time it is posted.

3) contraception

4) Mississippi. It is the only one in the US left like that.

5) Driving for Uber

6) Presidential inauguration

7) “Trump” It was a slur because Perry HS is 48% minority, mostly Latino and Trump has made deporting Latinos from the US an issue this year.

8) Steve King

9) Guantanamo prison

10) astronaut training. Just people looking for free ride on the government

11) that Rubio didn’t really like the bible much. Rubio had actually said “all there answers were in the bible.”

12) unlock the encryption of the San Bernardino mass murderer.

13) Nevada Republican Governor Brian Sandoval

14) Girl Scouts

15) hold any hearings for a nominee to replace Scalia on SCOTUS

16) Britain leaving the EU (aka Brexit)

17) Jeb!

18) Ted Cruz (Texas) and Mike Lee (Utah)

19) Melissa Harris Perry. Here is a link to an email she sent her staff

20) Chris Christie (NJ) and Paul LePage (Maine). These were the first “establishment” endorsements for Trump.

We will now be entering March, the end of sane time and the High Holy Days of basketball.

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: And The Winner Is Edition

Should I Contribute to IPR?

ipr_mug

Last week I received a letter in the mail from Iowa Public Radio asking for a donation. It has caused me to do some deep reflection on what media means to me and my family. Which should be supported and how much if at all. These are some of the thoughts that have been rolling in my mind and are not meant to be any sort of a precise history of NPR or IPR. Cloudy ruminations, that is all

I have been a listener to public radio since the early 1970s. I am not even sure when the WSUI became part of the National Public Radio network. Surely it was sometime around then. I had been an occasional listener to WSUI previously. We used to listen to Saturday morning comedy shows, occasional lectures and debates and believe it or not the best broadcast of Hawkeye football games. So when they moved over to NPR, I probably turned the radio on expecting one show and was pleasantly surprised.

I was raised with a radio in my ear and still have a radio on almost constantly day and night. In the early 70s NPR was a delicious change from commercial radio which was mostly crap and still is. Intelligent and thorough with an emphasis on truth. Stories were truly in depth and had a broad range. In an era before the internet this was one of the best places to keep up with what was going on and one of the few places to hear different views.
‘
But that was then and this is now. Where once NPR was cutting edge these days they have been neutered. Where once stories were delved into deeply, today many stories are only given a neutered cursory mention. Of course in recent years there have been many other sources for news and information have sprung up. NPR more than held its own against cable news. Actually, NPR was the voice of sanity in the tower of babble that was and is cable news.

Sometime in the 1990s things changed dramatically. Where once public radio was allowed to do its own thing in pursuit of truth, in the 90s public radio became yet another pawn in the political wars fostered by Republicans looking to control any and all messages with little concern for truth. At the same time what was once a wonderfully diverse and I believe responsive set of public radio stations in Iowa began a process of shedding their individual identities to become a less responsive group called Iowa Public Radio.

The move to IPR was somewhat understandable. Republican wars on money for endeavors like public radio caused funding to be less stable and reliable. So like many companies, similar work within an organization was centralized thus cutting budgets. Sadly, much of the local flavor was lost in the process. Slowly the debates and lectures disappeared.

Along with budget cuts from Republican congresses came threats of total cutoff of funds. I can’t honestly say for sure that NPR was intimidated, but I could notice a change in the way stories were presented. The “he said, she said” type of stories that were the staple of cable news began to appear more frequently on NPR. There was less emphasis on drilling down and much more emphasis on “hearing both sides.” NPR had and still has a patina of ferreting out the truth. Thus when opinions that had once been thought extreme started to air on NPR it helped make the more extreme acceptable because NPR (with its reputation for truth) carried it.

I have a memory that may be wrong but somehow it is implanted in my brain. Driving to work one morning the news on NPR announced that Bob Edwards was leaving Morning Edition. Edwards had birthed Morning Edition. He was a newsman who could get to the very core of an issue and expose hypocrisy in just a couple of well fought out questions. Edwards had been there just short of 25 years. His loss would be huge. But there must have been good reason for NPR to make such a move.

Not sure of all the details, but from what I can remember Bob Edwards had stepped on some important toes during his interviews. He was replaced by Steve Innskeep. For me this was like trading in the cadillac to get a pinto. Innskeep was then and is now cheerful and bubbly. Deep he is not.

From that point there seems to have been a continuous slow downward spiral. Seems that a couple of NPR chairs have stepped down under pressure from some in congress over the past many years. With each change like this NPR seems to be more neutered and their news and stories become more bland. Often their stories seem to be incomplete, as if there are certain lines they can’t cross.

Let me say again if I haven’t made this clear, these are my thoughts on donating to NPR and not meant to be a precise history. Just my thoughts.

So now I have gone to having a radio in every room tuned to NPR to one in the bathroom and the kitchen. I have radio on in whatever room I am in so when in the kitchen preparing food the radio is on. But where once I would turn the sound up so I could hear it throughout the house, I now turn it off when I am done. Ten to fifteen minutes a pop, not hours on end like it used to be. Often I turn the computer on and listen to that instead. NPR and IPR are no longer the go to media. They now sit somewhere around fifth or sixth choice on the computer. They are still the top choice, really the only choice, on terrestrial radio, but honestly sometimes I just leave it off anymore.

Another thing that is greatly bothersome is the penchant to go to right wing sources as commentators. In the last month they have had experts such as Mike Gallagher and Erik Erikson as commentators. In my experience these are two of America’s most vile right wingers. They were given the patina of NPR approval. The Heritage Foundation is often gleaned for an expert on many subjects with only a description of “think tank” to describe Heritage. Douglas Holtz-Eakin is often called on for economic commentary. He was John McCain’s economic advisor. The NPR political commentator is Fox News Contributor Mara Liaison.

In contrast I can’t remember hearing any voices from the left commenting lately. Paul Krugman? Joe Stiglitz? Thom Hartmann? Since I seldom listen for long periods anymore maybe I have missed them. But I often start arguing with my radio if I listen too long these days. Often you can hear me say “tell the rest of the story,” as I did when a Chuck Grassley clip was played without comment where he stated that congress never considered a SCOTUS nominee for a lame duck president.

Lots of people want my money these days. I doubt very much that the paltry amount I can afford now would hold any sway with IPR. I do feel a little guilty, sort of like the feelings one has for an ex-spouse or girlfriend/boyfriend. You wish them well, maybe don’t mind seeing them now and then. But they seem to be headed in a different direction than when we were young and happy. The ways of the world have changed ouyr mutual outlooks and, well, I just can’t support it when others are in much more need.

Posted in Media Reform | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Should I Contribute to IPR?

Iowa, You Can Fire Chuck Grassley!

Makes $3,000+ a week. Refuses to do job

Makes $3,000+ a week. Refuses to do job

Yes you can. Grassley says no to doing the work assigned him by the constitution. He gets paid a hell of a lot of money for that. He has a big staff, a huge office plus offices around the state that we pay for. Since his last election, despite the good pay and incredibly excellent benefits, Chuck Grassley has refused to do his job.

The past couple of years have been almost landmark in how to dis your boss (us) and stay employed. Grassley signs a letter that interferes in negotiations with Iran. Is it treason? You decide, but it is certainly a kick in the face for our country.

Then as chair of the Judiciary Committee, Grassley has pretty much stopped appointing judges to the federal bench. This is causing a crisis in our judicial system. Why? Just to obstruct the President, that is all. Thwarting the constitution bust to obstruct the president.

Grassley also jumped on the big train to tear down Hillary Clinton. Apparently Ms. Clinton hasn’t given Grassley the proper respect so for a while he held up all appointments to the State Department. Grassley must not have realized Ms. Clinton was no longer Secretary of State. This little snit on Grassley’s part almost caused major problems for the US at the time of the terrorist attacks in Paris. Leaders in other countries tried to deal with our embassies at that time only to find many way understaffed to deal with a crisis.

Now we come to the death of a Supreme Court Justice. The founders anticipated that men would become feeble and die, so they made provisions for replacement of these men. How to do this is in the constitution. Grassley as a senator refuses to do his job.

When an elected public official refuses to do their job, we have an obligation to remove that official. It is too bad that there isn’t some provision for withholding pay and benefits (including those free flights home) until said official decides it is in his interest to do his job. Makes one also wonder why he needs a staff.

Ultimately we do have the power, if we decide to use it. We should be sick and tired of Grassley’s games by now. At this point he is laughing at us and our inability to remove him from office. We are the ones who must stand up and tell him that he represents us and not his party.

Grassley has represented his party and not represented Iowa for decades. Now that his party is only the party of not just NO but HELL NO (to quote John Boehner) it is time to tell Chuck “you’re FIRED!” His refusal to represent us while only representing his party is doing us and the country harm. The game is over, Chuck.

Grassley’ contact form is here:

Grassley’s offices are:

Cedar Rapids
111 7th Avenue SE, Box 13
Suite 6800
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401
(319) 363-6832
Fax: (319) 363-7179

Council Bluffs

307 Federal Building
8 South 6th Street
Council Bluffs, IA 51501
(712) 322-7103
Fax: (712) 322-7196

Davenport
201 West 2nd Street
Suite 720
Davenport, IA 52801
(563) 322-4331
Fax: (563) 322-8552

Des Moines
721 Federal Building
210 Walnut Street
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 288-1145
Fax: (515) 288-5097

Sioux City
120 Federal Building
320 6th Street
Sioux City, IA 51101
(712) 233-1860
Fax: (712) 233-1634

Waterloo

210 Waterloo Building
531 Commercial Street
Waterloo, IA 50701
(319) 232-6657
Fax: (319) 232-9965

Washington, D.C.
135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-3744
Fax: (202) 224-6020

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Charles Grassley, President Obama, Republican hypocrisy, Republican Obstruction, Republicn Policy | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Dave Loebsack Works Across The Aisle For Rural Broadband Development

Dave Loebsack IA02

Dave Loebsack IA02

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Dave Loebsack released the following statement today after his bipartisan amendment to H.R. 4596, the Small Business Broadband Deployment Act, was unanimously passed by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. This amendment, which Loebsack introduced with the chairman of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, Greg Walden (R-OR), extends the FCC’s exemption from its enhanced transparency rules for small Internet service providers (ISPs) for 5 years.

When originally introduced, H.R. 4596 sought to exempt ISPs with 500,000 or fewer subscribers or 1,500 employees. While Democrats were initially opposed to this proposal, Loebsack worked closely with both Republicans and Democrats on the committee to craft this smaller, short-term exemption, which allows small ISPs to focus their resources on broadband deployment, while giving them the time they need to comply with the FCC’s new rules.

“Iowa has over 100 small Internet service providers and I am pleased this legislation will help them focus their resources on deploying more broadband, which rural America desperately needs, while giving them time to comply with the FCC’s new requirements. This bipartisan legislation is proof of how members working together across the aisle can cooperate and actually get things accomplished for the American people. I look forward to working with my colleagues to get this important legislation passed in the House and eventually signed into law.”

 

Posted in David Loebsack, Internet Issues | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Dave Loebsack Works Across The Aisle For Rural Broadband Development

How You Can Help Defeat Branstad’s Corrupt Agenda For Iowa

alec-exposed-in-iowa-14-638It doesn’t have to be a model ALEC bill. Branstad is still facilitating ALEC’s anti-public education, pro-corporation agenda with this plan. To him, Iowa’s terrible water quality is just another perfect opportunity to take money from public education and give it to his friends.

Action Alert From Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (CCI):

Branstad’s $4.7 Billion Blunder

Governor Branstad’s plan to steal funds from schools to support “voluntary” measures should be DOA.

Branstad has released his “signature” plan for water quality, and the idea stinks more than the factory farm manure polluting our rivers!

The Governor – now acknowledging that Iowa is facing a clean water crisis – thinks that voluntary measures will work to clean it up. And to support those voluntary measures he has proposed taking $4.7 billion dollars over the next 30 years out of a voter approves fund that supports school and education infrastructure.

Take action now to stop House File 2382 – corporate ag must pay to clean up their own mess, not us.

We shouldn’t be robbing Peter to pay Paul, especially when it hurts our communities’ schools.

And, we shouldn’t throw tax-payer money at voluntary measures that don’t work. NO industry has voluntarily regulated itself.

We need tough rules and regulations that crack down on factory farm and ag pollution, not public funded measures that let corporate agribusinesses carry on with business as usual.

Take action now for a Clean Water Iowa! Tell your legislator to vote no on Branstad’s bad water plan bill.

Help Iowa CCI Action reach 2,000 fans on Facebook. Click here!

IOWA CCI ACTION Fund
2001 Forest Ave
Des Moines, IA 50311-3229
515-282-0484 . http://www.cciaction.org

Posted in Branstad, Calls to Action | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on How You Can Help Defeat Branstad’s Corrupt Agenda For Iowa

Advocates For Iowa Medicaid To Hold Rally At State Capitol

iowa capitolDES MOINES – Former Iowa Governor Chet Culver and a diverse group of health care providers, medical professionals, disability advocates, Medicaid beneficiaries and their families will be staging a rally at the Iowa State Capitol on Wednesday, February 24th, to raise awareness of peoples’ concerns regarding the proposed privatization of Medicaid in Iowa.

“Over the last few weeks, hundreds of Iowans have attended town meetings, contacted public officials, and have told their stories in every part of the state,” said Governor Culver. “While we do not know what the federal government will decide, we do know that they are listening to Iowans – which is why it is so important for people affected by this proposal to make their voices heard.”

There are currently more than 560,000 Iowans who currently use Medicaid, and very few have had an opportunity to speak out to our government or to the decision makers. This includes more than 120,000 Iowans with disabilities – people who stand to lose the most with this move.

The rally at the State Capitol is the culmination of a series of town hall meetings and citizen involvement throughout the state in the last four weeks, with one goal in mind – to make sure that policymakers put Iowans first as they determine their next steps.

Details:
What: Advocates for Iowa Medicaid Rally
Where: State Capitol Rotunda
Date: February 24th, 2016
When: 2:00-4:00 PM

This event is open to the public.

Media Contact:
Pete McRoberts
pete@chetculvergroup.com
(319) 429-1785

Posted in Calls to Action, Chet Culver, Iowa legislature 2016, medicaid expansion | Comments Off on Advocates For Iowa Medicaid To Hold Rally At State Capitol

How China Came To Own Iowa’s Land And Politics

Alechttps://harpers.org/2016/the-trouble-with-iowa

Starting with the suit by Des Moines Water Works over farm pollution in Des Moines’ drinking water that is now in federal court, this article covers everything from Steve King, Bruce Rastetter, chickens, pork, Tyson Foods, Smithfield, Shuanghui Group, Pizza Ranch, Cruz, evangelicals, Tom Vilsack, China, Branstad, the vast right-wing conspiracy and why the presidential race doesn’t matter nearly as much as what is going on right here in our state. The complete article is 7 pages long and well worth the time. Here are a few excerpts. To read the entire article, go to Harpers.org – The Trouble With Iowa – Corn, Corruption and the Presidential Caucuses by Richard Manning.

“There is no doubt that conservatives would like to win the presidency, but they don’t actually need to. We have a naïve sense that to correct wrongs in our country, we simply need to elect the right president, pass the right laws, and that’s that. Politics in a state such as Iowa, however, teaches us that laws are only the beginning of the process, the opening bell for litigation, lobbying, and defiance. Faced with a federal mandate to regulate hog manure, Branstad simply cut the budget that paid for inspectors. Likewise, he roundly criticized William Stowe, urging Des Moines Water Works to address its issues with collaboration and volunteerism.”

Big ag poisoning our state

“The problem is simple enough. Rain falls on Iowa pure and clean, but it arrives at Stowe’s intake pipes a few hours later sufficiently polluted to violate federal standards for drinking water. Farmers have been raising corn and hogs in Iowa, and the people of Des Moines have been drinking river water, ever since the Civil War, but only in the past decade or two have the nitrogen fertilizers from industrial agriculture rendered that water undrinkable.

“These days a fair amount of the nitrates are derived not so much directly from chemical fertilizers as from hog manure. There are about 21 million hogs in Iowa, and almost all of them live in hog factories. Each hog produces the waste of about 2.5 people, meaning Iowa bears the shit equivalent, from hogs alone, of about 45 million people, some fifteen times its human population.

“But Iowa also has 52 million laying chickens, 50 million of which are in concentrated animal-feeding operations (CAFOs) that hold more than 100,000 birds. These birds likewise produce more manure than all the people in the state. Almost none of it passes through a sewage-treatment plant or even a septic tank before making its way through drainage pipes to the public waterways and drinking water…”

It doesn’t have to be this way

“There’s another way to fix the problem. It involves simple measures such as running farm-field drainage pipes into restored wetlands and permanent pastures instead of rivers. Ten acres of wetland can treat the runoff from 1,000 acres of hard-farmed corn. By timing their applications, farmers might also apply less fertilizer while still ensuring their yields. These measures do not mean growing less food, though they might require some different crops, maybe even raising a few cattle on grass. Scientists from the state’s agricultural department and Iowa State University have penciled out and tested a program of such low-tech solutions.

“If 40 percent of the cropland claimed by corn were planted with other crops and permanent pasture, the whole litany of problems caused by industrial agriculture — certainly the nitrate pollution of drinking water — would begin to evaporate. There are no technological or financial hurdles to implementing this program, but there is a political obstacle: the federal government would have to stop subsidizing the growing of corn. Between 1995 and 2012, those subsidies amounted to $84 billion.

“Tysonization” of Iowa

“Iowans have one way of saying this: they lament that their state has been “chickenized.” You could more specifically say it has been “Tysonized.” Tyson Foods prefers to describe the process as vertical integration… The process depended on a networked system of growers and farmers, who became contractors… Growers in a given region were lumped in a pool and paid on the basis of a competitive scheme that ranked them according to the pounds of chicken produced per pound of feed. Everything was tightly monitored by a flow of data that measured corn and soy in, McNuggets out. A productivity gain of a few percentage points meant the difference between bankruptcy and a paycheck for many growers — several people I met in Iowa called them ‘serfs.'”

The Pizza Ranch Strategy

“The chain offers several forms of industrial pork and chicken embedded in a matrix of cheap carbohydrates, but also satisfies a different need: Pizza Ranch “believes in the power of prayer. If you have a specific issue that you would like us to pray for, please send it in using the form below.”

The chain is a mandatory stop for Republican presidential hopefuls. The Republican contest in Iowa is really a struggle for the evangelical vote, which has slowly accumulated in Cruz’ corner… Mike Huckabee told the Des Moines Register that he won the 2008 caucuses in large part through such visits: “We created the Pizza Ranch strategy. A lot of people have copied it since then, but I think we created it.”

“This election cycle, klatches at the chain take place almost daily: a candidate in a suit (or jeans, depending on the desired optics of the day) scarfs a slice while ringed by ruddy men in ball caps, most of them obese, many of them corn growers, chicken growers, or hog growers under contract to a handful of corporations. There they speak about the problems that affect their lives, such as the coming imposition of sharia law. They also talk about the need for the federal government to “get out of the way” of free enterprise, especially their particular brand of federally subsidized free enterprise.”

“Tom Vilsack has been a terrible disappointment.”

When Obama appointed Vilsack as agriculture secretary soon after taking office, it was a way of making good on his campaign promise to reform industrial agriculture. As governor of Iowa, Vilsack had been a supporter of reform, and as agriculture secretary he used antitrust regulation to challenge the Tyson-engineered tournament system. Tyson responded by joining with Smithfield and other meat producers to mount a multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign, complete with astroturf opposition and congressional arm-twisting. Big Ag outplayed Vilsack at nearly every turn, and he quickly backpedaled on the new rules. Finally, Congress killed the reform effort late in 2011. Two years later, with the fundamentals of its business plan intact, Smithfield sold itself to the Shuanghui Group, a Chinese company. What Smithfield sold to the Chinese was less its pork production than its control of Iowa’s politics and its landscape.”

Who Owns Iowa?

“The irony of some of the world’s last remaining Communists taking over from Iowa’s swine capitalists is outdone only by Donald Trump, who spends whatever time he isn’t using to bash immigrants bashing the Chinese. He offers no hint, of course, about how he might best the Shuanghui Group, which, through finely honed contracts, now controls the landscape of all that beautiful corn in the Midwest.”

“Schooling the candidates about the realities of who owns Iowa, [Branstad] said that Xi “calls us old friends, not just me but a lot of people in the state of Iowa. That’s an important trading partner, so we want to keep that relationship.”

“Faced with regulation that will limit the carbon emissions that are killing the planet, Mitch McConnell, the majority leader of the U.S. Senate, a fellow who has sworn to uphold the Constitution, urged states to violate the law. The tightly organized, cohesive network that is the American right wing has abrogated the social contract with wholesale, institutionalized civil disobedience. Want to regulate the manner in which farms pump liquid shit? Sure. Can you do it with the twenty-eight inspectors Iowa has to oversee 4,000 hog factories, the pumping on which occurs almost entirely during a few weeks in autumn, and often at night?”

“As Stowe says, all they have to do is to protect the status quo. To do that, they don’t need to play to checkmate; stalemate and gridlock are success enough.”

Posted in Branstad, Corporate Greed, Farming | Comments Off on How China Came To Own Iowa’s Land And Politics