Bakken Oil Pipeline Pledge

BakkenPledge_v2_600px(EDITOR’S NOTE: Ed Fallon has long been a friend of Blog for Iowa. Here is his latest on the Bakken Oil Pipeline).

Over the past two years landowners, farmers, tribes and environmentalists have done everything possible to stop the pipeline.

We have pursued legal and legislative channels at great cost of time and money.

We have held forums, rallies, protests, flotillas, press conferences and more.

We have written letters and opinion pieces for our newspapers, spoken with radio stations and TV reporters, and written countless letters to government agencies.

We have learned more about pipelines, climate change, watersheds and eminent domain than we ever imagined we’d need to know. With the knowledge we’ve acquired, we’ve educated others — and public opinion has moved our direction. The most recent Iowa Poll shows less than half of Iowans support the pipeline while three fourths oppose the use of eminent domain to build it.

We await court rulings on a lawsuit filed by ten Iowa landowners and another just filed by Tribal leaders in the Dakotas, and remain cautiously optimistic that the court will decide in our favor. But barring an injunction, those cases may take time.

Meanwhile our land, water, property rights and climate are being trampled.

From the perspective of climate change, it is unconscionable that our government enables this pipeline to go forward. President Obama claims to understand the seriousness of climate change, having said, “No challenge–no challenge–poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.” Yet he hasn’t lifted a finger to stop this pipeline.

From the perspective of eminent domain, Republican Governor Terry Branstad campaigned against the abuse of eminent domain, yet now has no problem with its use for a powerful, wealthy pipeline company.

From the perspective of our environment, Democratic officials like State Senator Mike Gronstal and Congressman Dave Loebsack either openly support the pipeline or refuse to stand with their constituents against it, despite grave concerns about the potential impact on our land and water.
As with many great struggles before us, when those elected to represent and protect our interests fail to do so, it is incumbent upon the people to challenge an unresponsive government through nonviolent civil disobedience.

In this struggle against the Bakken pipeline, there are two key examples of the failure of law and government to respect and protect our rights.

First is the Army Corps of Engineers’ abdication of its responsibility to assure the safety of our waters. In issuing a permit to Dakota Access, the Corps failed to assess the full range of the pipeline’s probable impacts.

Second, the decision by the Iowa Utilities Board to issue eminent domain to a private company providing no service to Iowans is an assault on the sanctity of our right to own and enjoy property. If government can allow your land to be confiscated for an oil pipeline, where will the assault on liberty strike next?

Yes, it is time to defy an unjust law, time to defend liberty, time to fight the expansion of the fossil-fuel infrastructure and the accompanying destruction of our environment.

In the tradition of other great American struggles for freedom . . .
From the Boston Tea Party to the labor movement struggle to secure rights and freedoms we still enjoy and take for granted;

From the fight for women’s suffrage to the civil rights struggle of the 1960s;

From the Farm Crisis when farmers stood with their neighbors to block foreclosure auctions to the struggles happening now all across the country in opposition to fracking, pipelines and oil drilling;
. . . It is time to step forward and risk arrest.

Over a month ago, a Pledge of Resistance was circulated. The Pledge was initiated by Bold Iowa and supported by Iowa CCI, CREDO Action and 100 Grannies for a Livable Future. To date, over 1,000 people have signed the Pledge, which reads:

“{W}e are the conservatives, standing up for a safe and secure future for our families. It is those we protest, those who profit from poisoning our water, who violate our property rights, and who are radically altering the chemical composition of our atmosphere — and the prospects for survival of humanity — that are the radicals.”

If you are moved, please sign the Pledge and stand with us in a final attempt to stop this pipeline that our planet can’t sustain and most Iowans don’t want.

Ed Fallon
Des Moines

Posted in Bakken pipeline | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Bakken Oil Pipeline Pledge

What's After Paris?

Gore ParisLast week, Al Gore reflected on the ten years since he founded The Climate Reality Project. Following is an excerpt from an email he sent to the Climate Reality Leaders he trained.

Ten years ago, I trained the first group of Climate Reality Leaders in my barn in Carthage, Tenn. I asked them to join me in spreading the word about the urgency of the climate crisis, and I was impressed by the commitment and passion they demonstrated. I’m even more impressed now as the work they’ve done in their own communities and beyond has helped to spark a global movement for action on climate change.

In the decade since that first group came together, I’ve trained more than 10,000 Climate Reality Leaders who are just as committed to making the world a better place for future generations. The Climate Reality Leadership Corps is active in more than 130 countries around the world and represents people from all backgrounds and walks of life. I’ve enjoyed working alongside teachers, scientists, community leaders, business owners, students, and so many others who all share a dedication to promoting solutions to the climate crisis.

Ten years of concerted action by the Climate Reality Leadership Corps came together last year when 195 countries committed to working together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions planet-wide as part of the Paris Agreement. Now, it’s time for us to continue our work together and push countries to strengthen and implement their commitments so we can make the promise of Paris a reality.

Even as we look to the future, I want to make sure we take a moment to appreciate the last 10 years and all of the amazing work that you’ve done to help share the truth about the science and solutions of climate change with your friends, family members, colleagues, and everyone else.

I want to thank each and every one of you for what you’ve done in your own communities to bring attention to the most important issue of our time.

It is easier to play a role in the global effort to mitigate the causes of global warming and climate change when thousands of others are doing the same thing, each in their own way. That’s been my personal benefit from The Climate Reality Project.

I joined in Chicago (August 2013) and have no regrets. I learned the story behind Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth, and the science behind it. Gore presented a broad mix of information about what is happening in our environment because of global warming and how it impacts communities.

Since then, I’ve presented my story to individuals and groups in the area and seek opportunities to do more. I served as a mentor at the Cedar Rapids training last year and have written about the need to act on climate change in my blogs, and in letters to the editor of our local newspaper. When I worked as a freelance correspondent, climate change informed my world-view and was a context in which I framed stories whether they were about farming or forestry, the school board or city council, or about new business openings or individual achievements.

Talking about global warming and climate change has become part of my life.

If the Paris agreement was the culmination of ten years of work, as Gore said it was, the work is not finished.

With a sharp focus on identifying the impact on our climate of CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels, Gore and many allies made the point about seeking alternatives. As solar and wind-generated electricity reach price parity with fossil fuels (and they are doing so faster than anyone imagined) the coal industry is in disarray and nuclear power is waning.

There is a cloud on the hopeful horizon of renewable energy. Buoyed by exploration and discovery of oil and shale gas reserves, companies like British Petroleum, once green washing us with their interest in renewables, divested their interests in solar and wind energy this decade to focus on oil and gas.

I predict declining prices of solar power will help it dominate the future of municipal and regional electricity generation. Already companies like Central Iowa Power Company (CIPCO) are changing their tune. Not so long ago they were promoting nuclear power at their annual shareholder’s meeting. Today, they are building solar arrays.

If there is a blind spot in Gore’s laser focus on burning fossil fuels it is the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from other sources. He acknowledges them, but they have not taken the spotlight. There’s work to be done regarding manufacturing, agriculture, mining and other aspects of our industrialized global economy.

Every time I talk to an Iowa farmer Gore’s work can be heard in the conversation. Not so much from me, but from farmers. They’ll tell you the hydrology cycle seems different even if they dislike Al Gore and don’t acknowledge it is related to global warming. They don’t have to and I don’t need ratification of my own beliefs.

Like so many others I am focused on the work of mitigating the causes of climate change. You may not know it, but it is baked into everything I do.

What have you done lately to create a better environment for all of us to enjoy?

Posted in Climate Action, Climate Change, Environment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on What's After Paris?

Grassley Events In Harlan, Woodbine And Guthrie Center Next Week

Grassley Trump and the Courts

Grab an opportunity to ask Senator Grassley a question or two next week:

Shelby County Meeting
Wednesday, August 10, 2016
10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.
Shelby County Farm Bureau
908 6th Street
Harlan


Harrison County Meeting

Wednesday, August 10, 2016
2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m.
Main Street Station
303 Walker Street
Woodbine


Guthrie County Meeting

Thursday, August 11, 2016
10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.
Guthrie County Hospital
Conference Room 710
North 12th Street
Guthrie Center

Posted in Charles Grassley | Tagged | Comments Off on Grassley Events In Harlan, Woodbine And Guthrie Center Next Week

The Courtney Report: The Medicaid Mess

Courtney Report

This came in late last weekend, but is still quite relevant. Governor Branstad and his compadres have totally botched this transition in their haste to start funneling our tax money to their donors. This was, of course, a change that made no sense at all except as a way to funnel our tax money to private corporations.

“The Medicaid members are all fearful of losing any and all services. This has been one of the worst handled processes Iowa has been involved in!”
– Southeast Iowa organization that works with Medicaid recipients

Medicaid+Privatization

PROVIDERS SAY PRIVATE MEDICAID HURTS CARE

Iowa Medicaid providers are struggling under the Branstad-Reynolds privatization plan, according to a new survey.

The survey was completed by more than 400 doctors, hospitals, local clinics and non-profit health care providers. They have faced hurdles and headaches in providing high-quality care since Iowa’s $5 billion Medicaid program was privatized on April 1.

According the survey, Medicaid providers are seeing higher costs in running their businesses. For example:

* 90 percent say privatization has increased their administrative expenses
* 79 percent are not getting paid on time by the for-profit corporations now running Iowa Medicaid
* 28 percent have had to borrow money to pay their bills while waiting to be reimbursed by out-of- state Managed Care Organizations
* 66 percent say when they do get reimbursed, it’s at lower rates than agreed upon

The switch to private Medicaid has caused a significant hardship, according to one mental health center. “Our agency has had to take out loans and some staff have volunteered to go without pay for a couple of pay periods. This is all because the MCOs owe approximately $200,000 to us at this time… The MCOs were not at all prepared for what they took on in such a short time. We need help!!!!”

Those who completed the survey say services for Iowans on Medicaid will suffer because of privatization:

* 46 percent of providers are planning to reduce services
* 61 percent say privatization has reduced the quality of services they can provide
* 38 percent say Medicaid patients can no longer see their out-of-network specialty providers

One survey respondent said, “it has harmed our most vulnerable locally, as they now have little to no options for some services… and sometimes no local options at all….”

Iowa Medicaid is in a state of emergency. Iowa physicians may be forced to stop taking Medicaid patients or close their doors all together. That would be bad for the 560,000 elderly, disabled and low-income Iowans who rely on Medicaid.

For full survey results and to read the experiences of Iowa Medicaid providers in their own words, go to www.iowahouse.org/medicaidprovider.pdf.

“Getting advanced radiology exams approved is a confusing mess. My nurses are spending huge amounts of time fighting with insurance companies to get medications and MRI/CT scans approved. Patients are going without insulin because of long prior authorization times. What a mess!!!”

– Muscatine health care provider who sees Medicaid patients


VIGILANCE NEEDED WITH PRIVATE MEDICAID

Senate Democrats are listening and remain committed to addressing the difficulties private Medicaid has created for patients, health care providers and caregivers. We tried to prevent these problems when a bipartisan Senate majority voted to stop the transition to private Medicaid (SF 2125), but the Republican-controlled House refused to consider the bill.

Instead, we continue to hear from Iowans struggling to cut through the Medicaid red tape. Legislative Democrats have held help sessions in communities across the state to ensure they get the assistance and answers they need.

At these forums, Iowans with disabilities, caregivers, patient advocates and health care providers shared their frustrations with Governor Branstad’s privatized Medicaid.

The forums prepared legislators for a recent meeting of the Senate Human Resources Committee, where the Iowa Department of Human Services and Managed Care Organizations were asked what they’re doing to fix the ongoing Medicaid problems.

We must be vigilant about holding them accountable and insisting they do better by Iowa patients, health care providers and taxpayers. We will expect further updates and progress when the Health Policy Oversight Committee meets August 29 at the Statehouse.

Bipartisan Medicaid oversight legislation, approved as part of this year’s Health & Human Services Budget (HF 2460), will help in the push for improvements. It sets standards for Medicaid services to ensure patients get the care they need, and calls for expanded reporting on consumer protections, health outcomes and program integrity.

You can follow our efforts, find out about upcoming meetings and subscribe to Medicaid updates at www.senate.iowa.gov/democrats/Medicaid.
STATE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MORE LIMITED THAN EVER

Governor Branstad’s closing of Mental Health Institutes is taking its toll. Iowa is worst in the nation when it comes to the state’s ability to provide inpatient mental health treatment for our citizens.

According to the nonpartisan Treatment Advocacy Center, Iowa has only 64 state beds (down from 149 in 2010) for mental health patients—that’s two beds for every 100,000 Iowans – and most of them are already being used by inmates.

Iowans often have long waits to get the mental health services they need. Without treatment, many end up behind bars, which adds to the burden on our already strained corrections system.

The situation has gotten worse under Governor Branstad. He has shut down mental health institutes in Mt. Pleasant and Clarinda, the Iowa Juvenile Home in Toledo, and the Psychiatric Medical Institution for Children in Independence.

That leaves Iowa with about 731 mental health beds (public and private), not nearly enough to help Iowa children and adults with serious mental illnesses.

It’s a shame to lose successful, high-quality health care programs with skilled local caregivers who worked with Iowans in need. In the end, Iowans and Iowa tax dollars will be sent out of state for health care that had been provided close to home.

For more on the troubles states face when they don’t have enough psychiatric beds, see the 2016 report from the Treatment Advocacy Center.

Posted in Branstad, Courtney, Courtney Report, Republicn Policy | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Sunday Funday: Belated Happy Birthday, Mr. President

I love to relax with the Sunday Funday quiz!

I love to relax with the Sunday Funday quiz!

Fifty-five years ago last Thursday a baby boy was born in Kenya with plans to take over the most powerful country in the world within a scant 47 years. A birth notice was put in the Honolulu, Hawaii newspaper and a birth certificate created to give the future ruler citizenship in America. The planners of this incredible plot had even made sure that Hawaii would be a state before the child was born. Few details were left to chance.

Even though the child was black and at that time many of his race were not allowed to even vote in that country – the United States of America, the plan went forward. As the child grew and gained knowledge and grace and some basketball skills, those in charge of the nefarious plot made inroads into breaking down racial barriers. Into the 1980s the now young man was educated in some of the country’s best schools to establish credentials as he made his planned ascent into the highest office in the country.

In 2008, right on schedule the now adult Barack Obama won election as president as the country suffered through a major depression brought on by the manipulation of world economies by those plotting for Obama’s ascent. Obama has been in power for 7.5 years and appears ready to hand the reins of power over to a new president in January. But many know this is merely a ruse as his cabal plots the takeover of the US. We only need the reports from the agents that Donald Trump sent to Hawaii a couple of years ago to see how this plot will finally unfold. We expect that report soon. Reporters should be asking how soon we will see it.

Things I have learned on the inter-tubes. Happy belated birthday, Mr. President

Once again, what a week. I am so curious how the Onion stays in business when reality is so much stranger than much of what they write. Can we keep Trump’s name out this week?

1) “I’ve seen it raining fire in the sky” goes the John Denver song. What astronomical delight takes place this week? (it has already started BTW)

2) Once again Donald Trump sees things no one else does. What did he claim to have seen last week that he could not have possibly seen.

3) Donald Trump and Mike Pence split on endorsing what Republican candidate for reelection?

4) August 6th, 1945 Hiroshima became the first victim of an atomic bomb. Approximately how many were estimated to have died immediately or later from that bomb?

5) What billionaire offered to release his tax returns if Donald Trump would?

6) The mosquitoes that carry the zika virus have been identified in the US in what state?

7) The mother with a son in the Air Force was booed at a rally for whom last week?

8) August 10th, 1874 what future president who would preside over a world wide depression was born?

9) Roger Stone, advisor to Donald Trump predicts what will happen if the election is “stolen” from Trump?

10) The small Iowa town of Arcadia garnered national attention with a parade float that featured who in jail?

11) Rep. Richard Hanna of NY got his name in the news when he became the first Republican in congress to do what?

12) Scientists found a potential antibiotic to act on the superbug MRSA where?

13) August 8 & 9, 1974. The US seemed to almost stop as what ongoing national drama came to a decisive end?

14) What former CEO of Hewlitt-Packard and California gubernatorial candidate said she would support Hillary Clinton this fall?

15) Amid political strife and many questions concerning health and safety of participants, what major international event kicked off Friday night?

16) As the Republicans claim the economy is in the toilet how many jobs were created in July?

17) Donald Trump held a rally in Green Bay, Wisc. Friday. What 3 Wisconsonites were too busy to attend?

18) Republican Party officials are scrambling to figure out what to do in case of what unprecedented action by their presidential nominee?

19) George Zimmerman was in the news last week as what happened when he was bragging about killing Trayvon Martin in a Florida restaurant?

20) Apparently Trump doesn’t have a binder of women like Mitt did. Who did Trump float as a potential female member of his cabinet?

State Fair Time!!! Starts next Thursday. Will be held in the usual place!

Answers:

1) the annual Perseid meteor shower which will peak Thursday and Friday.

2) The US handing $400 million in cash to Iran

3) Paul Ryan (the freaking Speaker of the House!)

4) ~205,000

5) Warren Buffet

6) Florida

7) Mike Pence

8) Iowa’s own Herbert Hoover

9) “a bloodbath” looks like we’d better let Trump win, folks

10) Hillary Clinton. Children were encouraged to throw water balloons at Clinton

11) endorse Hillary Clinton

12) in the human nose

13) Watergate. President Nixon announced his resignation on August 8th in a nationally televised address and he resigned at noon on the 9th.

14) Meg Whitman

15) The Rio Olympics

16) 250,000

17) Gov. Scott Walker, Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Ron Johnson

18) what to do if he quits before the election

19) someone came over and punched him in the mouth

20) his daughter Ivanka

Now it appears that presidential debates may be in jeopardy as the Trump camp quibbles with the schedule.

float in Arcadia Iowa parade. (credit to the Carroll Times Herald)

float in Arcadia Iowa parade. (credit to the Carroll Times Herald)

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Belated Happy Birthday, Mr. President

RELEASE: Response To Grassley Campaign Repeatedly Singling Out Progress Iowa

Still backing Trump

Still backing Trump

(Editor’s note: Like so many Republicans, when the going gets tough Republicans look for someone to blame their problems on. Progress Iowa has merely pointed out a practice that the Grassley camp has practiced for several years. Progress Iowa did not tell the Grassley camp to avoid open meetings in populous counties, nor did they tell him to obstruct federal court appointments nor did they tell him to sign the letter to the Iranian government last year)

Friday 12:14 PM
www.ProgressIowa.org

For Immediate Release: July 26, 2016

Response To Grassley Campaign Repeatedly Singling Out Progress Iowa

DES MOINES – Progress Iowa’s executive director, Matt Sinovic, released the following statement in response to Senator Grassley’s campaign repeatedly singling out the organization:

“Senator Chuck Grassley’s campaign doesn’t seem to appreciate being held responsible for the Supreme Court obstruction or Grassley’s private scheduling that avoids Iowa’s largest counties. In a public statement, Grassley’s campaign manager attacked Progress Iowa as an ‘outside group’ campaigning against him. Actually, we represent tens of thousands of Iowans who are fed up with Grassley’s Supreme Court obstruction, now the longest in all of American history. And we’ve been advocating for years that Grassley stop delaying judicial nominations at all levels. We also will continue to highlight how Grassley routinely avoids public meetings in major Iowa cities – not holding a single public 99 county tour event in eight of the ten largest counties for the past six years.

Just because Senator Grassley doesn’t like the facts doesn’t mean we won’t stop talking about them.”

Background: Story from yesterday referencing Progress Iowa

Using Progress Iowa in a fundraising letter

Posted in Charles Grassley, Progress Iowa | Tagged , | Comments Off on RELEASE: Response To Grassley Campaign Repeatedly Singling Out Progress Iowa

Is Kansas’ Primary A Harbinger Of This Fall?

Whats-the-Matter-with-Kansas-film-images-86dcf80b-678f-43fb-8b82-f78787e5224

In case you missed it, Kansas held primary elections for state and congressional offices last Tuesday. Kansas has always been a Republican mainstay. Even President Obama stated in his address to the Democratic Convention that his grandparents from Kansas were probably “Republicans – party of Lincoln.”

In recent years as corporate media, especially the right wing radio machine, has pushed the Republican party further and after to political territories never before explored in America. The result has been a narrower and narrower range of acceptable candidates and responses to issues. As the the range has gotten narrower it has gotten more extreme. The extremeness shows up both in social policies and fiscal policies.

As the Republicans have scampered to the right, Kansas has been one of the leaders in the country in embracing more and more extremist policies. The governor of Kansas, Sam Brownback, has been a true adherent to the supply side economics of Ronald Reagan as proffered by Milton Friedman.

Brownback took over five years ago five years ago. That was the beginning of a downward spiral that led to Tuesday backlash against policies that have made Kansas a pauper among states. The key to their current situation is huge tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations that the supply side economics of Milton Friedman claims will then lead to good times as the wealthy trickle down their savings to us unwashed masses. Such a trickle down is not happening in Kansas just as it has not happened anywhere else.

So Kansas has lurched from one constitutional crisis to another (read much more here) since Brownback and an extreme right wing legislature has put supply side economics into effect. Things seem to be coming to a head as these policies have even led to the potential of not opening schools this year.

Slowly it appears that citizens are finally getting totally fed up with these extreme policies that vastly favor the rich with the expectation that the rich will then, from the goodness of their hearts, take care of some of the social aspects of government as jobs proliferate. None of this happens as the rich get richer and sit on their money.

Last fall Louisiana elected a Democrat as governor which is unheard of. Tuesday in Kansas some of the most extreme of the tea party Republicans were sent packing when they lost their primaries to supposedly more moderate candidates. Most notable was congress member Tim Huelskamp who has been instrumental in making the US House into the totally dysfunctional body it is today. Along with Huelskamp, the extreme wing of the Republican party lost 10 of 16 state senate races including the senate majority leader. In the state house only six of 97 sitting republicans lost their seats. While Republicans will most likely win their races in Kansas, there seems to be a move to moderation.

While this is no revolution, it is a clear indication that the insanity of Republican policies is finally running its course. Every dam burst starts with a trickle.

Will this emerging trend have any effect in Iowa this fall? With a toxic candidate at the head of the party in Donald Trump there may be less ballots in Iowa voting straight party Republican. Given more more vote splitting, there is always the chance that voters will be doing more than just a cursory glance at the issues this fall.

Terry Branstad has not helped his party at the state level with his unilateral takeover of Iowa’s Medicaid system that seems to be fulfilling Iowans worst nightmares. Of course Branstad and his Republican colleagues will not back down on this issue. To them it is more important that corporations get a huge state payoff than that the services be the best possible.

Medicaid privatization coupled with the gradual dismantling of education in Iowa and water quality issues that Republicans refuse to address could lead to the beginning of the removal of some of the extremist elements of the Iowa legislature.

The Iowa senate has kept many of the extreme bills put forward by the Iowa House from becoming law. With a governor who is a founding member of ALEC, Iowa is but 2 seats in the senate from becoming another Kansas. We need to work to keep the senate Democratic and to turn the Iowa House this fall.

One factor that plays heavily in Kansas state elections is Koch brother money. Iowa races have been getting some of that Koch brother money filtering into races in previous years. Expect more this year as the Kochs are not spending at the presidential level and thus have much more money to inject into state races. It is a given that they will be sticking their noses into our business.

Posted in 2016 Election Campaign, Trump | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Is Kansas’ Primary A Harbinger Of This Fall?

Pathetic Response From Grassley, Ernst On Trump Statements

grassley

Much like the current leader of their party, Donald Trump, Iowa’s senators, Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, no longer seem to have a limit on how low they can go.

Trump crossed – no just plain busted through – one of the very sacred lines in politics in America when he criticized the family of a soldier who died in battle. The Trump campaign then went even lower when some of its surrogates tried to tie Khzir Khan to terrorist organizations. As far as I know the campaign has not disavowed these statements yet.

Any politician worth their salt (love those old sayings) should have immediately and forcefully condemned the Trump statements. They should also have at that time withdrawn any support for those who made such statements until apologies and retractions were made. There have been but a few Republican politicians who have made a statement condemning Trump. There have been only a few who have withdrawn support.

For the Republican Party since Reagan, party comes before country.

Which brings us to Iowa’s senior senator Chuck Grassley. This is a man who should have immediately condemned Trump’s statements in a forceful manner. As a senior politician, Grassley’s words would have carried some major weight. Yet Grassley was slow in saying anything. When his office did release a statement late Monday – 5 days after Trump’s statements – it was a milk toast statement:

“Mr. Trump’s comments are not in line with my own beliefs about how the members of the military and their families should be treated, and respect for the people who serve our country is something both presidential campaigns could use more of,” said Grassley.

Hardly the tough condemnation Trump deserved. When I called Grassley’s office Monday afternoon I asked why the Senator had not made a statement by then. The staffer stated that they didn’t realize it was such a big issue. Calls had just started coming in Monday. Talk about tone deaf.

Grassley had to be told this was wrong and a big deal? Wow!

Senator Ernst’s office released an even milder comment:

In response to a request for comment Sen. Joni Ernst, a Red Oak Republican and a former officer in the Iowa National Guard with combat experience during her 23-year military career, said: “We as a nation are incredibly grateful to Capt. Khan’s service and ultimate sacrifice – as well as the sacrifices of his parents – to keep us safe and free. We must always honor our veterans, and their families; many have endured far more than we can ever imagine, and we must always remember to express our gratitude.”

Seems like our senators – both of whom may someday vote to send our sons and daughters to war – were not terrifically upset by Trump’s statement. Ernst’s statement even avoids the reason why she would be issuing such a statement.

Patty Judge’s campaign in an email calling for Grassley to be taken to task for his lack of response to Trump stated:

Chuck Grassley has stood by while Donald Trump has insulted women, minorities, Americans with disabilities, and now he remains soft as his endorsed presidential candidate levies vile attacks on the family of a fallen veteran. By not standing up and loudly condemning these bigoted remarks, Senator Grassley is choosing loyalty to D.C. Republicans and Donald Trump over loyalty to Iowa values like respect, decency, and defending the honor of America’s fallen and their families. The fact that he hasn’t already demanded that Trump apologize shows just how much the 42 years in Washington have changed Chuck Grassley — and not for the better.

Grassley needs to know that Iowans want their elected officials to strongly stand up to Donald Trump’s constant racist and sexist remarks, not stand idly by with weak, tepid responses every time. Let’s send a message to Grassley that he MUST denounce Donald Trump immediately:

I’m proud of my husband’s service, my father’s service, all Americans who have served, and heroes like Captain Humayun Khan, a soldier who sacrificed his own life to save the lives of other American soldiers. The Chuck Grassley that Iowans knew for years wouldn’t hesitate to join me in calling for Donald Trump to publicly acknowledge that his comments were disgraceful and immediately apologize.

Trump’s attack of the gold star family raises two major questions:

First: Is there no place Republicans will not go to gain power?

Second: Throughout our country’s existence sending our sons and daughters to war has been the most serious question all of our presidents have ever faced. All who have presided over war years speak of the anguish of committing troops. Donald Trump seems to view it as no more serious than sending your kids to camp. So your kid gets killed? Well, Donald Trump has his problems, too.

Trump doesn’t seem to understand what war is nor what military personnel and their families endure, nor does he seem to care. Captain Khan died in a war of choice, a war that did not need to happen. Donald Trump could easily get us into that situation again.

Posted in Charles Grassley, Joni Ernst, Patty Judge, Republicn Policy, Trump | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Hiroshima Day 2016

Hiroshima, Japan after U.S. Nuclear Attack. Photo Credit: The Telegraph

Hiroshima, Japan after U.S. Nuclear Attack. Photo Credit: The Telegraph

The Washington, D.C. rumor mill is saying President Barack Obama may “do something” about nuclear weapons before the end of his term.

Among ideas being discussed are early retirement of some of the non-deployed weapons in the arsenal; declaration of a no first use policy; or taking weapons off hair-trigger alert.

The arms control community is pushing for no first use policy, but whatever — any Obama action to reduce the threat of a nuclear weapons exchange near the end of his presidency would be welcome, and largely symbolic.

Saturday, Aug. 6, marks seventy-one years since the United States dropped the first of two nuclear weapons on Japan.

When the Enola Gay dropped “Little Boy” over an unsuspecting Hiroshima, it killed between 60,000 and 80,000 people immediately with a total death toll estimated at 135,000. The bombing of Nagasaki occurred three days later. Men, women and children were killed indiscriminately.

President Harry Truman made the decision to use the bomb. In the end, he had no questions or regrets. Truman believed in the larger picture of World War II, a conflict in which tens of millions of people lost their lives, dropping the bomb would save lives. More than seven decades later we continue to debate whether bombing Hiroshima was necessary or played any significant role in ending the war.

After signing the New START Treaty with Russia, which entered into force in February 2011, the U.S. Congress embarked on a nuclear weapons modernization process expected to spend as much as $1 trillion over the next 30 years. That’s a lot of money for a weapons system we hope never to use.

What’s an Iowan to do? My friend and colleague Peter Wilk speaks for many of us.

Calling for “No First Use” of Nuclear Weapons
Submitted to the Brunswick (Maine) Times Record

This August 6th and 9th we are once again reminded of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed an estimated 200,000 women, men and children. This past May, President Obama was the first President to visit the site and to commemorate the bombing victims.

While in Hiroshima, President Obama declared, “Among those nations like my own that hold nuclear stockpiles, we must have the courage to escape the logic of fear and pursue a world without them.” Thousands of members and supporters of Physicians for Social Responsibility completely agree.

Although most of us would rather not think about it, the U.S. and Russia continue to have thousands of nuclear warheads deployed on hundreds of missiles, bombers and submarines. We and the Russians keep over 1,000 of them on so-called “launch on warning” status. These warheads can be launched within minutes and reach their targets around the world within thirty minutes, putting millions of innocent civilians at risk in each of our countries.

The recent military uprising in Turkey reminds us just how unstable our current situation is, with 50 of our nuclear weapons stored in a U.S. airbase there. This airbase was surrounded and cut-off during the most unstable period of that coup attempt.

Perhaps most frightening is that the U.S. maintains a policy of threatening to be the first to use nuclear weapons in a future conflict. Combining this policy with our “launch on warning” stance sets the stage for a potential nuclear war initiated out of fear, anger, miscalculation or accident.

These horrific weapons threaten our own national security rather than enhance it. They are unusable in any meaningful sense of the word, given the global disruption to the world’s climate, food supply and economy that would result. At the same time, they have no value in countering terrorists or cyber-attacks.

Fortunately there are also some positive developments upon which to build. 127 countries have taken the Humanitarian Pledge calling for elimination of nuclear weapons. As a result, the United Nations established an Open-Ended Working Group that has begun meeting to discuss the most promising next steps toward a treaty to ban nuclear weapons around the world.

Meanwhile, the potential humanitarian impact of any use of nuclear weapons is so overwhelming that we in the U.S. must pull ourselves back from the brink by taking an easy step of our own. Since these weapons are in reality unusable, the U.S. should minimize their role in our military planning. President Obama can and should declare that the U.S. is adopting a “no first use” policy – pledging to never again be the first nation to launch nuclear weapons against another.

The U.S led the world into the nuclear age. Now it’s time to lead the world beyond it – to move to safer national security strategies that do not put all that we care about at risk, under the false premise that threatening to use nuclear weapons against others can protect us.

President Obama – your legacy and our lives are at stake. Please complete your presidency by taking a meaningful step to reduce nuclear risks by initiating a “no first use” policy.

On this 71st anniversary of the destruction of Hiroshima, let us all pledge “never again” and commit ourselves to do what we can to help make progress toward a world free of nuclear weapons.

Peter Wilk, MD
Physicians for Social Responsibility — Maine

It’s time to prevent what we cannot cure, and abolish nuclear weapons.

Posted in Nuclear Abolition, Nuclear Disarmament | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Hiroshima Day 2016

Plasma Sales And Iowa Politics

get money out of politics(EDITOR’S NOTE: This post was written for On Our Own: Sustainability in a Turbulent World in 2013 and has been corrected and updated). The Cumulus radio station in Cedar Rapids was advertising how a person could earn up to $340 per month selling their plasma. It’s enough to make it worth a look to see if plasma sales could fit into our budgetary bottom line. Sounds kind of grim, but people do it all the time.

Plasma is the pale, yellow liquid portion of blood that helps our bodies control bleeding and infection. When one donates plasma, blood is removed and the plasma separated and saved before being returned to our body. We generate more plasma within a couple of days so twice a week donations are usually possible.

Donating takes about an hour and plasma collection centers make it easy with a straight forward, step-by-step process. They explain how payment is loaded on a debit card. It is literally using one’s body as an ATM.

Several self-employed and low-wage earners in my circle use plasma sales to supplement monthly income. Got a toothache? Better schedule some sessions at the plasma center to get cash to pay the dentist. One suspects residents of our nearby college town use the cash for cigarettes, salty snacks, sugary drinks and alcohol, but in any case, plasma sales can be a reliable and steady source of income if one meets the requirements for donating.

Plasma money could be put to good use. For example, it could be used for political donations. That way, when a political telemarketer called, knowing my annual budget, I could say, “Yes. I’ll donate $100, which will take me four plasma sessions.” Politics would literally be based on blood money then.

We could go a step further and say that all financial contributions to politicians had to originate in plasma sales. There would be a natural limit to how much a person could donate, and a restriction could be placed on corporations that said something like, corporations can make political contributions, but such contributions must be paid via the plasma of shareholders, imposing a reasonable and well-defined limit to corporate money spent on political campaigns. I bet corporations would exercise their “free speech” differently under such a rule.

If my modest proposal about political contributions seems a bit edgy, I am pretty sure it would work. Having skin in the game would take on a whole new meaning.

Most Americans are asleep at the wheel of politics, and would not contribute, so there is little danger of a glut of plasma on the market.

If times get tough, I’ll re-visit adding a plasma sales income line to our household operating budget. For now, I’m just glad I don’t have to do it.

Posted in money out of politics | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Plasma Sales And Iowa Politics