Instant Runoff Voting Is Catching On

Instant Runoff Voting Is Catching On


By Steven Hill



This was originally posted at Truthout.Org


Political
reforms such as redistricting reform, fusion, and campaign finance
reform have been floundering at the ballot box in recent years,
rejected by voters in several states. But another political reform,
instant runoff voting, has been quietly racking up impressive victories.


 

Instant
runoff voting (IRV), which allows voters to rank their candidates 1, 2,
3, made great strides forward during the November 7 elections. Voters
in four different jurisdictions overwhelmingly approved ballot measures
for IRV. In California, voters in Oakland approved the idea with a
landslide 69 percent of the vote, as did 56 percent of voters in Davis.
In Minneapolis, a landslide 65 percent of voters passed an IRV ballot
measure, as did 53 percent of voters in Pierce County, Washington.




What is
interesting about the victories is that they happened in four very
different locations. Oakland is a very diverse, working-class city;
Minneapolis is a Midwestern-values city; Pierce County is a mix of
rural/suburban/urban areas with many independent-minded voters; and
Davis is a small university town. Yet in each place, IRV provided a
unique solution to problems with representative government.




Instant
runoff voting ensures that officeholders are elected with a majority of
the vote in a single November election. No separate runoffs or
primaries are necessary. Voters rank their candidates, and if their
first choice can't win, their vote goes to their second-ranked
candidate as their runoff choice. Voters are liberated to vote for the
candidates they really like without worrying about “spoilers.” You can
rank your favorite candidate first, knowing if she or he can't win, you
haven't wasted your vote because it will go to your second choice.


 

IRV is
catching on, whether on the liberal coasts or in heartland America.
North Carolina recently passed groundbreaking legislation to use IRV to
fill vacancies for statewide judicial offices and for local elections,
and there's talk of using it for all statewide offices. Driving the
interest in North Carolina are elections like the runoff in 2004 for
the Democratic nominee for superintendent of public instruction, which
cost $3.5 million and produced a 3 percent voter turnout.




Recently
Louisiana, Arkansas and South Carolina, which already use two-round
runoff elections for various races, began using IRV for their
military/overseas voters because there is not enough time to mail a
second ballot to them when a runoff election is required.


 

Colorado
recently became the first state to use IRV to fill a vacancy in the
state legislature. Takoma Park, Maryland, will use IRV for the first
time in 2007 to elect the mayor and city council. Burlington, Vermont,
used IRV to elect its mayor last spring, spurring the introduction of
bills in the state legislature for its use in statewide elections.
Following the Minneapolis and Pierce County victories, the largest
newspapers in Minnesota and Washington have called for IRV to be used
to elect state offices.


 

San
Francisco voters launched the IRV movement in 2002 when they passed it
for local elections, and San Francisco has used it now for three
elections. Several exit polls have demonstrated that San Francisco
voters across all racial, age and economic lines like ranking their
ballots and understand IRV. Since San Francisco's trailblazing voyage,
nine ballot measures for IRV have been passed by voters, often with
landslide margins.


 

The
movement toward use of IRV is gaining momentum because it answers a
real need. It's one of the best solutions to public frustration with
unresponsive and unaccountable government. IRV makes voters feel like
their votes count, because they are not stuck always choosing the
lesser of two evils; they can cast their vote for their favorite
candidate, knowing if she or he can't win, they haven't thrown their
vote away on a spoiler. IRV opens politics to new candidates and their
ideas, increases political debate, and even discourages negative
campaigning as candidates try to win rankings from the supporters of
their opponents.


 

For all
these reasons, instant runoff voting is now the hot reform to watch as
Americans grapple with how to improve our democracy and make elected
officials more accountable to We the Voters.




 Steven Hill is director of the political reform program of the New America Foundation and author of 10 Steps to Repair American Democracy.

 

This entry was posted in Instant Runnoff Voting, Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.