Letter: Miller-Meeks Motion To Dismiss Is Self Serving

Letter to the editor in the Clinton Herald

Mariannette Miller-Meeks filed a motion to dismiss Rita Hart’s election contest despite the fact that there are 22 legal ballots currently excluded from the election results.

Hart’s Notice of Contest details 22 ballots that were unfairly excluded from the IA-02 election and proves that including these ballots would change the outcome of this election.

Dismissing the contest would mean knowingly disenfranchising these 22 voters.

Miller-Meeks’s motion to dismiss not only minimizes the importance of counting every vote, it provides no legal grounds to dispute Hart’s claim to victory. The motion to dismiss never disputes the legitimacy of the 22 excluded ballots, suggesting that Miller-Meeks and her lawyers see no legal reason for their exclusion. An election contest is taken up if there is evidence that would change the results of the election and result in the contestant’s claim to the seat.

Hart’s contest provides evidence of legal ballots currently excluded from the election that, if included in the election results, would deem her the winner. With no legal support, Miller-Meeks’s motion to dismiss is just a self-serving attempt to silence Iowans and keep her provisional seat in Congress.

We deserve better than this. None of us deserve to be wrongfully disenfranchised. Hart is not asking for a baseless recount, she is asking for the assurance that every Iowan’s voice is heard.

Allison Ritchie, Muscatine

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Letter: Miller-Meeks Motion To Dismiss Is Self Serving

All Iowa House Republicans Voted Against Covid Relief

Action alert from Senator Rob Hogg:

Iowans Need the Covid Relief Bill!

[BFIA Editor’s note:  All Republican representatives from Iowa Ashley Hinson, Randy Feenstra and Marianette Miller-Meeks voted AGAINST Covid relief. Democrat Cindy Axne voted FOR the relief bill.]

Call Senator Grassley (202-224-3744)
and Senator Ernst (202-224-3254) today!

Dear Iowans:

On Saturday, the U.S. House passed the American Rescue Plan/Covid Relief Bill that will fund vaccines, provide $1,400 payments to Iowans making less than $75,000 a year, and increase the child tax credit. (Thank you, Representative Cindy Axne!)

Now Iowans need the U.S. Senate to pass that bill to help stop the coronavirus and to help Iowans who have been suffering its economic consequences.

We need every vote possible to pass this bill as quickly as possible.

Today, I am calling Senator Grassley and Senator Ernst to tell them Iowans need this bill and to ask for their support. Phone numbers below. I hope you will call, too.

I know some of you will think, “Well, they don’t listen so I’m not going to call.” I share your disappointment with many of their past votes, but please call to give them the chance to support this bill. If you don’t call to make your voice heard, who else will?

Be polite, tell the person who answers your name and that you are an Iowan, give them your address, and tell them that Iowans need this bill and you want the Senators to vote for it. Boom. Done in ten minutes or less.

Then invite your Iowa friends to call, too. Forward this email. Post on social media. Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.

Here are the phone numbers to call – please call until you get through:

Senator Grassley
DC: (202) 224-3744
Council Bluffs: (712) 322-7103
Sioux City: (712) 233-1860
Waterloo: (319) 232-6657
Cedar Rapids: (319) 363-6832
Davenport: (563) 322-4331
Des Moines: (515) 288-1145

Senator Ernst
DC: (202) 224-3254
Council Bluffs: (712)352-1167
Sioux City: (712) 252-1550
Cedar Rapids: (319) 365-4504
Davenport: (563) 322-0677
Des Moines: (515) 284-4574

Key Provisions of the Bill

Here are the key provisions of the bill that you can highlight if you want when you call:

> Funding for vaccine production and distribution.
> $1,400 payments to Iowans making less than $75,000 a year, $150,000 for couples.
> Increase the child tax credit which experts say will cut child poverty in half.
> Public health assistance to help schools open safely.
> Paid leave for workers who get coronavirus to help stop the spread.
> Extended unemployment benefits.
> Aid to local governments so they aren’t forced to reduce police or other essential services.

Don’t let the opponents mislead you about this bill. They are wrong when they say it isn’t about coronavirus relief or dealing with its economic consequences. This bill is about helping stop the virus and helping Americans who have suffered economically from the virus.

Here is a link to a good thread on Twitter about what’s in the bill from U.S. Rep. Sean Casten of Downers Grove, Illinois:
https://twitter.com/SeanCasten/status/1365687238084993024

If you want to let me know when you have made the call, or if you have other thoughts or suggestions, just reply to SenatorRobHogg@gmail.com.

Rob

Senator Rob Hogg
Cedar Rapids
Telephone: (319) 247-0223
Email: SenatorRobHogg@gmail.com
Twitter: @SenatorRobHogg
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hoggforsenate/
Rob Hogg is a State Senator from Cedar Rapids. Contact Rob at SenatorRobHogg@gmail.com.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on All Iowa House Republicans Voted Against Covid Relief

Bolkcom: Iowa Republicans “Settling Scores”

The League of Women Voters of Johnson County hosted a legislative forum this weekend.   Present are Representatives Kevin Kinney, Mary Mascher, Joe Bolkcom, Dave Jacoby, Christina Bohannan and Zach Wahls.  Bobby Kaufmann was absent. Great discussion plus questions.  Sobering opening statements on how they are experiencing the Republican extremism this session and their hopes for minimizing the damage.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bolkcom: Iowa Republicans “Settling Scores”

“DePlatformed?” Us Too!

As if I needed yet another chuckle over how badly conservatives are treated in this country, I almost drove off the road laughing when I heard the news on public radio Friday and some Republican Iowa legislators were whining about being “deplatformed” by social media.

My understanding is that social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tic-Toc and others are now monitoring posts to their websites (or platforms) for things like flat out lies, violent content and calls to arms. The concern of these platforms is pretty simple and logical – if someone commits a crime and they claim they got the idea from a post on Twitter, should Twitter be held accountable for allowing that information to get out to the general public?

As far as I know right now there is no specific answer one way or another. There are some state legislators who would like to make social platforms complicit in crimes if a platform were used to disseminate ideas among members of a group for instance. Much of the planning and co-ordination of the far right wing attack on Washington DC on January 6th was done on social media as very obvious example.

With potential legislation geared to make them liable for what users of their platforms use the platform for, social media has begun to crack down what they will allow users to say on their platforms. Ironically, the crack down seems to be falling hardest on the right. Seems that much of what they post fail the new tests that social media platforms have developed to screen content that is too violent or racist or whatever other categories they have decided to screen for.

Now folks on the right are screaming that the social media platforms are censoring them and taking away their “free speech” rights. Folks, if your postings are being blocked because of content, you really need to review the rules and then measure your content against those rules. Most likely your content has crossed a line.

If you do not like the limits that social media platforms have imposed on content then there are some things you can do. Crying about “free speech” is not one of them. The first amendment pertains only to the government. It does not pertain to Google, Facebook, twitter, Tic-Toc or for that matter radio, TV and newspapers.

All those platforms named above are private entities. As such they are not bound by the first amendment to allow any nutcase a platform for their rantings. And as we now see many folks in government want them to police the content that are posted to their platforms. For some reason Americans seem to think that the internet should be a place where anything and everything goes. It isn’t. While maybe not as regulated yet as other platforms, that will probably be coming.

In order to save their butts from possible lawsuits or even legal charges, platforms have decided to pre-actively screen content. Right now, much of the content that violates their restrictions comes from the right. While they act as if this is “Big Tech” somehow censoring conservatives, I am sure it is “Big Tech” just trying to save its own ass from future trouble. And it looks like the ones that will get them into trouble will be the conservatives.

However, liberals have been subject to a de facto form of what would now be called deplatforming  over the past 40 years since the fairness doctrine was declared no longer valid under Saint Ronald of Reagan. That, couple with major changes in ownership rules on how much media could be owned by one group and we had the groundwork laid for a huge conservative takeover of the media of the day – radio, TV, newspapers and magazines.

The hangover from all that is still with us. For those who follow blogforiowa, you know that media bias is one of our favorite topics. That is because we believe that the media that comes into Iowans homes daily greatly affects how we vote. In Iowa we have NO liberal media and very little non-partisan media. In the past 20 years this has helped move Iowa further and further right as a state.

If you are still with us, name the liberal newspapers in Iowa? I can’t think of any inside Iowa’s borders or any close by for that matter. Iowa’s newspapers seem to run the gamut from right to far right.

What about liberal Iowa radio stations? I come up with another fat 0 here. Right wing radio up and down the dial, though. NPR stations are at best to the right of neutral. If you care. Minneapolis and Chicago do have left wing radio.

And TV stations in Iowa – any to the left? Not that I have heard of. 

So the tears of the “deplatformed conservative” is yet another attention seeking whiner who is crying when that which he or she has been doing to others for decades is somehow turned and focused on themselves.

Hey conservative, can we talk about the fairness doctrine? Or do you like the way the playing is so greatly tilted in your favor?

Posted in media, Media Bias, Republican hypocrisy, Republican Policy | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on “DePlatformed?” Us Too!

Sunday Funday: Biden On Fire Edition

President Biden remembers 500,000 dead of Covid-19 (3 minutes):

What can you say? One month in and the far right wing Republicans are already declaring that Biden has failed his first hundred days in the first thirty. That’s because they know that if Biden gets to use that other 70 days of his first hundred days, people will be wondering whatever happened to that other party, whatever their names were.

As Black History month ends,  Women’s History month begins. To bring those two together with Biden’s enormous run out of the gate, let me mention this: Sometime in March (date to be announced) President Biden will give an address to a joint session of congress. This will not be an official State of the Union address but will look like one.

When Biden gives that address, as always the two folks behind him will be the next two in line for the presidency. This year there will be some major differences between the people who usually fill those seats and those who will be filling them this year.

In the place of what were normally two white, Christian males we will find one 80 year old white female San Francisco liberal and one half SE Asian / Black female, also liberal. Take a good look America. The times, they are a-changin’.

We seem to have lost track of that one guy – you know, the guy who tried to overthrow the government. Where’d he go?

  1. “100 million doses in 100 days.” boasted the incoming Biden Administration. Thursday, some 36 days into the new administration, what milestone dose was delivered?
  1. Taxes? You want to see taxes? How many pages of Trump’s taxes were turned over to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance last week?
  1. Republicans pull out their old tried and true maneuver of alleging sexual misconduct by a major Democratic politician. This time it is what governor?
  1. President Biden ordered flags flown at half staff as America surpassed what sad milestone?
  1. The Senate Justice Committee is holding hearings on Merrick Garland’s appointment as AG. What Senator refused to give Garland hearings when he was nominated for the SCOTUS?
  1. Kim Reynolds continues to play amateur hour with Covid vaccinations. As of Friday Iowa has a new website that will feature what?
  1. With the US Senate divided 50-50, which Democratic Senator is leveraging his power as the much needed 50th vote?
  1. March 1, 1781 America begins its national government under what newly ratified rules?
  1. Republicans in the Iowa legislature last week rushed through a bill concerning what as if their very lives depended on it?
  1. In Florida, Governor Ron De Santis ordered flags flown at half-staff in memory of what?
  1. US Special Envoy for Climate John Kerry said the earth had only how long to change course to avert the worst consequences of climate change?
  1. The first woman to make a real run at the presidency within today’s two party system was what congress woman from New York?
  1. Unsurprisingly, Republicans are attacking what Biden nominee for Interior Secretary?
  1. Next week, we expect a House vote on HR 1, a bill that would strengthen many provisions of what process that Republicans are weakening state by state?
  1. Over in South Dakota citizens are irate that what state official who killed a man he struck on the side of the road was only charged with a misdemeanor?
  1. President Biden has nominated 3 members to what group in what appears to be an effort to oust Louis DeJoy?
  1. President Biden held a virtual meeting with what close ally, vowing to renew relations?
  1. Covid-19 vaccinations will get a big boost as what company’s vaccine was endorsed by the FDA for emergency approval last week?
  1. What premiere athlete suffered possible career ending injuries as the car he drove was involved in a one car roll over accident in California?
  1. What woman is now due again to have her picture on US currency?

A million years ago I worked for Enron and I tried to explain the business model to my dad and when I was done he said “that sounds like check kiting” and I rolled my eyes because DADS and I figured I hadn’t explained it correctly but it turns out I nailed it. – Deborah Scaramastra tweet

Answers:

  1. 50 millionth – they are ahead of schedule
  1. 1 million
  1. Cuomo of New York
  1. 500,000 dead of covid
  1. Chuck Grassley
  1. Places that might have vaccines. Not a place to set up appointments
  1. Joe Manchin of West Virginia
  1. The Articles of Confederation
  1. Voting suppression
  1. Rush Limbaugh. Several state agencies refused the order.
  1. 9 years
  1. Shirley Chisholm
  1. Deb Haaland
  1. Voting rights
  1. The Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg
  1. He nominated 3 members to the USPS Board of Governors. With those 3 + 2 leftovers liberals should have a 5 to 4 voting majority
  1. Justin Trudeau of Canada
  1. Johnson and Johnson
  1. Tiger Woods
  1. Harriet Tubman on the $20

For four years Trump got away with lying hour after hour, day after day, degrading the capacity of millions and millions to know the truth. Now Republicans are continuing to get TV bookings to lie about the election, a sign of media failure that must stop.– Michael Beschloss

Posted in Covid-19, Humor | Comments Off on Sunday Funday: Biden On Fire Edition

What Could Possibly Be Next?

In my formative years I was an avid reader of the Des Moines Register’s Donald Kaul. His column ran on the editorial page of the paper three times a week. When football was no longer being played and the corn had not yet started to grow for the year the entertainment in Iowa was Donald Kaul versus the state legislature.

From January to May or June, Kaul would slice and dice crackpots in the legislature who would come up with some truly goofball ideas to deal with the problems of the day. The legislatures were usually Republican, the governor was usually Republican. 

The foe for the legislature in those day was most often those belligerent and unruly students and faculty especially in Iowa City who would often mock and oppose the brilliance of our legislative genii. The disrespect shown by those at the university was totally unacceptable to our legislature. This was also the time of the Viet Nam War. The university, especially the branch in Iowa City, had little respect for that war either.

Iowa’s Representatives and Senators would scheme as they could to try to bring students and faculty into line. My memory is foggy, but I seem to remember a threat to end tenure for faculty as one way to make the faculty a bit less rebellious and more compliant to their employers. 

That was 50 years back. Donald Kaul would win the battles, but the legislature would win the wars, often just with threats. Fifty years later, with almost no real politically activity going on, the legislature has once again picked the universities as their foe this year along with Iowa’s voters. 

At a time when Republicans hold nearly every elected office in the state the Republican led legislature and the Republican legislature seem to be on a vendetta because – why? There is still a state office they don’t control? Donald Trump didn’t get 100% of Iowa’s vote? There is still a scattering of Democratic legislators?

So at a time when the pandemic continues to ravage the state, our governor couldn’t run a kindergarten class let alone a vaccine program, Iowans are starving and real plans need to be created and assessed for  recovery, our legislature wastes it’s time on revenge on Iowa’s voters and universities.

Major order of business this week was to rush through an austere voter suppression plan because of fear that an election might break out in the next month or so. Heaven knows if it does, Democratic vote should be suppressed which is what the goal is.

We have all heard the various parts of this bill. There is one part I find interesting and hope that it will backfire. This part says that if you miss a general election (what is a general election, BTW?) you go on a watch list. If you miss another GE you lose your vote. So I hope every Democratic activist will emphasize that if you don’t vote, you could lose it.

As to the continuing War on the Universities, we have the double threat of doing away with tenure and having the faculty reveal their party of choice. I would think the reaction to the loss of tenure for most any faculty member would be to start sending out those resumes as quickly as possible. One thing that tenure does is to keep outside meddlers from interfering with research. One could certainly expect meddlers like legislators to start nosing around if they suspect politically unwanted research.

After all, the legislature also wants faculty to register their party affiliation. If that doesn’t scream out that the legislature plans on meddling with some sort of political balancing act, I don’t know what does. Supposedly the reason is because conservative speech is suppressed on campus. Suppressed I guess because there are too many liberals on campuses? 

My guess is that not being popular is being interpreted as suppressed. Unless listening to conservatives speak is required for graduation (and someday it may be) conservatives will not draw a crowd.

But now to the purpose of my little exercise here – could it get worse? OF COURSE IT COULD!

Down in Kansas, the U of Kansas will be eliminating their Humanities program. While there may be some fiscal reasons for doing so, cutting the Humanities which is the core around which many universities were built seems to be a blow against the mission of a school.

On the vote ‘manipulation’ side we have Arizona checking in with a couple of legislators introducing bills that could move the selection of the actual presidential electors away from being connected to the citizens votes and into the hands of the state legislature:   

Arizona lawmakers are debating a new set of voting bills — including one that would allow lawmakers to review election results “if needed” and would grant the legislature the power to pick the state’s presidential electors — as Republican lawmakers around the country work to change election laws in the wake of the 2020 election.

Remember that the Arizona electors bill is in reaction to Trump’s massive lie. For that matter Iowa’s new voter suppression laws are based on the same lie. 

This makes judgment as one of the most important characteristics for those who make our laws. If they can’t realize that Trump’s claim of a rigged election is bullshit with mountains of evidence to show it is a lie, then that person does not have the basic judgment to be making laws.

Posted in Iowa legislature 2021, Republican Policy, University of Iowa, voter suppression | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Legislative Forums – Today And Next Month

After last week’s show of power by Iowa’s Republican legislators there are probably lots of citizens who are feeling they have something to say to their legislator. 

These are zoom meetings. Click on the link and it will take you to the website. Be courteous, please. The origin of this list is here – https://www.infonetiowa.org/calendar/events/

February 2021

02/27/2021 8:00 AM – 10:00 AM Eggs & Issues – Rock Rapids

02/27/2021 8:00 AM – 9:00 AM Legislative Forum – Shenandoah

02/27/2021 8:30 AM – 9:30 AM Eggs & Issues – Oskaloosa

02/27/2021 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM Eggs & Issues – Spencer

02/27/2021 9:30 AM – 11:00 AM Legislative Coffee – Clinton/DeWitt

02/27/2021 9:30 AM – 11:30 AM Legislative Forum – Johnson County

02/27/2021 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM Talk with Officials – Urbandale

02/27/2021 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM Legislative Forum – Clarinda

02/27/2021 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM Town Hall – Sioux City

02/27/2021 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM Legislative Coffee – Harlan

02/27/2021 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM Legislative Forum – Mount Ayr

March 2021

03/01/2021 8:00 AM – 10:30 AM Matris Morning Coffee – Des Moines

03/02/2021 8:00 AM – 9:00 AM Legislative Update with Congresswoman Axne-Council Bluffs

03/02/2021 7:00 PM – 8:00 PM Blue Statehouse Alert – Statewide

03/05/2021 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM Town Hall – Butler County

03/05/2021 11:30 AM – 1:00 PM Legislative Session Update – Ames

03/06/2021 8:00 AM – 9:00 AM Legislative Coffee – Guthrie Center

03/06/2021 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM Legislative Coffee – Grinnell

03/06/2021 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM Town Hall – Linn County

03/06/2021 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM Legislative Coffee – Greenfield

03/06/2021 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM Legislative Forum – Carroll

03/08/2021 8:00 AM – 10:30 AM Marti’s Morning Coffee – Des Moines

03/09/2021 7:00 PM – 8:00 PM Blue Statehouse Alert – Statewide

03/12/2021 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM Town Hall – Hampton

03/12/2021 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Legislative Forum – Cedar Valley

03/13/2021 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM Eggs & Issues – Spencer

03/13/2021 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM Legislative Coffee – Creston

03/13/2021 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM Coffee Chat – Altoona

03/15/2021 8:00 AM – 10:30 AM Marti’s Morning Coffee – Des Moines

03/16/2021 7:00 PM – 8:00 PM Blue Statehouse Alert – Statewide

03/26/2021 11:00 AM – 11:45 AM March Capitol Chat

April 2021

04/23/2021 11:00 AM – 11:45 AM April Capitol Chat

Posted in Iowa legislature 2021 | Tagged | Comments Off on Legislative Forums – Today And Next Month

Bipartisan Group of Iowa County Auditors Propose Reforms Following Flawed IA-02 Recount 

Update from the Rita Hart for Congress campaign:

KCRG: “Because different counties use different methods a uniform approach for counting ballots wasn’t performed.”

After a flawed and inconsistent recount left at least 22 voters disenfranchised and thousands of ballots unexamined in Iowa’s Second Congressional District, a bipartisan group of county auditors in Iowa have issued recommended reforms to address some of the issues that left legally cast votes uncounted in IA-02. As KCRG reported last night, these Republican and Democratic election administrators recognize the need for fixes that will guarantee that Iowans’ constitutional right to cast their vote and have that vote counted is not infringed upon as a result of outdated rules and unworkable, arbitrary deadlines.

County auditors proposes reforms to recounts after contested race in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District

By Ethan Stein, February 25, 2021

CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – The Iowa State Association of County Auditors gave a list of recommendations to lawmakers on reforming the state’s rules regarding recounts.

The first recommendation, which comes from a bipartisan group of auditors, is to stop different counties from recounting ballots in different ways. This is a fix to a problem seen in the recount of Iowa’s Second Congressional District, which was decided by six votes.

Under current law, auditors have 18 days to recount their ballots regardless of the number of votes it has to recount. The deadline and the number of votes were one reason some counties decided to recount ballots by machine rather than by hand. Some counties recounted their ballots using a mix of both methods.

But, the use of multiple methods meant the standard of what makes a counted ballot for a candidate is different by county.

Eric Van Lancker (D), who was the chair of the bipartisan group and the Clinton County Auditor, said machines and people count a choice on a ballot in a different way.

“When you send them through the machine, the machine has its standards for reading those ballots,” he said. “But when you hand count those ballots, there’s a different standard to how you count those ballots.”

Van Lancker said that different standard comes from voter intent, which a recount by hand could determine. He explained voter intent through an example of an overvote, which is when somebody votes for more candidates than they can vote for on a ballot.

“The machine is simply going to read that as an overvote and no vote is counted,” Van Lanker said. “But when you hand count, that folks who are hand counting, that recount board hand-counting, can say ‘Oh no, this person clearly crossed off this candidate and shaded in for this candidate so it’s clearly a vote for this candidate.’”

Because different counties use different methods a uniform approach for counting ballots wasn’t performed.

[…]

Read the full piece here.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bipartisan Group of Iowa County Auditors Propose Reforms Following Flawed IA-02 Recount 

Kim Reynolds And Big Ag

CCI continues the fight for Iowans and against factory farms

Iowans across the state want good-paying jobs, clean air and water, and vibrant communities.

But Governor Kim Reynolds only cares about one thing: big checks from factory farm corporations like Iowa Select, the fourth-largest pork producer in the country.

If Reynolds and factory farm corporations like Iowa Select think they can rig the rules to increase their profits without Iowans fighting back – they have another thing coming. [BFIA note: Iowa governor auctioned off access for pork barons’ charity. Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds auctioned off an afternoon of her time to the highest bidder to raise money for her top campaign donors’ charity]

In the last couple weeks alone hundreds of Iowans have taken action for a moratorium on factory farms:

  • With over 100 Iowans participating in a virtual rally led by farmers and rural Iowans;
  • Participating in trainings on how we tell our stories and lobby legislators even in a pandemic; and
  • Driving over 150 Iowans called Speaker of House Pat Grassley, who claimed Iowans don’t want a factory farm moratorium.

This fight back is being led by Iowans from across the state.

Rural Iowans – like Michele – who built her dream home in rural Scott county, is now surrounded by thousands of corporate owned hogs;

Urban Iowans – like Shari – who depends on expensive nitrate removal systems in the Des Moines metro area for clean, safe water; and

Iowa farmers – like Joss – whose loved one’s health have been exploited by factory farm expansion in her corner of the state.

Our power doesn’t come from special interest donations. Our power comes from everyday people.

Will you join our movement of clean water protectors and factory farm fights with a gift of $25, $50 or $100?

Together we are building a better food & farm system, one that works for farmers, workers, eaters and the environment.

For a people and planet first Iowa.

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Kim Reynolds And Big Ag

Iowa Republicans To Impose Anti-Democratic Burdensome Regulations On Voting

While Iowa Republicans are busy embarrassing themselves in the legislature, a dark shadow may be looming over their anti-democratic plans.

brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-january-2021

“other state lawmakers are seizing on an energized electorate and persistent interest in democracy reform (which is likewise reflected in Congress). To date, thirty-five states have introduced, pre-filed, or carried over 406 bills to expand voting access (dwarfing the 188 expansive bills that were filed in twenty-nine states as of February 3, 2020).”

brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/brennan-center-comment-senates-designation-people-act-s-1

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, and Sen. Jeff Merkley announced that the For the People Act, a historic democracy reform bill, will be the first piece of legislation introduced this session in the Senate. The announcement comes after the House reintroduced its version of the bill earlier this month. The Brennan Center helped develop many of the core policies in the For the People Act, including – automatic voter registration, restoring voting rights for people with past criminal convictions, redistricting reform, and small donor public financing.

Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, had this comment on the For the People Act:

“It is unprecedented and encouraging that Senate leaders have said they will introduce the For the People Act as the first bill in the session. This responds to two twin crises facing our country: the attack on democracy reflected in the assault on the Capitol, and the demand for racial justice. Throughout the country’s history, the best way to defend democracy is to strengthen democracy. S. 1 would be the most significant democracy reform in more than half a century.

“It incorporates the key measures that are urgently needed. Automatic voter registration to modernize our elections. A national guarantee of free and fair elections without voter suppression. Small donor public financing to curb the corrupting role of big money. An end to partisan gerrymandering. A restoration of ethics throughout government. A commitment to restore the strength of the Voting Rights Act. 

“This election showed the passionate commitment to our democracy reflected in the highest voter turnout in over a century, despite the pandemic, voter suppression, and presidential lies. We’ve known for a long time that the democracy we cherish needs renewal and reform. This measure would be sweeping historic legislation. It is especially significant that this proposal now is the first piece of legislation in both chambers of Congress. We urge lawmakers to act swiftly.”

Related resources

 

Posted in Blog for Iowa | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Iowa Republicans To Impose Anti-Democratic Burdensome Regulations On Voting