ICCI Voter Owned Lobby Day in Des Moines
By Caroline Vernon
Progressive Action for the Common Good (PACG)
has reserved a passenger van to transport Quad City activists to Des Moines next Monday, January
29th. We will be joining other progressive activists across Iowa in order to lobby our
state legislators on the importance of clean elections and public
financing of campaigns. Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (ICCI)
is the main organizer of this event and has already laid a lot of
groundwork around this issue. This is a price-less (pun intended)
opportunity to make a difference in the fight to reclaim our democracy.
Monday's Agenda:
We will leave from the NE corner of the Northpark Mall parking lot
(near Sears) at 8:00am. This van seats 12. We have 6 open seats available and will be stopping at the Perkins restaturant in Iowa City to pick up a couple more folks so if you live in the QC area or in Iowa City and would like to join us, please contact Caroline ASAP to reserve a
seat: 563-676-7580,
carolina1961@gmail.com. Others from the QC area will also be carpooling to Des Moines.
Please wear a green shirt (representing money) and if possible, bring a
dozen or more home-made cookies along. Currently, lobbyists are allowed
to spend a maximum of $2.99 on each legislator so we would like to
bring home-made cookies to share, to represent home-made elections. If
you are willing to contribute goodies for the cause please let me know.
If you are unable to attend, but would be willing to bake some cookies,
that would be terrific! Finally, to help defray some of the cost of
renting the bus, we are asking for a $10 donation from each
participant.
<!–
D(["mb","
Once we get to the Capitol, we will debrief at 11am to go over our talking points and the day's activities. At noon, we will participate in a rally and press conference. Former Congressman Berkley Bedell, Ed Fallon, Pam Yoakum, and Mike Connelly will all speak to the importance of voter-owned clean elections. From 12:30 to 3pm, we will all have an opportunity to lobby each of our state reps on this issue. We will then plan to get on the bus by 3:15pm so we can return home in time for dinner, around 6pm.n
CCI is expecting an estimated turnout of close to 150 activists from around the state. I am confident we can fill the bus which will make a significant statement of our dedication to this issue since we are coming from all the way across the state. We expect to have a bill number to lobby around by next week.n
Thanks for all you do – hope to see you on the bus!
Caroline Vernon
563-676-7580
ncarolina1961@gmail.com
For more information on why this issue is so important, please read the following:n
nnAre Political Action Committees trying to use money to influence OUR legislature?
nIowans shouldn't have to wonder.
Tell your legislators to support Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections!
n
The Clean Elections Act will help restore fairness to our elections by allowing everyday Iowans the opportunity to run for office, regardless of how much money they can access. Voters won't have to wonder if large contributors are gaining unbalanced access to OUR representatives.n”,1]
);
//–>
Once
we get to the Capitol, we will debrief at 11am to go over our talking
points and the day's activities. At noon, we will participate in a
rally and press conference. Former Congressman Berkley Bedell, Ed
Fallon, Pam Yoakum, and Mike Connelly will all speak to the importance
of voter-owned clean elections. From 12:30 to 3pm, we will all have an
opportunity to lobby each of our state reps on this issue. We will then
plan to leave Des Moines promptly by 3:15pm so we can return home in time for
dinner, around 6pm.
CCI is expecting an estimated turnout of
close to 150 activists from around the state. I am hopeful that we can fill the remaining seats in the van. We
expect to have a bill number to lobby around by next week.
Thanks for all you do – hope to see you in Des Moines!
Caroline Vernon
563-676-7580
carolina1961@gmail.com
For more information on why this issue is so important, please read the following:
Are Political Action Committees trying to use money to influence OUR legislature?
Iowans shouldn't have to wonder.
Tell your legislators to support Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections!
The
Clean Elections Act will help restore fairness to our elections by
allowing everyday Iowans the opportunity to run for office, regardless
of how much money they can access. Voters won't have to wonder if
large contributors are gaining unbalanced access to OUR
representatives.
<!–
D(["mb","
The Clean Elections Act would provide a limited amount of public financing for candidatesn who:
Pledge to not raise any private money for their campaigns.
Pledge to not use any of their own money for their campaigns.n
Collect a set number of signatures and $5 contributions from within their own district to prove they are viable.
It Can Work!
Maine and Arizona have been effectively using the system for four election cycles and the results have been good for democracy.n
More people are running for office.
More people are turning out to vote.
Candidates report spending more time talking to voters.
9 of 11 statewide officeholders in Arizona, including the Governor and Attorney General, have been elected without taking money from PACs and big money contributors, spending only a fraction of what is used in conventional races like Iowa's.n
We Need it Now!
Voter-Owned Elections help ensure a healthy democracy by:
nFreeing candidates from the money chase and allowing them to spend all their campaign time talking with voters.
nCreating a fair playing field by reducing the need to raise large amounts of money to win.n
Giving more Iowans the chance to run for office – regardless of their access to big money or their willingness to accept PAC contributions.n”,1]
);
//–>
The Clean Elections Act would provide a limited amount of public financing for candidates
who:
Pledge to not raise any private money for their campaigns.
Pledge to not use any of their own money for their campaigns.
Collect a set number of signatures and $5 contributions from within their own district to prove they are viable.
It Can Work!
Maine and Arizona have been effectively using the system for four election cycles and the results have been good for democracy.
More people are running for office.
More people are turning out to vote.
Candidates report spending more time talking to voters.
9
of 11 statewide officeholders in Arizona, including the Governor and
Attorney General, have been elected without taking money from PACs and
big money contributors, spending only a fraction of what is used in
conventional races like Iowa's.
We Need it Now!
Voter-Owned Elections help ensure a healthy democracy by:
Freeing candidates from the money chase and allowing them to spend all their campaign time talking with voters.
Creating a fair playing field by reducing the need to raise large amounts of money to win.
Giving
more Iowans the chance to run for office – regardless of their access
to big money or their willingness to accept PAC contributions.
<!–
D(["mb","
Creating a system where Iowans won't have to wonder if big contributions are influencing votes at the capitol with their campaign contributions.n
The Clean Elections Act u003d Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections
Background:
A Clean Elections Act would create voluntary public financing for state elections. Candidates would qualify for public funding if they vowed to raise no private money, vowed to not use any of their own money, and collected a set number of signatures and $5 contributions from within their district.n
In a contested general election, eligible candidates who chose to use the system would receive:
n$3 million for a team running for governor and lieutenant governor.
$200,000 for a candidate for attorney general.n
$125,000 for a candidate for a statewide office other than governor, lieutenant governor, or attorney general.
$40,000 for a candidate for the Iowa senate.
$30,000 for a candidate for the Iowa house or representatives.n
Summary:
Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections is a system that would free candidates from the money chase and allow them to spend more time with voters and constituents. The same system has been used in Maine and Arizona for four full election cycles and has proven to be an effective way of reducing the influence of big money on elections. 6 of 8 statewide office holders in Arizona were elected without using any special interest money. Voter turnout has increased by over 20%. The number of people running for office has increased. And in the Nov 2006 Election, Governor Janet Napolitano won re-election, combining with her challenger to spend only $2 million, compared to the combined $18 million spent by candidates in the Iowa gubernatorial race.n”,1]
);
//–>
Creating
a system where Iowans won't have to wonder if big contributions are
influencing votes at the capitol with their campaign contributions.
The Clean Elections Act = Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections
Background:
A
Clean Elections Act would create voluntary public financing for state
elections. Candidates would qualify for public funding if they vowed
to raise no private money, vowed to not use any of their own money, and
collected a set number of signatures and $5 contributions from within
their district.
In a contested general election, eligible candidates who chose to use the system would receive:
$3 million for a team running for governor and lieutenant governor.
$200,000 for a candidate for attorney general.
$125,000 for a candidate for a statewide office other than governor, lieutenant governor, or attorney general.
$40,000 for a candidate for the Iowa senate.
$30,000 for a candidate for the Iowa house or representatives.
Summary:
Voter
Owned Iowa Clean Elections is a system that would free candidates from
the money chase and allow them to spend more time with voters and
constituents. The same system has been used in Maine and Arizona for
four full election cycles and has proven to be an effective way of
reducing the influence of big money on elections. 6 of 8 statewide
office holders in Arizona were elected without using any special
interest money. Voter turnout has increased by over 20%. The number
of people running for office has increased. And in the Nov 2006
Election, Governor Janet Napolitano won re-election, combining with her
challenger to spend only $2 million, compared to the combined $18
million spent by candidates in the Iowa gubernatorial race.
<!–
D(["mb","
A Clean Elections Act will allow every day Iowans to run for office without having to worry about raising large amounts of money. Phase I of CCI's "Money and Elections in Iowa" study shows that the majority of money given to candidates is coming from PACs. Challengers are at a huge disadvantage, needing to raise $65,000 to be competitive in a race for the house and $100,000 to be competitive for the senate. And as campaign spending has gotten out of control, campaigns have gone south. The Clean Elections Act would limit unnecessary spending by placing contribution limits on donors. The Clean Elections Act would also require Media outlets to file reports outlining who is paying for political advertisements, curbing the explosion of negative advertising. n
For the cost of $5 per voter, Iowans could know for certain that their elected officials are working to address the needs of all Iowans, and not have to wonder about where all the money comes from. For around $10 million a year, our state elected officials would have the chance to focus on ideas and meeting their constituents, not chasing down the combined $32 million spent in the Nov. 2006 elections. nTell your legislator today: "Iowans want Voter Owned Clean Elections!"n
nnn”,0]
);
D([“ce”]);
//–>
A
Clean Elections Act will allow every day Iowans to run for office
without having to worry about raising large amounts of money. Phase I
of CCI's “Money and Elections in Iowa” study shows that the majority of
money given to candidates is coming from PACs. Challengers are at a
huge disadvantage, needing to raise $65,000 to be competitive in a race
for the house and $100,000 to be competitive for the senate. And as
campaign spending has gotten out of control, campaigns have gone south.
The Clean Elections Act would limit unnecessary spending by placing
contribution limits on donors. The Clean Elections Act would also
require Media outlets to file reports outlining who is paying for
political advertisements, curbing the explosion of negative
advertising.
For the cost of $5 per voter, Iowans could know for certain
that their elected officials are working to address the needs of all
Iowans, and not have to wonder about where all the money comes from.
For around $10 million a year, our state elected officials would have
the chance to focus on ideas and meeting their constituents, not
chasing down the combined $32 million spent in the Nov. 2006 elections.
Tell your legislator today: “Iowans want Voter Owned Clean Elections!”
Blog For Iowa 