Building A Blue Wave

What color do you see? Photo Credit – Wikimedia Commons

People are excited by the prospect of flipping the Iowa House and governorship in November. I share the excitement, and note such voters are engaged in politics more than most who will show up at the polls.

I’ll be convinced a blue wave is coming when I hear people other than candidates, those hired to work in politics, or activists tell me about it. Right now it seems a big blue bubble, especially when I talk to people I’ve known for years.

Time will tell and many of us will be working it because, as Fred Hubbell suggested, “blue waves must be created.” Democrats are not there yet.

Ocean waves look pretty green to me.

“The ocean looks blue because red, orange and yellow (long wavelength light) are absorbed more strongly by water than is blue (short wavelength light),” according to Scientific American. “So when white light from the sun enters the ocean, it is mostly the blue that gets returned. Same reason the sky is blue.”

Are we Democrats seeing blue because of what we can’t see?

Media outlets glom onto the obvious. A replacement to fill Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy’s U.S. Supreme Court seat when he retires; activities of “the resistance;” the perennial non-debate over immigration reform; active discussion about overturning Roe v. Wade; and yes, new developments about Hillary Clinton’s emails.

What’s going on in the ocean of voters?

Democrats are choosing more female candidates for the U.S. Congress and down ticket.

“In many respects, the Democratic tilt toward female candidates is the logical culmination of the political dynamics since Trump’s election,” Ronald Brownstein wrote at CNN. “Coming after he bragged about sexually assaulting women in the 2005 ‘Access Hollywood’ tape, Trump’s election provoked its greatest backlash among Democratic-leaning women. That intensity was immediately apparent in the unprecedented women-led protest marches the weekend of Trump’s inauguration. The emergence of the #metoo movement and the proliferation of sexual harassment allegations against powerful men in other arenas has only added fuel to that fire.”

Democrats, men and women, are fired up about this. Will it win over non-college educated white women who favored Trump in 2016? Probably not. Will it fire up the Democratic base? It already has. The base is far from enough to win in November.

This talk has a secondary impact on voters. More influential are statements like the one made at a recent gathering of men in our neighborhood.

Regardless of the ocean of pixels spilled about a Democratic blue wave, the election will reduce itself to small gatherings of voters doing work that must be done in the community. The community water main was leaking in that hole in the ground. We had gathered, not to talk politics, but to fix the leak. So it is with many non-politically active voters, men and women.

The grunt work of winning elections is not fun. Knocking on doors, making phone calls, and networking with friends, family and neighbors to promote candidates, are part of activating voters. Cecile Richards was in Des Moines last week and captured the challenge of midterm elections.

“Millions of women who even voted in the presidential election won’t go vote this November,” Richards said. “Thousands of them here in Iowa will stay home. Thousands would be enough to determine the governor’s race or a congressional seat or taking back state house and state senate seats. But we can change that… the single most important reason people said they didn’t go out to vote is that no one asked them.”

The campaigns for which I work plan to ask men and women to make a plan to vote.

The notion of a Democratic blue wave can be a place holder for people to do nothing to influence an election outcome, even in the time of Trump. Rather than get involved in politics, people hear there’s a blue wave coming and kick back into already challenging lives, intending to ride the wave.

There is no blue wave. There will only be one if we make it between now and election day.

Posted in 2018 Election Campaign, Progressive Community | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Break In At A Nuclear Weapons Storage Facility

Photo Credit – Pressenza International Press Agency

Yesterday, a group of peace activists gained access to a site on a German Air Force Base where 20 U.S. nuclear weapons are stored.

“The peace activists cut through razor wire and some other fences and several made it to the runway; three activists walked to a nuclear weapons bunker, and climbed up to the top where they were undetected for an hour,” according to the International Press Agency. “All 18 were eventually found by soldiers, handed over to the civil police, ID checked, and released from the base after 4-½ hours.”

This was personal.

One of the many jobs I had while serving in the Cold War Army was to standby in the event a nearby nuclear weapons storage facility suffered a break in or terrorist attack.

I was there when the Baader-Meinhof Gang, later known as the Red Army Faction, rose to prominence. I was stationed at a kaserne on the Rhine River during the “German Autumn” when Baader Meinhof and others committed murder, kidnapping, hijacking and more. Here’s a taste of what it was like where I lived from Wikipedia:

The German Autumn (German: Deutscher Herbst) was a set of events in late 1977, associated with the kidnapping and murder of industrialist Hanns Martin Schleyer, president of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations (BDA) and the Federation of German Industries (BDI), by the Red Army Faction (RAF) insurgent group, and the hijacking of the Lufthansa airplane Landshut by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). They demanded the release of ten RAF members detained at the Stammheim Prison plus two Palestinian compatriots held in Turkey and $15 million in exchange for the hostages. The assassination of Siegfried Buback, the attorney-general of West Germany on April 7, 1977, and the failed kidnapping and murder of the banker Jürgen Ponto on July 30, 1977, marked the beginning of the German Autumn. It ended on Oct. 18, with the liberation of the Landshut, the death of the leading figures of the first generation of the RAF in their prison cells, and the death of Schleyer.

Those were tense times. I remember German police cars on every corner and at every Autobahn exit during key moments in the drama that fall. Our unit was often on alert for potential response to an incident.

We were never called to secure a terrorist attack site. However, yesterday’s incident raises some questions about our deployment of nuclear weapons in Germany.

Why isn’t the United States working toward fulfilling our agreement in the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) to eliminate nuclear weapons? Not only do we have a legal obligation, there is a moral imperative to do so.

Is Germany permitted to deliver U.S. nuclear weapons with their aircraft as part of NATO? Quoting from the article, “On this air force base, German pilots stand ready to fly Tornado fighter jets with U.S. B-61 nuclear bombs and could even drop them, on orders from U.S. President Donald Trump on targets in or near Europe.” Since Germany is not a nuclear state recognized in the NPT, it may be illegal for them to do so.

The incident at Air Force Base Büchel is not getting much press in the wake of today’s Donald Trump – Vladimir Putin meeting in Helsinki. Maybe it should.

Posted in Nuclear Abolition, Nuclear Disarmament | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Break In At A Nuclear Weapons Storage Facility

The Great American Give-Away

Coyote Natural Bridge, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah. Photo Credit – Wikimedia Commons

The Trump administration is giving away access to our public lands for discovery and exploitation of minerals and fossil fuel reserves. Conservatives and mining interests are setting a place at the table to get their share.

“Trump signed a pair of proclamations late last year reducing the size of the 1.35-million-acre Bears Ears National Monument by 85 percent and the 1.87-million-acre Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument by roughly 50 percent,” according to Huffington Post. “It was the largest reduction of national monuments in history, with more than 2 million acres losing protections. Prohibitions on new hard-rock mining claims in those now-unprotected areas were lifted in early February.”

The administration’s assault on national monuments is upsetting on a number of levels. It is the culmination of an effort by conservatives to divest government control over national parks and monuments, something most of us thought was long settled.

It’s not settled at all.

A Canadian mining firm, Glacier Lake Resources, Inc., has staked a claim on land that was, until recently, part of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah. The Vancouver-based company said in a press release it plans to mine copper, cobalt, zinc, and other minerals from the Colt Mesa deposit about 35 miles southeast of Boulder, Utah.

On Feb. 2, four members of the Lamoreaux family, which owns a small mineral company called Alpine Gems LLC, staked an 80-acre claim near Butler Valley, southeast of Cannonville. On May 9, Alpine Gems staked three 20-acre claims in that same area.

Last week, Utah Senator Mike Lee introduced the Protecting Utah’s Rural Economy Act in the Congress. He explained in an opinion piece he wrote for the Deseret News. Here are two excerpts that provide the gist of it:

The looming danger for Utah’s rural communities comes from the Antiquities Act of 1906, which was originally intended to protect objects of historic and cultural interest, such as artifacts and religious sites.

Unfortunately, what was once a narrowly targeted tool for preventing looting on federal lands has become a weapon of faraway elites to use against hardworking rural Americans.

That is why I am introducing the Protect Utah’s Rural Economy, or PURE, Act. This bill would protect Utah from future abuses under the Antiquities Act by prohibiting the president from establishing or expanding a national monument in Utah unless the proposed monument has been authorized by an act of Congress and the state Legislature.

Rural Americans want what all Americans want: a dignified, decent-paying job, a family to love and support and a healthy community whose future is determined by local residents — not their self-styled betters thousands of miles away.

Lee’s argument is a genome away from political theorist and the seventh vice president of the United States John C. Calhoun’s arguments in support of slavery and state’s rights. Calhoun is remembered for defending slavery and for advancing the concept of minority rights in politics, which he did in the context of defending white Southern interests from perceived Northern threats, according to Wikipedia.

The Wilderness Society is challenging Trump’s proclamations in court and monitoring the progress of the companies seeking to extract minerals. It may not be enough.

Read more about The Wilderness Society’s efforts to protect our wild areas and fight back against the anti-conservationist movement at wilderness.org. If you are in a position to help financially, here is a link to donate to the Wilderness Society.

Posted in Environment | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Thomas Frank To Read At Prairie Lights

What’s the Matter With Kansas and Listen, Liberal author and journalist Thomas Frank will read from his new book of essays, Rendezvous With Oblivion: Reports from a Sinking Society on July 18 at 7 p.m. at Prairie Lights Bookstore Iowa City.

What does a middle-class democracy look like when it comes apart? When, after forty years of economic triumph, America’s winners persuade themselves that they owe nothing to the rest of the country.  For those who despair of the future of our country and of reason itself, Rendezvous with Oblivion is a booster shot of energy, reality, and moral outrage.

Thomas Frank is a former columnist for The Wall Street Journal and Harper’s, the founding editor of The Baffler and writes regularly for The Guardian. He lives outside Washington, D.C.

“A decade of fraud, exploitation, and hypocrisy gets mercilessly dissected in these caustic essays.  . . . In several trenchant pieces probing Donald Trump’s rise, Frank avoids simplistic claims of voter bigotry and instead emphasizes issues of trade, economic decline, and the Democrats’ abandonment of the working class for a politics of centrist neoliberalism. Frank’s combination of insightful analysis, moral passion, and keen satirical wit make these essays both entertaining and an important commentary on the times.” — PW starred review

Posted in Local Events | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Thomas Frank To Read At Prairie Lights

Hubbell Promises To Restore Medicaid. Thank You!

Hubbell Hart

Rita Hart and Fred Hubbell

 

As many have read we have been navigating the health care system with an elderly relative for the past couple of months. What we have found has been very problematic. You can find my most recent post on this just down the page.

Our health care system grew into a disjointed sprawl over many decades. Obamacare was a good first step in reigning in some of the problems. Unfortunately Republicans wasted little time in taking sledge hammers and ball peen hammers to the program.

One of the sledge hammers here in Iowa was the Branstad / Reynolds administration turning Medicaid administration over to fumbling, bumbling private companies whose focus is profits, not patient outcomes.

This not only affect the direct medicaid patients, but the cutback in payments to doctors and hospitals have forced them to make cuts to their services which has hurt all patients.

So we were very happy to see Candidate Fred Hubbell come out with a forceful statement that he will work from day 1 to bring Medicaid back under state control. 

That gets at least 6 votes in my family right there. Nearly every family in the state has been affected by the Reynolds / Branstad Medicaid policy and I haven’t read of any that have been affected in a positive way.

So thanks to the Hubbell – Hart team. This is the change real Iowans are looking for

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, Branstad, Kim Reynolds | Tagged | Comments Off on Hubbell Promises To Restore Medicaid. Thank You!

Sunday Funday: And It’s Fair Season Edition

Image (1) countyfair01-big.jpg for post 26323

The middle of July and it is time for county fairs. These slice of Americana are often one of the core events in a county every year. In agricultural states they are the high water mark of the calendar year. This is the time when animals, crops and handmade goods are judged for their worthiness to go on to the state fair competition. Often a full year of work gets is on the line when the judges make their choices.

When fairs began and prospered in this state there was no electricity, cars or trucks or other modern conveniences. As the world has progressed especially in recent years, the pull of the county fair for most citizens has waned. Where the fair was once one of the few places where a person could view new gadgets we can now do that instantly on our phones any time of any day.

Yet a day at the local fair is always a day that will be memorable. A place to eat foods you would never eat elsewhere, see old friends, catch some free entertainment under a shady tree and maybe score a prize for one of the kids. You can also view the prize winning work of your friends and neighbors that exhibit everything from calves to pies and flowers.

A day at the fair will also be magical for the kids and they gaze at the food wagons, take in the bright lights and ride the big rides. Have Fun at your local fair in the next few weeks!

Yet another WTH week.

  1. One of the most beloved Iowans, what former governor died last Sunday at age 89?
  1. In a mockery of a congressional hearing what FBI agent was grilled by hostile Republican congress members?
  1. Hey, another presidential pardon! What fine upstanding citizens were pardoned this week?
  1. Kim Jung Un made a fool our Secretary of State last week. North Korea released a photo of Kim visiting where instead of negotiating with Pompeo?
  1. In a public statement at the NATO summit our Dear Leader publicly claimed what country was “a captive of Russia?”
  1. Due to public demonstrations against him, Dear Leader had to forego a trip to what international capitol?
  1. In a real surprise what small Balkan country finds its soccer team in the championship World Cup game today?
  1. No matter what, what will be significant about the new Justice that will be appointed to the Iowa Supreme Court this fall?
  1. Iowa Democratic gubernatorial candidate Fred Hubbell promised last week to restore what program to state control?
  1. Indictments were handed down for what group on Friday as announce by Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein?
  1. The US not only opposed what UN resolution but threatened trade sanctions on some countries that support the resolution?
  1. Among the most inspiring news of the week and maybe for years was the story of the rescue of the Thailand soccer team from a flooded what?
  1. In Britain, what former London Mayor and Foreign minister left the Theresa May cabinet as her government got shakier and shakier?
  1. Speaking of Britain, a group of protesters flew a huge balloon of who as a baby in a diaper as that world leader visited Britain?
  1. In an interview with the Sun newspaper in Britain, Dear Leader claimed he had better poll numbers than what earlier Republican president?
  1. Brett Kavanaugh was nominated by Dear Leader for SCOTUS Monday. Kavanaugh is probably the only judge in America who believes that a sitting what should not be bothered by legal matters?
  1. What pizza magnate resigned as board chair following another racial slur incident?
  1. What inmate in the Russian probe lost his VIP jail accommodations when he complained that the location interfered with his ability to prepare for his trial?
  1. Dawn Sturgess died in Britain after exposure to a nerve agent known to be used by what country?
  1. What high administration official came to Iowa last week and gave little but lip service to Iowa farmers beset by administration trade policies?

Heard on the radio:

“Vote Republican for your boss’s boss. Vote Democratic for your children’s children.”

Answers:

  1. Robert D. Ray
  1. Peter Strzok
  1. In Oregon, Dwight and Steven Hammond who set fires on public lands were pardoned.
  1. A potato farm
  1. Germany
  1. London
  1. Croatia
  1. The new justice will be a woman as all candidates are women. The current Iowa SC is all male
  1. Medicaid – thank you Fred!
  1. 12 Russian intelligence officers
  1. A resolution to promote breastfeeding
  1. Cave
  1. Boris Johnson
  1. Dear Leader
  1. Abraham Lincoln
  1. President – lucky for Dear Leader that Kavanaugh believes that
  1. Papa John Schnatter
  1. Paul Manafort
  1. Russia –  it was the same agent that nearly killed the Skripals
  1. VP Mike Pence
Trump in Europe

once again a tip of the hat to democraticunderground.com

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: And It’s Fair Season Edition

Dan Rather Facebook Post 7/13/2018

Dan_Rather

pic from wikipedia

From Dan Rather’s facebook page:

From the farce of yesterday’s hearing on Capitol Hill (“oversight” by mendacity) to the spectacle in Great Britain (a President’s destabilizing, unstable, and racist interview) to the trailing exhaust of American leadership left in Brussels (with a friend like the U.S. who needs… Russia?) to what awaits in Helsinki (a bromance with a wily KGB agent), what we are witnessing is far beyond the realm of this reporter to put into full context. 

I doubt Dante could imagine the circles in which we find ourselves. P.T. Barnum couldn’t figure out a way to sell it. And Rod Serling would shake his head in disbelief. All metaphors are rendered largely impotent – be they circus, swamp, or dumpster fire – because they seem to understate the sheer dangerous absurdity of it all. There can be no individual accounting of all damage. 

I surmise this is what in some ways passes for the strategy of the President and his accomplices. See how many reactionary judges they can install, how many loopholes for the rich and connected they can construct, how many protections to health, water and air they can shred before the inevitable backlash. 

I list all of this not to sow the seeds of hopelessness. Quite the contrary. That is what the forces of authoritarianism wish – that they can launch a reclamation of the Gilded Age on the backs of a demoralized majority. But I have seen these types of actors before. I have seen these odds. They cannot understand that the forces of goodness can channel a fury of righteousness and action. The time for slumber is over. No one can ever argue that elections do not have consequences. Even with the hurdles they are erecting to democracy no President and no political party, no matter how cynical they may be, is bigger than the country at large. 

Editor’s comment:

The goal of Trumppublicans was to disrupt. This was not stated by Dear Leader. His job was to lie and keep resistance tamped down.

Steve Bannon and others expressed the real goal of disruption. So far they have tremendously disrupted our country and our individual lives.

Could you have imagined two years ago that we would have a president under investigation for treason? That our allies would be seen as our enemies and our enemies as our allies. Who could have thought that NATO would be a punching bag for a US president? That we would be breaking trading partnerships with our closest and most trusted allies? 

We all knew that Obamacare would be a major target as would Roe v. Wade. But who could have imagined that soybean farmers and pork producers would also be targets. It is little surprise for a Trumppublican administration to open the treasury and hand it off to their rich donors, but who thought they would kick the teeth of their base in?

Racism is making a huge and very open comeback. Everyday we see a new video of attacks on people of color with racist language and often using police to act as a quasi military against people of color. 

Every cabinet official was chosen not because of their expertise in a given area but specifically for their animosity to the area they were charged with. Betsy DeVos at Education and Scott Pruitt at the EPA may be the worst, but others are not far behind.

But who, two years ago, could ever have imagined that our government would be jailing babies? That out government would be ripping families apart never to be united again. The specter of babies being hauled into court at age 1 to defend themselves is beyond absurd – yet it is reality in America today.

So we have an election on November 6th. You can accept today’s reality and vote for Trumppublicans or not vote. Not voting is a vote for what is happening. Or you can get off your butts today and get to work to end this madness. There are candidates in nearly every race from the county courthouse to the statehouse and congress that are standing up to say “ENOUGH!”

They need workers, they need money and they need your vote and that of your friends. 

If you don’t just try to imagine what else could be coming. Maybe your children in jail? You may laugh, but did you ever imagine what is going on at the border in your name?

If you think this could never happen to US citizens, let me tell you about the citizens of Puerto Rico who have been abandoned by their government in a time of greatest need.

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Dismantling Healthcare In The US

Image (1) medicare-cutoff-question.jpg for post 14844

As I wrote last week we have been deeply involved in the health care system as an elderly relative seems to be entering the latter stages of life. 

What a goddamned mess. It is so hard to believe that Americans have gone through such a totally discombobulated system without near riots. We were at that point during the 2008 presidential campaign when the combination of outrageous costs, pre-existing conditions, disjointed care, bankruptcies caused by health care bills led to the health care system being one of the top issues.

Ten years later and hundreds of thousands of hours of media blitz against Obamacare, attacks in courts and nibbling away at state levels we are almost back in the same situation once again. Now that our Dear Leader has a candidate for the SCOTUS who is known to be totally opposed to government involvement in healthcare, crashing not just Obamacare but other areas of healthcare as well. Think of chipping away at Medicare and Medicaid through the courts.

Add into that the “progress” the right has made over the years in chipping away at a woman’s right to choose since the 1973 decision of Roe v. Wade. Iowa now has the most restrictive abortion restrictions in the country on the books and going through the court system. There is a very good chance that Iowa’s bill may end up as the test case to overturn Roe.

Then just to add insult, the current administration announced last Saturday evening – the Saturday of a holiday weekend – that they would be cutting billions paid to insurers from other insurers to even out the risk costs. This is not “government” money. The Hill does a great job of explaining how this will scare insurers and probably drastically raise premiums:

The flurry of activity is the result of a surprise announcement Saturday by the administration that it had suspended $10.4 billion in funding that is supposed to be paid to insurers to help them provide coverage to particularly sick and costly enrollees.

Insurers denounced the move.

“This action will significantly increase 2019 premiums for millions of individuals and small-business owners and could result in far fewer health plan choices,” Scott Serota, CEO of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, said in a statement. “It will undermine Americans’ access to affordable coverage, particularly those who need medical care the most.”

With that as background we continue to try to do what is right for our elderly relative. This has involved 4 or 5 trips to the ER that are certainly costly not to mention hard on a body. It has also involved a change of nursing homes. Some of the care here has been, shall we say kindly, not up to snuff causing discomfort for the patient and some confrontational moments.

And at every stop along the path there is a little cop of sorts that hops out and screams “payment first!” Well that is hyperbole, but it feels like it. “How will you pay? How will you pay? Over and over.

We have the presentation of the insurance papers – one of those “privatized” Medicare policies that seems to put a scare into every one that sees it. Then after the various treatments have been administered here comes the insurance specter once again to hover over the process. The specter acts like a presence that constantly nags “get her out of the hospital. Don’t pay one penny extra! Coverage ends today at noon!” 

Once we went to visit in the hospital and found her just being loaded into a van for a trip back to the nursing home without any notification to us. Just this week we arrange a discharge plan for the next day only to be called on our way home to be told that insurance would not cover her after noon so she had already been transferred back to the nursing home. 

The patient has seemingly been tossed back and forth like a bag of beans. Then we got a call from the nursing home informing us that her status had been changed. This resulted in some additional charges and they needed some money up front – today.

Just think – our patient had done some planning and had insurances and plans. I shudder to think what a person who had one of the new crap policies that Iowa is selling now would do. Medicaid has changed drastically in this state. Branstad and Reynold’s privatization has dried up much of those funds and put it into the hands of businesses instead of providing patient care.

Along with having fewer funds available for Medicaid patients, the privatized Medicaid organizations have not been paying bills on time, paying at lower rates or denying claims after services have been rendered. Thus hospitals across the state have had to eat millions of dollars in costs that have not been reimbursed. All they can do is cut back on personnel and services. This can make a hospital stay traumatic at times.

In a previous life I helped design a flow chart of our business. The object of this exercise was to identify stopping points in our system that added costs and decreased service to the customer. Certainly the ideal flow would be from the manufacturing line to the customer with no stops except the loading and unloading of the transport truck. No warehousing, no moving it around between warehouses or inside warehouses or any other handling or processing that would add costs without adding benefits.

Applying this in our situation, the ideal would be to get the patient in a care system where the patients needs are the focal point of the system. When there is need to move the patient for extra care, all costs are covered and a plan is made and executed with input from the family. The patient’s health is always top concern. Thus moves, change of medications, health care personnel are all planned as best as is possible. The system should be set up so that money concerns are eliminated. There is simply a continuous alignment toward a good health end.

I am told this is how many countries have their single payer systems aligned. I understand this is the concept behind the team concept at the Mayo Clinic.

Instead our current system is similar to the Middle Ages where castles with moats and drawbridges are erected. Every time a patient must go to a different castle their must be a tribute paid. At the end of the visit, communications between castles may or may not happen. 

America has lots of very smart and talented people yet we let this non-system that seems to be set up for the benefit of the insurance companies just clunk along. The people who are in charge of making these changes seem to be captives of the insurance companies. 

Health care needs to be a top priority this election. If it isn’t it may be even more dismantled by 2020. Do you want to bet your life on it? Because that is already what is being done!

And if all that isn’t enough, Monday HHS is planning on deleting 20 years of critical medical guidelines. Don’t believe it? Read it and weep here. If we leave Republicans in charge expect bleeding as a medical procedure to make a comeback.   

Posted in #trumpresistance, 2018 Election Campaign, Blog for Iowa, Branstad, Health Care & Medicare, Kim Reynolds, Medicare | Tagged | Comments Off on Dismantling Healthcare In The US

Important Changes In Early Voting

With Iowa’s new voter ID law the rules changed for early voting.

Here’s good information from Johnson County Auditor Travis Weipert about the new rules. I modified the press release to make it applicable statewide.

It’s less than 120 days until the Nov. 6 election, and voters may now request mailed absentee ballots. Request forms are available on the Secretary of State website where a page is devoted to early voting. The site can be found here. Ballots will be mailed beginning Oct. 8, which is also the first day for in-person early voting.

Note that under the new voter ID law, absentee ballot request forms must include the correct ID number. There is not an “oath” option for mailed absentee ballots – if you do not provide the correct ID number, the auditor cannot mail you a ballot.

If you have an Iowa Driver’s license or Iowa non-driver ID you are required to list that number.  If you don’t have an Iowa license or non-driver ID, use the PIN number from your voter card. (Voters with an Iowa license or non-driver ID do not have a PIN number). The auditor cannot accept the last four digits of a Social Security number on an absentee ballot request.

Voters should visit their county auditor web site or call them with any questions. The Secretary of State provides contact information for all 99 Iowa counties here.

Posted in 2018 Election Campaign, voting rights | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Help For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Photo Credit – Campaign Website

A lot of pixels have been spilled over the primary election win of Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on June 26.

Regardless of the methods of her election or her platform — or the buzz around beating 10-term incumbent Joe Crowley in New York’s 14th Congressional District — if she wins in November she will be one of 435 members of the House of Representatives.

To get anything done, she will need help from other legislators as she attempts to carry the momentum from her district to the Congress. What help can she expect?

Establishment Democrats

“Establishment Democrats” is shorthand that rose to common usage during the 2016 primary season to serve as the whipping boy for all that was perceived to be wrong with the Democratic Party. Think of Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz or maybe John Podesta. To the extent members of congress have been categorized as part of the establishment, I believe Ocasio-Cortez will find more common ground with them than not. In any case, she could take a lesson from establishment pol in chief Hillary Clinton when it comes to legislating. Become less a personality in the Congress and more someone willing to work hard to find common ground on issues that matter as Hillary did when she was elected to the U.S. Senate from New York. If she does this, such establishment Democrats as there are will reciprocate.

Hispanic Caucus

The Hispanic caucus has been welcoming despite being more conservative than Ocasio-Cortez. One of her signature policies is abolishing ICE and she outlined a process within the caucus to legislate it.

“What we can do is — I’m unafraid to champion a really bold and strong stance in the sand, and what that does is give us an anchor, a negotiating point,” she said. “I think the abolishment of ICE makes a lot of sense, and I’m willing to have those conversations and figure out how we get that done as a caucus.”

Abolishing ICE is a lightning rod that could diminish Ocasio-Cortez’ influence. I predict regardless of the outcome of abolishing ICE, media (and not just FOX News) will paint her as either a hero or the goat soon after the 116th Congress convenes based on this sole issue. A competent legislator will find there are a lot of ways to shave ice. The Congress has been unwilling to address immigration and naturalization since the Reagan administration. If the time has come, I believe Ocasio-Cortez and the Hispanic caucus will be part of it, bringing new energy and ideas to the stale debate.

Democratic Leader

More than anyone in the U.S. House of Representatives, Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi knows how to count votes. While Ocasio-Cortez indicated she may vote for someone else as speaker/leader if elected, unseating Pelosi seems unlikely in the 116th Congress. That means Ocasio-Cortez will have to develop a relationship with her to get anything done. She would be foolish not to.

For Iowa Democrats who worked on many campaigns, it was great to see someone use the skills and techniques in the progressive activists kit bag to win big against an entrenched incumbent. Winning in November looks like a cake walk in Ocasio-Cortez’ heavily Democratic district. Assuming she wins, her real work will begin in the 116th Congress. She will find plenty of Democratic help among liberals, centrists, conservatives and everyone in between.

Adrian Carrasquillo wrote about Ocasio-Cortez’ potential relationship with the Hispanic Caucus at The Intercept here.

Posted in Progressive Community | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Help For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez