Democrats Learn The Wrong Lesson
The Nation
The Democrats seem to have learned the wrong lesson. Surprise! Bush Zones Go National
by Jim Hightower
At the
2000 GOP nominating convention in Philadelphia, candidate Bush created
a fenced-in, out-of-sight protest zone that could only hold barely
1,500 people at a time. So citizens who wished to give voice to their
many grievances with the Powers That Be had to:
(1) Schedule their exercise of First Amendment rights with the decidedly unsympathetic authorities.
(2) Report like cattle to the protest pen at their designated time, and only in the numbers authorized.
(3)
Then, under the recorded surveillance of the authorities, feel free to
let loose with all the speech they could utter within their allotted
minutes (although no one–not Bush, not convention delegates, not the
preening members of Congress, not the limousine-gliding corporate
sponsors and certainly not the mass media–would be anywhere nearby to
hear a single word of what they had to say).
Imagine
how proud the Founders would be of this interpretation of their
revolutionary work. The Democrats, always willing to learn useful
tricks from the opposition, created their own “free-speech zone” when
they gathered in Los Angeles that year for their convention.
(more)
As a Boston DNC delegate, knowing the Democratic and liberal protestors in NYC are going to be kept across town away from the Republican Convention site so they wouldn't even see protests; I feel the anti-abortion “God-hates Fags” crowd was very fortunate to get to have their incessant ranting on bullhorns get to reach the passionate crowd of Democrats trying to excercise their rights to convene without physical and violent harassment, which those protestors have had a history of doing.
I wasn't in the mood to possibly fear for my safety and others and defend myself, while those non-followers of non-violence could lurk and confront conventioners under the guise of exercising their First Amendment rights.
LikeLike