Call to Action: New US Supreme Court Justice – No Rubber Stamps
U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy
This morning, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor announced her retirement from the United States Supreme Court.
This is
a momentous time in our nation's history. The next justice will have
enormous influence on a woman's medical decisions, the rights of
workers and consumers, the civil and privacy rights of us all, the
enforcement of our environmental laws, how our elections are conducted,
and nearly every other aspect of our lives.
We
cannot allow the independence of our courts to be threatened by a
judicial activist who places personal ideology above the law. The
Supreme Court is no place for fringe judges. And the Senate is not a
rubber stamp for any president's nominations.
Join me in calling for inclusive, thoughtful deliberations during this process:
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/norubberstamps
The
Constitution requires that the President seek the Senate's advice and
consent in making appointments to the federal courts. As a Senator and
as the Democratic leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I take this
responsibility very seriously.
America
must maintain separate but equal branches of government. Neither the
legislature, nor the judiciary, should be subjugated to the will of any
president – or to the loudest wing of any political party.
In recent years, [Bush] has chosen a path of confrontation rather than consultation with the Senate.
I voted
against Janice Rogers Brown, a judge quoted telling conservative
audiences that the New Deal “mark[ed] the triumph of our own socialist
revolution,” and that elderly Americans who depend on Social Security
“blithely cannibalize their grandchildren.”
I voted
against Priscilla Owen, a judge who inserts her opinions into the law
so freely that [Bush's] own attorney general once called her behavior
“unconscionable … judicial activism.”
Once
again, the power to avoid political warfare over a judicial nominee —
this time to the Supreme Court — is in the hands of [George W. Bush].
The process begins with him.
[Bush]
will decide whether there will be a divisive or unifying process and
nomination. If consensus is a goal, bipartisan consultation will help
achieve it. I believe that is what the American people want and what
they deserve. [Bush] can unite the nation and the Senate with his
choice, or he can once again divide us.
If
[Bush] chooses a Supreme Court nominee because of that nominee's
ideological fervor or record of activism in the hope that he or she
will deliver political victories, [Bush] will have done so knowing that
he is again choosing the path of confrontation. He will do so knowing
that we will once again be forced to defend our belief that the Supreme
Court should not be an arm of either political party. It belongs to all
Americans.
If the
right-wing activists who were disappointed that their nuclear option
was averted convince [Bush] to choose a divisive nominee, they will not
prevail without a difficult Senate battle. And if they do, what will
they have wrought? The American people will be the losers: The
independence of and respect for the judiciary will have suffered a
damaging blow from which the judiciary may not soon recover.
We need to send a message that the Supreme Court should be above such partisan politics at:
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/norubberstamps
[Bush]
and Republican leaders have a choice: choose a battle that divides
America, or seek a middle ground with a nominee we all can trust to
fairly interpret and uphold the Constitution and the law. Let the
Senators who will make this important decision know that America
doesn't want us to rubber stamp [Bush's] nominee.
I will be working with Democracy for America during this historic period to keep you up to date on the Senate's deliberations.
Thank you,
Senator Patrick Leahy
Ranking Democratic Member, Senate Judiciary Committee
Blog For Iowa 