In his two latest books [The 9/11 Commission Report:  Omissions and Distortions and The New Pearl
Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11] and during
a powerful television presentation [C-Span Book TV May 7, 2005], David Griffin,
theologian and 9/11 researcher, put
together the most thorough analysis to date of the official Kean commission
report on 9/11. Griffin’s
examination provides a series of powerful arguments for likely government
complicity in the attacks. 

David Ray Griffin is not a crackpot or a conspiracy
theorist. He is a theologian with a highly impressive background in religious
philosophy who is passionately pursuing the truth about 9/11. He is also a
fearless American, concerned that the conclusions of the Kean Commission
whitewash much of the conflicting evidence about the attacks that has been
unearthed. His appeal is clearly directed at the religious community in this
country, whose basic precepts of goodness, decency and truth should loudly
demand an open inquiry into the evidence known today. 

Griffin classifies public sentiment of the events of
September 11th by breaking it down into 4 classifications. In summary, they are
as follows: 

1.  Those who believe that Al Qaeda outsmarted the global
intelligence community and surprised the US
with the attacks and the Bush administration is responding  accordingly.

2.  Those who believe that Al Qaeda outsmarted the global
intelligence community and surprised the US with the attacks and the Bush administration is taking political advantage of
the situation.

3.  Those who believe that the Bush administration
permitted the attacks to occur in order to take political advantage of the
situation.

4.  Those who believe that the Bush administration is
complicit in the orchestration of the attacks in order to take political
advantage of the situation. 

We feel there is an even more revealing classification. It places the American public in only TWO
major groups: 

1.  Those who feel that the Bush administration, at the
very least, had the opportunity to stop
the attacks, and at the very most, orchestrated them.

2.  Those who refuse to objectively examine or listen to
evidence that indicates complicity by
the Bush administration. 

We firmly believe that those people who fully believe the
conclusions of the Kean Commission have never seen or heard any of the compelling
evidence to the contrary.

(Click here to read the entire article)